Chris Scott says AFL grand final being locked in at MCG until 2057 ‘is a travesty’

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Apr 25, 2019
135
161
Odessa, Ukraine
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Boston Bruins, Liverpool
Why is Obama part of that GIF
To symbolically represent the nepotistic nature of the corrupt bureaucracy within the VFL and how a large proportion of the population overlook both Obama and the VFL's corrupt and surreptitious nature of (sports) politics as well as the tangential relation to real politics.

Or..

I just didn't see the face until after I posted the GIF. It's still relevant and I just justified it above.
 

Dazzler10

Premiership Player
Apr 30, 2015
3,762
8,685
Te Fiti
AFL Club
West Coast

Caro on the Geelong finals argument with some tie-in to the MCG debate.

I have to say I agree completely. And it's nice she's acknowledged the handicap for non-Victorian teams.
Her reasoning is as coherent as the average BigFooty post.
 

TY24

Mining Magnate
Mar 21, 2017
2,081
3,220
6056 gang gang
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Arsenal, Scorchers, Glory, Wildcats
Never been a fan of the locking fans out argument. If you earn the right to a home final, you should earn the right to play it at your home ground. If opposition fans miss out, tough tiddies. I'd have no problem with finals ticketing being split like a normal home and away game.
 

Godfather32

Brownlow Medallist
Jan 13, 2013
13,257
21,798
AFL Club
West Coast
Never been a fan of the locking fans out argument. If you earn the right to a home final, you should earn the right to play it at your home ground. If opposition fans miss out, tough tiddies. I'd have no problem with finals ticketing being split like a normal home and away game.
Their own fans would be missing out though, they have 64,000 members and we would get a certain allocation of tickets so even less of their Geelong members would get in than usual. (Assuming it was us in the game against them)
 

nameless

Brownlow Medallist
Feb 17, 2006
12,175
16,157
Perf
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Arsenal
Watching Talking Footy last night and BT is genuinely deranged with some of his views, especially in regards to where the Grand Final should be played and his reasoning for it being at the MCG.

Now I'm happy for the GF to be at the MCG currently, I think it makes sense and it is an amazing atmosphere and allows for maximum number of supporters to watch the game.

However, the signing of the MCG to host until 2057 is a joke and anyone who genuinely believes that's a good idea is a narrow-minded twat. Enter BT.

He says it's a good idea because this is the only ground to handle 100,000 people (which is fine), but doesn't see that over the next 40 years we could have another stadium in another state that could have the same capacity.
Also doesn't see that with the biggest sporting event locked away for 40 years it severely hampers the viability of other states to push for bigger capacity, given the govt and private investors know they won't be getting revenue from the AFL GF anytime soon.

BT ends his rant by saying, "it's the rules (that the GF be at the MCG until 2057) and I always follow the rules" whether tongue in cheek or not, it's a ridiculous notion to just fall down at the whim over the AFL overlords and tell everyone to follow the rules. If the rules are BS you call it out, you don't point to it and use it as a basis for your argument.

Anyway, it's very frustrating that people in the media think it's a good decision and don't look at how it MAY impact on the development of the game elsewhere.

Signing it until 2030 to guarantee the upgrades needed at the MCG while also looking to take the GF elsewhere in 10 years time seems like a far more viable option that should be have been taken.
 
Top Bottom