In a direct response to posters' refusal to give Scott too much credit, you claimed that Scott deserved more credit than we were giving him. There is no mention of spirit here as there was in some of your other posts; this scenario evidences a clash of opinions. An opinion I'm sure you hold firm to but are not willing to justify. That's fine too.
It really isn't a point of debate to begin with. To each their own though.
It really isn't a point of debate to begin with. To each their own though.
I was simply trying to say that I thought that was mean spirited, and he deserved a little more recognition than that.
I also never disagreed with you, or anyone else, about the need for Scott to prove himself in 2016/17. Nor did we disagree about Ablett's value to our team. You misinterpreted what I was trying to say.
Yet your reply was condescending, dismissive, as though talking to a child. I don't appreciate that, as I'm sure you wouldn't if the shoe was on the other foot.

