Brand clearly with a case of the Davo'sYou would have been better than Brand!
Chubberson may enlighten us ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Brand clearly with a case of the Davo'sYou would have been better than Brand!
Chubberson may enlighten us ...
Brand clearly with a case of the Davo's
He is everything and more we would be bottom 4 if it werent for him
Buckley apparently highlighting opposition defence blocking Cox run at ball. Seems like it could be an issue a number of clubs having problems with.
Perhaps Clarko is not quite the belligerent, whinging loser sone of press making him out to be.
Fantastic article! Thanx for posting.
Yeah.... Prior opportunity.
Forgive me for not spending my precious time for not trying to google the exact incident and instead relying on my ageing memory. I cannot recall the exact game or who the tackler was but my memory is very clear regarding the incident.
I, and for that matter the football world, had never heard of the term 'Prior Opportunity' until a final (sometime in the 90s) between North and Hawthorn.
Ray Jencke of Hawthorn had broken loose and was running along the right defensive flank. He had a couple of bounces and was caught from behind but just before he was caught he correctly disposed of the ball. He was penalised for holding the ball because he had 'Prior Opportunity' to dispose of the ball. That decision changed the whole momentum of the game and North went on to win.
In the TV wash up of it Peter Knights and Crackers Keenan clashed over the Umpires decision. Knights said it was a blatantly wrong decision and that there is really no such thing as prior opportunity and that it actually cost Hawthorn the game. Keenan said 'I knew you would say that because you're biased'
Like, what is prior opportunity? The tackling rule is quite simple. If you are tackled with the ball and cannot legally dispose of it (throwing or dropping the ball is not legally disposing of it. There used to be a rule applied Dropping The Ball.) then the ball carrier is penalised for holding the ball Even IF HIS ARMS ARE LOCKED which indicates a good tackle and the tackler is rewarded.
Can anyone imagine the change it would bring to today's game if that rule was applied. The Umpire would make the instant decision of holding the ball and the whole game would open up. It would be the end of Sydney's mobile wrestling game and Geelong's illegal disposal of the ball that all clubs now copy.
As I write this my memory clears a little and what may have happened was that Jencke was tackled from behind being pushed in the back and driven into the ground a clear in the back penalty. The Umpire dreamed up the prior opportunity bullshite and we have been stuck with it ever since.
.
Brown was not a drinker? The day he walked past the Cafe at Waverley with a slab on his shoulder he must have been getting it for a mate. Mind you this was much later than 2007 though so things might have changed.......
Round 6 1997.
North had no Wayne Carey, we had no Shane Crawford.
Shocking decision.
View attachment 503537
Your a genius mate. I actually thought it was a final. Do you remember the incident and the controversy after the game?
Yes. Here’s the video. It’s at about the nine and a half minute mark.