Asia China's growing influence

Remove this Banner Ad

Peace leaves US on side lines??? Thoughts and prayers to the US in these difficult times…


 
well Iran and USA are not best of Mates are they?

What does that have to do with wanting peace?


… and this is why the trust in the US is diminishing. The US is not interested in peace … because peace doesn’t make you money, peace doesn’t sell fear, peace doesn’t increase weapons orders, peace doesn’t prop up your failing economy.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What does that have to do with wanting peace?


… and this is why the trust in the US is diminishing. The US is not interested in peace … because peace doesn’t make you money, peace doesn’t sell fear, peace doesn’t increase weapons orders, peace doesn’t prop up your failing economy.
true. The unired states have had their fingers in every pie .

they have military bases everywhere around the world too.
 
Interview with Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Google, on competition between the PRC and the West.

 
So now we have WA's Premier saying we need to have OUR national cabinet In China to show we mean to fix relationships? While we are building nuclear subs because of thier threat? How much is CCP paying McGowan?
 

New level of threat-posture: Chinese jumbo bomber drone flies around Taiwan for the first time

The TB-001 is a medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned combat aerial vehicle first unveiled by the PLA in 2020, and first spotted by Japan’s Maritime Self-Defense Force operating in the East China Sea in August 2021. The drone has both reconnaissance and attack functions, and is capable of carrying a 1,200 kilogram payload including 250 kilogram laser-guided bomb, FT-7 glide bomb, FT-9 guided bomb, AR-4 air-to-surface missile, AR-3 cruise missile, FT-8D, or FT-10 air-to-ground missiles.
tb-001.jpg
 
Solomon Islands’ Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s nephew and chief advisor, Robson Djokovic has died of a heart attack. Allegedly he was one of the prime movers wrt Solomons island/PRC relationship and a teensy-weensy bit corrupt if the article is to be believed.


You can read it here or if you can't see it at the Oz.
 
An article from Fortune Magazine discusses some of the issues with PRC loans and the not so positive effects on the countries which have taken them. Many of these countries will end up being 'owned' by the PRC. The 21C version of colonialism.

 
An article from Fortune Magazine discusses some of the issues with PRC loans and the not so positive effects on the countries which have taken them. Many of these countries will end up being 'owned' by the PRC. The 21C version of colonialism.

Problem is that China's Provincial Governments are having their own debt crises. The kinds of debt that would put the Solomon Islands' debt to shame.


Guizhou has debt of $3.6 trillion US. It's only got <40m people and triple the debt of Australia for a tiny provincial province. And this type of debt is replicated across China. If I was a betting person, it wouldn't be on the price of Iron Ore holding up (a lot of this debt is on infrastructure).
 
An article from Fortune Magazine discusses some of the issues with PRC loans and the not so positive effects on the countries which have taken them. Many of these countries will end up being 'owned' by the PRC. The 21C version of colonialism.

Not that long ago it was accepted wisdom that China would be more benevolent than the west when it came to this sort of thing.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Not that long ago it was accepted wisdom that China would be more benevolent than the west when it came to this sort of thing.
There was much 'accepted wisdom' about the rise of the PRC, unfortunately most of it turned out to be wrong and we now have a belligerent PRC causing all sorts of grief, especially for the neighbours. The mask has fallen away from the Panda revealing a Dragon.
 
Interesting article from Foreign Policy suggesting the PRC chances of becoming a regional Hegemon are likely to fail, using historical analogies of previous attempts in Europe and Asia - while conveniently failing to mention the long history of China as the regional hegemon in Asia. Still an interesting perspective.

 
This article from The Diplomat looks at what was said (and what wasn't) by the new Chinese Defense Minister, Li Shangfu, at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue. It's got a bit more depth than the reporting at the time which focused on the refusal of the minister to meet his US opposite and the belligerent tone he set in his speech - which according to the article muddied the waters a bit. .

 
This article from The Diplomat looks at what was said (and what wasn't) by the new Chinese Defense Minister, Li Shangfu, at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue. It's got a bit more depth than the reporting at the time which focused on the refusal of the minister to meet his US opposite and the belligerent tone he set in his speech - which according to the article muddied the waters a bit. .

They seem to be staking territorial claims to the Taiwan Straits by harassing foreign ships that transit through it. I felt when they ramped up the incursions of ADIZ that they were doing the anaconda constricting thing, a tiny bit at a time. Looks like they may be taking it to the surface fleet as well.
 
What does that have to do with wanting peace?


… and this is why the trust in the US is diminishing. The US is not interested in peace … because peace doesn’t make you money, peace doesn’t sell fear, peace doesn’t increase weapons orders, peace doesn’t prop up your failing economy.
Well poor little Israel is stuck in the middle surrounded by many Muslim populated countries.

I know Iran and Saudi Arabia hate each other too.
 
What does that have to do with wanting peace?


… and this is why the trust in the US is diminishing. The US is not interested in peace … because peace doesn’t make you money, peace doesn’t sell fear, peace doesn’t increase weapons orders, peace doesn’t prop up your failing economy.
the us are too busy trying to protect a country from an invading force in europe and you somehow claim they are anti peace?
 
The US is busy fuelling the war. They're not interested in peace.

No no no … this time they want peace
😂

Omg can we not post this pro russian garbage. Helping a country take back their stolen land is not fuelling a war. Its both the moral thing to do to help innocent people from being murdered and losing their country to a dictatorship and it discourages future invasions so is therefore pro peace. The fact you look at the russian invasion of ukraine as americans fuelling a war is utterly warped thinking not to mention a bit disgusting. Allowing dictators to invade and take what they want with violence is not pro peace. Its pro violence.

The americans have also actually been pushing back against supplying Ukraine with their more advanced weopans and have no soldiers on the ground. The only thing the US can be accused of is not helping enough.

both your posts are embarrasing. I encourage both of you to think about the issue more deeply.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top