Remove this Banner Ad

News & Events Christchurch shooting

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

How would knowing what he looks like as opposed to knowing his name and the crimes he will be charged with make a difference? Usually when court grant a suppression order that includes the name. Also as stated no order was requested or granted.
People remember faces more easily. If the jury members see his face and think "hey, that's the guy from the video where 50 people were killed on camera" then that wouldn't be fair to the accused. The jury can only convict on the evidence presented in court, not their preconceived ideas or biases.
 
People remember faces more easily. If the jury members see his face and think "hey, that's the guy from the video where 50 people were killed on camera" then that wouldn't be fair to the accused. The jury can only convict on the evidence presented in court, not their preconceived ideas or biases.
But they're going to know who he is when they're in court hearing about what he's done. "Oh, he's that guy who has been constantly in the news these past few months for slaughtering 50 Muslims. Yeah, I reckon he's probably guilty given there's a video of him doing it."
 
But they're going to know who he is when they're in court hearing about what he's done. "Oh, he's that guy who has been constantly in the news these past few months for slaughtering 50 Muslims. Yeah, I reckon he's probably guilty given there's a video of him doing it."
And that's the issue when picking a jury: finding people who have no bias. Yeah, obviously you aren't going to find many people who don't know who the guy is and what he's done, but the jury has to be as impartial as possible. Maybe some people have been out of the country. Maybe some don't watch the news or use the internet. Maybe some know of the crime but haven't seen the video where the guy's face is shown.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

has anyone else noticed the hairpiece tarrant's court appointed lawyer was wearing last night on the nine news?

1552979344278.png

I should add that tarrant sacked him and said he would represent himself.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Telstra has blocked websites like 4chan, supposedly because those sites link to the footage of the event.

Yeah, wasn't it livestreamed on Facebook? They aren't banning Facebook, are they?

What a disgrace.
 
Apparently Telstra has blocked websites like 4chan, supposedly because those sites link to the footage of the event.

Yeah, wasn't it livestreamed on Facebook? They aren't banning Facebook, are they?

What a disgrace

Don't think anybody monitors the livestreams.

Unless you're streaming a pay-per-view event for free.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Apparently Telstra has blocked websites like 4chan, supposedly because those sites link to the footage of the event.

Yeah, wasn't it livestreamed on Facebook? They aren't banning Facebook, are they?

What a disgrace.
Yep. Just tried to go on 4chan and it returns an error. KiwiFarms the same.

4chan is a cesspit of the internet but blocking access to it is some China-level bullshit censorship. So what if the video is on there? NZ law regarding sharing of the video doesn't apply to us.

EDIT: Liveleak, Encyclopedia Dramatica also blocked.
 
Last edited:
Yep. Just tried to go on 4chan and it returns an error. KiwiFarms the same.

4chan is a cesspit of the internet but blocking access to it is some China-level bullshit censorship. So what if the video is on there? NZ law regarding sharing of the video doesn't apply to us.

EDIT: Liveleak, Encyclopedia Dramatica also blocked.

Using a VPN might help
 
But that's bullshit. Anning flew down for this event on the taxpayer. So it is a space of public discourse.

It is well enshrined in law that you are entitled to self defence within proportion.

The violence Anning's thugs meted out to the kid in every sense was disproportionate.

- They outnumbered him significantly
- They were much bigger than him
- They would have known very quickly that he was unarmed, and that he'd actually caused no injury to Anning
- They continued their assault long after it became apparent the kid was no threat

To answer your question, yes, what the kid did was assault. Albeit very low levl, but still assault.

They should all be up in court to answer for this - political violence has no place in a democracy.

What if Fraser egged Sarah Hanson-Young in the head, would that be a higher level assault?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yep. Just tried to go on 4chan and it returns an error. KiwiFarms the same.

4chan is a cesspit of the internet but blocking access to it is some China-level bullshit censorship. So what if the video is on there? NZ law regarding sharing of the video doesn't apply to us.

EDIT: Liveleak, Encyclopedia Dramatica also blocked.
Do you think you have some sort of right to watch 40 people being killed in cold blood.
 
I don't believe 4chan should be blocked but Facebook not. The shooter Facebook live streamed the attack, he didn't 4chan live stream it. I've never actually accessed 4chan and have only seen screenshots of its content, so I don't know exactly how it works but I don't like the idea of banning platforms.
 
Same diff.

For someone who makes his living off a game invented in Victoria, no, you owe us an apology for that.
 
Do you think you have some sort of right to watch 40 people being killed in cold blood.

Do you think you have the right to tell people they can't?

It is a historic document now.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom