I just read the other thread, as well as this one on the matter. I saw the article in the paper at the time and thought the person the article was about was obviously an attention seeker, and the threads have not disappointed.
It was a very, very minor incident, which your club may not have even noticed. The fact you took such offence to someone advocating peace, as many others have done i.e. SA cricketers, actors at awards ceremonies etc, especially at such a small sign is in my opinion disgraceful.
You say you have your right to protest, so what, you can do it but Murphy can't? The Bulldogs obviously need more members, and I'm almost tempted to buy one myself after reading about your 'protest' claiming you do it so the club will listen, how can it listen if it doesn't exist, did you think about that?