Climate Change Arguing

Remove this Banner Ad

Declaring my opinion as wrong? How Trumpian of you.

Questioning science is a process that must be undergone to understand the science and I encourage that. Once you've come to understand the science you then have to accept or deny it. And well the overwhelming scientific consensus is that climate change is real, if one properly understands climate science they should accept it.

I think those who deny it go in with biases (largely political) and engage in very limited study to confirm those biases. Much like Kelly and his efforts to take the words of scientists out of context.

And absolutely people can have whatever opinion they want about what action (or inaction) to take but the science is solid.

Yep, I'm about fixing it .... preaching will never take us forward.
 
Most governments in the world have had inadequate responses to the situation we are in, and calling them out is actually an accurate summation of the situation. It’s only seen in a negative light by people who are determined to fight the changes all the way.
This new tack recalitrants are being forced into trying-‘l just want to know how....I just don‘t like alarmists....But China...’ and so forth. lol. Give it a spell-that’s just last refuge stuff.
You’ll get there in the end Kwality because you won’t have a choice.

You are one of those who will never be a part of the solution .... you can deny China all you like. Yes I want to know how !!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Climate change alarmist is a strange term for people who advocate for listening to scientists, or the experts.

But sure, let's all drink daddy murdoch's kool-aid til we all think like him at least then he won't have to circulate his toilet paper.
 
Climate change alarmist is a strange term for people who advocate for listening to scientists, or the experts.

But sure, let's all drink daddy murdoch's kool-aid til we all think like him at least then he won't have to circulate his toilet paper.

Alarmists don’t read or listen to scientists. They stay within an echo chamber and read headlines from publications which suit the narrative they want to hear.

These are the same people who go ballistic if you don’t hate trump, weren’t pro brexit or don’t hate Israel.

For them it’s “Your either with us or against us and hurry up and pick a side”

Objective people don’t get hysterical about any of these issues and float somewhere in the middle seeking more information before forming an opinion, if at all, as most are busy getting on with life. I think someone labelled them the “quiet Australians”
 
EWjWi5l.jpg



Bingo!

hRpSAGB.jpg


Justinian 21 January
 
Alarmists don’t read or listen to scientists. They stay within an echo chamber and read headlines from publications which suit the narrative they want to hear.

These are the same people who go ballistic if you don’t hate trump, weren’t pro brexit or don’t hate Israel.

For them it’s “Your either with us or against us and hurry up and pick a side”

Objective people don’t get hysterical about any of these issues and float somewhere in the middle seeking more information before forming an opinion, if at all, as most are busy getting on with life. I think someone labelled them the “quiet Australians”
What a load of sweeping rubbish.
 

Uh oh, Turnbull became a climate alarmist because he listens to science. I believe this is the point where anyone who doesn't agree with him will say "I wish these angry past PMs would stay out of politics".
 
One day in 2017, Peter pulled up to an injection well in Cambridge, Ohio. A worker walked around his truck with a hand-held radiation detector, he says, and told him he was carrying one of the “hottest loads” he’d ever seen. It was the first time Peter had heard any mention of the brine being radioactive.

The Earth’s crust is in fact peppered with radioactive elements that concentrate deep underground in oil-and-gas-bearing layers. This radioactivity is often pulled to the surface when oil and gas is extracted — carried largely in the brine.

In the popular imagination, radioactivity conjures images of nuclear meltdowns, but radiation is emitted from many common natural substances, usually presenting a fairly minor risk. Many industry representatives like to say the radioactivity in brine is so insignificant as to be on par with what would be found in a banana or a granite countertop, so when Peter demanded his supervisor tell him what he was being exposed to, his concerns were brushed off; the liquid in his truck was no more radioactive than “any room of your home,” he was told. But Peter wasn’t so sure.






“A lot of guys are coming up with cancer, or sores and skin lesions that take months to heal,” he says. Peter experiences regular headaches and nausea, numbness in his fingertips and face, and “joint pain like fire.”

He says he wasn’t given any safety instructions on radioactivity, and while he is required to wear steel-toe boots, safety glasses, a hard hat, and clothes with a flash-resistant coating, he isn’t required to wear a respirator or a dosimeter to measure his radioactivity exposure — and the rest of the uniform hardly offers protection from brine. “It’s all over your hands, and inside your boots, and on the cuticles of your toes, and any cuts you have — you’re soaked,” he says.

So Peter started quietly taking samples of the brine he hauled, filling up old antifreeze containers or soda bottles. Eventually, he packed a shed in his backyard with more than 40 samples. He worried about further contamination but says, for him, “the damage is already done.” He wanted answers. “I cover my ass,” he says. “Ten or 15 years down the road, if I get sick, I want to be able to prove this.”

Through a grassroots network of Ohio activists, Peter was able to transfer 11 samples of brine to the Center for Environmental Research and Education at Duquesne University, which had them tested in a lab at the University of Pittsburgh. The results were striking.

Radium, typically the most abundant radionuclide in brine, is often measured in picocuries per liter of substance and is so dangerous it’s subject to tight restrictions even at hazardous-waste sites. The most common isotopes are radium-226 and radium-228, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires industrial discharges to remain below 60 for each. Four of Peter’s samples registered combined radium levels above 3,500, and one was more than 8,500.

“It’s ridiculous that these drivers are not being told what’s in their trucks,” says John Stolz, Duquesne’s environmental-center director. “And this stuff is on every corner — it is in neighborhoods. Truckers don’t know they’re being exposed to radioactive waste, nor are they being provided with protective clothing.

More here:

 
“Never waste a good crisis”, the politicians always say.

Watch Scomo and Dutto use climate change as a golden opportunity to steal away our freedoms, to intrude even further into citizens’ lives.

“In Australia in 2019, politicians spent more time discussing how best to punish environmental protesters than they did devising legislation that might protect the climate.“

Says it all.


 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Because this is principally a football forum...

Climate change alarmists, and specifically those that have contributed to the last few pages, remind me of the deluded Carlton supporters circa 2011.

'You know we're coming'

'Can you smell what we're cooking?'

All talk. No substance.

And we all know how that has ended up...
Well if you choose to flagrantly ignore everything that eminently-qualified scientists have told you, you would say that.

Not being a scientist, I trust their expertise. Like most sane rational people do a hundred times a day just to survive.

That's not to say that you're not free to challenge their advice scientifically.

What are your qualifications, to call them into question?
 
Climate change is about breaking records isn’t it? We are one rain event away from smashing our record rainfall for January so maybe this climate change is real! Getting 3 times your average rainfall in the middle of the fire season, such a terrible thing.
 
If the shoe fits, what's the problem?

How else do we describe people who choose to vandalise any sort of scientific discussion of the terrifying threat from climate change?

I'm perfectly comfortable with all of those terms in this instance.

Meaningless name calling by a wannabe elitist. People can & do think for themselves, like it or not.
 
Oh yes, it's well established that governments always act only in the best interest of the people.

Poor attempt at ignoring why China continues to build power stations .... why Pakistan, Vietnam continue to increase power generation.
The obvious question is why not renewables, dont they have the same abacus that we use?
 
Poor attempt at ignoring why China continues to build power stations .... why Pakistan, Vietnam continue to increase power generation.
The obvious question is why not renewables, dont they have the same abacus that we use?
So let's do nothing. It's clear that's what you want.

And before you come back with "I just think it's important to make sure we don't exacerbate the situation by choosing the wrong approach" (like it's still 1993, not 2020), read this and then let me know if there's anything you don't understand.

And stop wasting everyone's time with pathetic little objections.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top