Current Claremont Murders - The Bunker

Is Bradley Edwards the Mystery Man in the CCTV?

  • Yes

    Votes: 28 82.4%
  • No

    Votes: 6 17.6%

  • Total voters
    34

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
If anyone has a clearer photo please post that
I've done a reverse image search. This is the highest resolution and is 316 x 421 which is pretty much Super-VHS resolution. I expect it's a still from a video camera in a press helicopter.
Here is the clearest copy I have.
Hope it helps.

Note: Have added zoomed in copy from same image for convenience.


35409B65-40FD-416C-9295-C0ABA6335B37.jpeg 6B1297EB-8A86-4680-B06E-FC25D3EFF7FD.jpeg
 
Here is the clearest copy I have.
Hope it helps.

Note: Have added zoomed in copy from same image for convenience.


View attachment 812766View attachment 812763

That's an awful lot better than what I could dig up. And yes, that is a left arm on blue-shirt and whiteshirt now appears to be a woman.

Still not sure if it's a higher resolution image, or someone has done some remarkably good work enhancing the video footage.
 
I think the two white dots may be his hands/gloves. The biege mark on his shoulder is likely part of a video camera support assembly. Remember back then video cameras were large shoulder-borne devices. The biege assembly on his back is also likely part of the camera system.
Nope. It's clearly his arm and the skin colour of his arm matches the colour of his face - and he's wearing a yellowish glove on his left hand. It looks as if the video camera or camera is tucked under his right arm. There's no assembly showing on his back so we'll have to agree to disagree on this.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Nope. It's clearly his arm and the skin colour of his arm matches the colour of his face - and he's wearing a yellowish glove on his left hand. It looks as if the video camera or camera is tucked under his right arm. There's no assembly showing on on his back so we'll have to agree to disagree on this.
To me, its not a glove on his left hand, but a patch of light, that is coming through the trees, you can see this in other spots in the pic. His left hand appears to be lifting up his glasses as he looks up to the sky, probably looking at the helicopter. It looks like every one has stopped, with their hands on their hips, annoyed that the helicopter is going over and possibly disturbing the crime scene. He 'probably' is holding some sort of camera.
I can see a black area, possibly the body, but really can't make anything out.
What i find more worrying about this pic is that most are dressed in dark blue!!
 
To me, its not a glove on his left hand, but a patch of light, that is coming through the trees, you can see this in other spots in the pic. His left hand appears to be lifting up his glasses as he looks up to the sky, probably looking at the helicopter. It looks like every one has stopped, with their hands on their hips, annoyed that the helicopter is going over and possibly disturbing the crime scene. He 'probably' is holding some sort of camera.
I can see a black area, possibly the body, but really can't make anything out.
What i find more worrying about this pic is that most are dressed in dark blue!!
Disagree. I definitely see him wearing a glove and he's covering his forehead with his left hand and looking up a bit, clear as day to me. May be something to do with the helicopter overhead. Appears to be holding a video camera under his right arm. The guy in blue bottom left also looks as though he has some type of camera or something. But yes, the dark blue!!
 
Disagree. I definitely see him wearing a glove and he's covering his forehead with his left hand and looking up a bit, clear as day to me. May be something to do with the helicopter overhead. Appears to be holding a video camera under his right arm. The guy in blue bottom left also looks as though he has some type of camera or something. But yes, the dark blue!!
Its amazing how we all see something different, glad we are not witnesses for some one because they would be in trouble :)
 
803FD390-712D-4524-BFB6-B22B6D455E41.jpeg

I get the feeling that Ciara’s body is in this area. The reason being that the large camera appears to be pointing in this area & the area is much drier than the rest of the photo. If the photo is prior to all the foliage being removed from the body, then this foliage would be dry as it was removed from trees, shrubs etc to cover the body, obviously drying it out.

Yes, there is a lot of blue in that photo & I am hoping & presuming that it has already been tested & ruled out as being the same as the Telstra blue by the prosecution if raised by the defence.
 
Here is the clearest copy I have.
Hope it helps.

Note: Have added zoomed in copy from same image for convenience.


View attachment 812766View attachment 812763
I see different things every time I look at this picture 🙄.

from police/witness statementS (will need to check back) I recall a few making comment of seeing the rump or butt - which stood out to me. One would think even if laying in front the butt wouldn’t be something you would necessarily say you saw first and remember in recall the positioning of the bodies must have been staged in some sort of awkward way...

Sorry 😐. Just something that stood out to me and sounds awful if he staged bodies after death in some weird position. (If not already horrible enough)
 
I’m interested if anyone has noticed any similarities to other known serial killers in MO?
(from limited information we know at current)

thoughts on:
1. If you think the killer has produced his own sick playbook ?
2. If the killer has taken note from another killers MO ?
 
I see different things every time I look at this picture 🙄.

from police/witness statementS (will need to check back) I recall a few making comment of seeing the rump or butt - which stood out to me. One would think even if laying in front the butt wouldn’t be something you would necessarily say you saw first and remember in recall the positioning of the bodies must have been staged in some sort of awkward way...

Sorry 😐. Just something that stood out to me and sounds awful if he staged bodies after death in some weird position. (If not already horrible enough)
The rump comment was about Jane.
 
I see different things every time I look at this picture 🙄.

from police/witness statementS (will need to check back) I recall a few making comment of seeing the rump or butt - which stood out to me. One would think even if laying in front the butt wouldn’t be something you would necessarily say you saw first and remember in recall the positioning of the bodies must have been staged in some sort of awkward way...

Sorry 😐. Just something that stood out to me and sounds awful if he staged bodies after death in some weird position. (If not already horrible enough)
I found 4 bodies there! 😂
 
View attachment 812817

I get the feeling that Ciara’s body is in this area. The reason being that the large camera appears to be pointing in this area & the area is much drier than the rest of the photo. If the photo is prior to all the foliage being removed from the body, then this foliage would be dry as it was removed from trees, shrubs etc to cover the body, obviously drying it out.

Yes, there is a lot of blue in that photo & I am hoping & presuming that it has already been tested & ruled out as being the same as the Telstra blue by the prosecution if raised by the defence.
Does any one think this pic has been 'doctored' (so we can't see the body clearly) ? As this pic has been made public, maybe it was too graphic??
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

View attachment 812817

I get the feeling that Ciara’s body is in this area. The reason being that the large camera appears to be pointing in this area & the area is much drier than the rest of the photo. If the photo is prior to all the foliage being removed from the body, then this foliage would be dry as it was removed from trees, shrubs etc to cover the body, obviously drying it out.

Yes, there is a lot of blue in that photo & I am hoping & presuming that it has already been tested & ruled out as being the same as the Telstra blue by the prosecution if raised by the defence.
Zooming in close I can see Ciara's body in front of the woman who has her hands on her hips - to the right of the yellow circle.
 
All I can see with that high definition photo, is all the people standing around the body, possibly contaminating some evidence and destroying other evidence.
There is no possible excuse for having so many people being so close - it wasn't a forensic training exercise.
Who on earth were all those people and why did they all have to be there doing nothing at the same time.
No wonder so many things have got stuffed up.
 
I found an archived interesting article from The West Australian in an interview with Supt Caporn by Tony Barrass dated 1 June 2001 saying-

What Godsend do you need to get a result on this?
It would help us to know where these murders took place. We know that the young women were not killed where they were found, so the actual murder scene could provide extensive forensics for us. There are items that were missing from the girls, jewellery and clothing, so if they were to turn up, that would help dramatically. A confession would be nice. Look, we have two of the disposal sites. We have an absolute on the pick-up site for Ciara. We don't have the exact pick-up sites for Jane and Sarah and we don't have the murder sites for all of them. If we could somehow find those murder sites, obviously it would go a long way to helping us solve the case.
 
I found an archived interesting article from The West Australian in an interview with Supt Caporn by Tony Barrass dated 1 June 2001 saying-

What Godsend do you need to get a result on this?
It would help us to know where these murders took place. We know that the young women were not killed where they were found, so the actual murder scene could provide extensive forensics for us. There are items that were missing from the girls, jewellery and clothing, so if they were to turn up, that would help dramatically. A confession would be nice. Look, we have two of the disposal sites. We have an absolute on the pick-up site for Ciara. We don't have the exact pick-up sites for Jane and Sarah and we don't have the murder sites for all of them. If we could somehow find those murder sites, obviously it would go a long way to helping us solve the case.

That was one of the articles that had most of us believing there was a second crime scene/location after the abductions and before the final stop.

Edit: Now appears to have been an exercise in deliberately misinforming the public.
 
That was one of the articles that had most of us believing there was a second crime scene/location after the abductions and before the final stop.

Edit: Now appears to have been an exercise in deliberately misinforming the public.
I didn't get any of what Caporn said.
Did he know where CG got picked up - no.
He should have known JR was calling out for help and murdered shortly afterwards, which should take someone with half a brain to the crime scene.
What was he expecting from the crime scene - a business card of the culprit.
It would have helped the case enormously if Macro and Caporn never entered into it, that would be a godsend.
"A confession would be nice" - what a complete idiot.
 
I didn't get any of what Caporn said

Seems he was just not the right man for the job.

I understand completely and agree that some information should be held back from the public but to reel off a spiel that's absolute BS I don't when they don't have to say anything at all. It's so rude.
 
Seems he was just not the right man for the job.

I understand completely and agree that some information should be held back from the public but to reel off a spiel that's absolute BS I don't when they don't have to say anything at all. It's so rude.
No wonder Debbie Marshall targeted Dave Caporn in her book! He was absolutely useless.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top