Teams Cleveland Browns - GPODAWUND [sic]

Remove this Banner Ad

I seriously hope our fans can give Kessler time, I actually really like the tools he has.
He's more of a grinder, a mover of the chains. I like that.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Fart Cummings Haha, we never can.
We can't go any further down mate.

Also, calling it.
Kessler will be that QB we have been waiting for, for so long, to take us back to mediocrity.
 
Fart Cummings said:
so me and a mate decided to join another mate that's followed the browns for a few years now!

been listening to Cleveland Browns Daily geez Nathan Zagura stays positive!

oh well cant be accused of jumping on the bandwagon!
Click to expand...

Nathan Zegura =

iim_gettysburg.jpg
 
Fart Cummings said:
Crazy bad start to the year! Who we taking with Pick 1?
Click to expand...

This shows how dumb a "four year plan" is in the NFL. I go back to what I said about this regime months ago--unqualified to be running football ops.

They aren't picking at 1, these guys are trading down for 2019 draft picks
 
AmericanCrow said:
This shows how dumb a "four year plan" is in the NFL. I go back to what I said about this regime months ago--unqualified to be running football ops.

They aren't picking at 1, these guys are trading down for 2019 draft picks
Click to expand...

Will set up the next coach and FO for another 4 year plan at least :D
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wentz still "not worth" pick 2, huh, you Brown's management defenders? :$

Looking more and more like the Julio Jones deal each week, potentially worse :D
 
It's still an unfinished trade.

Who's to say we wont pick a QB at #1 next year, who turns out to be a better player than Wentz? Could end up with a franchise QB, #1 WR and another first round pick. And really, Wentz would have looked like s**t playing for the Browns anyway. He'd have been injured week 1 after taking 10 sacks. It's not like he'd have the same numbers. He's done very well to come up against 2 bad teams and 1 team who won't play that bad again to start his career though.
 
Chris25 said:
So, Dak Prescott and Trevor Siemian are guns too. Lots of clubs must have stuffed up then.
Click to expand...
He was there for the taking. It's true he would've been destroyed at the Browns but your FO assessment of him was wrong.
 
manureid said:
He would be stinking it up at the Browns right now if they took him. They are a lot further than 1 player away from being good. Anyway, Pryor looks the goods! :p
Click to expand...
Poor campaigner had to run, throw AND catch. Can't do it all.
 
I think people underestimate what a bad team would do to a rookie QB. Wentz wouldn't have had his 3 weeks at the Browns. He'd have 3 losses, taken lots of sacks and thrown a few interceptions. And a season of losses doesn't exactly give the perception of a franchise QB. There's basis to the idea that it's better to bring a 'franchise' rookie into a strong team, rather than the other way around.

Kadog said:
He was there for the taking. It's true he would've been destroyed at the Browns but your FO assessment of him was wrong.
Click to expand...

It was an unnecessary comment from DePodesta. But really, it's been 3 games. Wentz could easily be a Stafford or Cutler level QB in the long term.
 
Chris25 said:
I think people underestimate what a bad team would do to a rookie QB. Wentz wouldn't have had his 3 weeks at the Browns. He'd have 3 losses, taken lots of sacks and thrown a few interceptions. And a season of losses doesn't exactly give the perception of a franchise QB. There's basis to the idea that it's better to bring a 'franchise' rookie into a strong team, rather than the other way around.



It was an unnecessary comment from DePodesta. But really, it's been 3 games. Wentz could easily be a Stafford or Cutler level QB in the long term.
Click to expand...
Fair post. Disagree with you lumping Staff with that piece of garbage Cutler. Staff level would be a pass mark for Wentz.
 
Chris25 said:
I think people underestimate what a bad team would do to a rookie QB. Wentz wouldn't have had his 3 weeks at the Browns. He'd have 3 losses, taken lots of sacks and thrown a few interceptions. And a season of losses doesn't exactly give the perception of a franchise QB. There's basis to the idea that it's better to bring a 'franchise' rookie into a strong team, rather than the other way around.
Click to expand...

lol, i dont think you realise how bad the Eagles were last year and how bad their o-line still is. Wentz is a ******* monster, HE HAS MADE THAT TEAM BETTER, nearly single handedly, side step it all you want, he was there for the taking and you didnt take him for whatever reason, he will be a star for years, a franchise QB if ive ever seen one. How you can sit there and defend Browns management is beyond me.
 
Last edited:
Chris25 said:
I'm perfectly happy.

We'll be a much better team for when we do draft our franchise QB.
Click to expand...
Problem is, that opportunity already came and Wentz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top