Thread starter
#1
Just amazed at the public lobbying orchestrated by Mick Malthouse and now his aging fullback Clement, to maintain the FB push-in-the-back immunity rule. Smacks of blatant self-interest I think. The young full backs have had no problem adjusting, but the oldies like Michael, Fletcher and Clement seem to be having hissy fits over it. Quite revealing. So, did Clement have the best interest of the game in mind, or is he concerned that this rule correction will end his career? 

