Remove this Banner Ad

Chit Chat Part 2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

thats awesome im tossing up between s bar and rosebud, im thinking 60 dollar night and s bar will win out need to discuss this with the boys though
 
my money has it that if sneaky makes an apperance at the sporty he will be on here bagging it by monday. something tells me he may think he is a little to cool to enjoy what the sporty is really about.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah i dont think he'll get it steamboat. The skintight jeans and emo haircut and threads he'll have on just wont quite fit in.

Thats piss funny.

You must be taking the piss Plugger surely. Everyone knows the scumbag did it.

Please remind me of how our justice system works. Im not saying its right. I am saying that its all we have and if we cant have faith that it works, then what have we got?

And we probably need to be carefull talking about it, in any case.

If he didnt do it then there is a murderer still walking around in Moe.

You are probably right. Or he/she may be gone or even deceased themselves. Who knows? There were a lot of suspects talked about, but only one brought to trial.
 
The way our adversarial justice system works is that the accused must be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a criminal case. The jury can think that the accused has committed the crime but cannot find him guilty unless they are sure. In addition to this the jury must come to a unanomous decision. So if one juror is not satisfied beyond reseasonable doubt then the accused cannot be found guilty.

If Domaszewicz were to be tried in a inquisitorial system or in a civil trial where there is a lesser standard of proof he may well lose.
 
The way our adversarial justice system works is that the accused must be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a criminal case. The jury can think that the accused has committed the crime but cannot find him guilty unless they are sure. In addition to this the jury must come to a unanomous decision. So if one juror is not satisfied beyond reseasonable doubt then the accused cannot be found guilty.

If Domaszewicz were to be tried in a inquisitorial system or in a civil trial where there is a lesser standard of proof he may well lose.
nerd.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Re: Melissa Theuriau

melissa-theuriau.jpg



I would push a marble accross the Sahara desert with my **** just to suck the last guy's dick that ****ed her
yes.
 
The way our adversarial justice system works is that the accused must be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a criminal case. The jury can think that the accused has committed the crime but cannot find him guilty unless they are sure. In addition to this the jury must come to a unanomous decision. So if one juror is not satisfied beyond reseasonable doubt then the accused cannot be found guilty.

If Domaszewicz were to be tried in a inquisitorial system or in a civil trial where there is a lesser standard of proof he may well lose.

Correct.

But we gota work with what we got, unfortunately.

Whether I think he is guilty or not, is irrelevant.

I have done jury duty twice and one case was thrown out due to insufficient evidence and the other (in which I was the foreman and nearly was put up on contempt charges), the judge ordered the verdict. I was not quite paying attention and nearly got thrown out...lol. Long story, but piss funny.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Chit Chat Part 2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top