- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,706
- 56,654
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Nice work Jezza!For the record I'm still alive and doing my duty by monitoring the Supreme Court daily cause list.
Wouldn't it be just peachy if court was recalled before the due date for reasons for us to find out on the day!
That would definitely be an attender day!
Nice work Jezza!
Off topic a Victorian judge called a lawyer’s questioning of a witness “boring”-and the defence is now attempting to prove it could have swayed the jury! .
Hall is a strong man listening to all that evidence without doing the same!
Definitely the right person for this case. I don’t know what the rest of the WA judge ranks are like, But Hall is definitely a good one.I think Justice Hall is too good a judge to ever act like that other judge. We are lucky to have him.
I said this a few months ago but I reckon quite a few posters here should get some recognition with some sort of badge.
Probably a Sherlock hat is lame but some sort of acknowledgement is due!
How cool would that be? I reckon it would be.Good idea, thanks I'll get onto it.
The Trail never lived up to the the hype, it was low key and respectful to the families.De fence strategy in the CSK trial,
was one ******* great big wall of silence.
Don’t know about everyone else, I’m getting itchy feet for June 8.
Well played.Itchy feet: 10 causes and how to get relief
Itchy feet can be bothersome and stop a person from sleeping or focusing on daily activities. Learn about the causes of itchy feet and how to treat them here.www.medicalnewstoday.com
De fence strategy in the CSK trial,
was one ******* great big wall of silence.
Its going to very interesting to hear Halls summary, he really has very little to go on (except fibers and one small bit of DNA under a finger nail). There were very few witness's called, of those called, no one saw him with or near the victims, no one linked him to the victims, no one saw him in the area where the abductions occurred. Of those that 'thought' they saw an abduction, either described a different car, a different person, wrong time or was drunk. Other witness's gave evidence which didn't shed any light on anything and when they tried to explain were silenced. Fiber and DNA experts pretty much waffled on about the same thing, over and over and over. And your so right BFEW, your description of the defense's strategy is spot on!!De fence strategy in the CSK trial,
was one ******* great big wall of silence.
Prosecution 0.8 daysI propose a guessing contest for the length of closing addresses. Not sure what first prize would be yet. Winner is closest to the actual time.
My guesses:
Prosecution 1 day
Defence 40 minutes.
I suspect that his family didn’t give much away, given how one extended family member went public with their scepticism of his guilt (prior to his admission of KK and Huntingdale). And his friends and colleagues perhaps genuinely didn’t notice anything worth mentioning.Its going to very interesting to hear Halls summary, he really has very little to go on (except fibers and one small bit of DNA under a finger nail). There were very few witness's called, of those called, no one saw him with or near the victims, no one linked him to the victims, no one saw him in the area where the abductions occurred. Of those that 'thought' they saw an abduction, either described a different car, a different person, wrong time or was drunk. Other witness's gave evidence which didn't shed any light on anything and when they tried to explain were silenced. Fiber and DNA experts pretty much waffled on about the same thing, over and over and over. And your so right BFEW, your description of the defense's strategy is spot on!!
Only a few work colleagues were called, no family, friends or other acquaintances. I think this might be some sort of record, where after months at court, we still don't know much more about the accused than the day we into court. I can understand the defences strategy, they must know/think he's guilty so the least said the better, but what I don't understand is the prosecutions lack of witness's? Surely they could have at supeanered some witness's to give evidence regarding his personality, life history or something!!
Prosecution: Nearly 1 day (96% or more of a day)I propose a guessing contest for the length of closing addresses. Not sure what first prize would be yet. Winner is closest to the actual time.
My guesses:
Prosecution 1 day
Defence 40 minutes.
Prosecution: Nearly 1 day (96% or more of a day)
Defence: barely anything (4% or less of the day)
Yeah that sounds about right. I’ll stick with that guess haha.You could have acted even more ungallantly by bidding 1 day less 1 second for the prosecution
A full day is two 80 minute sessions in the morning and 105 minutes in the afternoon or 265 minutes. 4% of that is around 10 minutes.
My guess ( if one day equals aprox 265 minutes)I propose a guessing contest for the length of closing addresses. Not sure what first prize would be yet. Winner is closest to the actual time.
My guesses:
Prosecution 1 day
Defence 40 minutes.
Edit: I'm being serious!! (for once)
My guess is guilty all three and defence will seek an appeal