Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yeah, climate change isnt a cult at all. 1 reply and 3 of you jump up and down within 20 mins. Very calm, level headed people indeed.
Given china is going to use so much coal no matter what anyone does, and we have almost no limit of it here, and ours is significantly cleaner than theirs is (better for the environment). Stop the ridiculous hoops for our mines to operate and ship it to china at extortionate prices. Use that money to progress renewables here effectively and not rushed as they are all around the world.How involved are the CCP in the actual profits for those mines? Is there an economic incentive in it for the individuals involved; not the country being in need of power, but the people in government and government business using the excuse as a method of lining their own pockets?
Is it actually cheaper to open the mines, or is it because it's the easiest means of semi-corrupt (or openly corrupt) personal enrichment via insider trading and conflicts of interest?
It's an interesting dilemma to solve - how to convert to renewables when cheap power drives development - but I think it's just as interesting that when considering this that the capitalism of it all isn't really considered.
How involved are the CCP in the actual profits for those mines? Is there an economic incentive in it for the individuals involved; not the country being in need of power, but the people in government and government business using the excuse as a method of lining their own pockets?
Is it actually cheaper to open the mines, or is it because it's the easiest means of semi-corrupt (or openly corrupt) personal enrichment via insider trading and conflicts of interest?
It's an interesting dilemma to solve - how to convert to renewables when cheap power drives development - but I think it's just as interesting that when considering this that the capitalism of it all isn't really considered.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Phasing out coal is not nonsensical at all, in fact it's the only thing that makes sense. There is no such thing as clean coal, stop saying that you're embarrassing yourself.Given china is going to use so much coal no matter what anyone does, and we have almost no limit of it here, and ours is significantly cleaner than theirs is (better for the environment). Stop the ridiculous hoops for our mines to operate and ship it to china at extortionate prices. Use that money to progress renewables here effectively and not rushed as they are all around the world.
Sadly, the way our government behaves there is little insensitive for a coal mine to expand or even operate. 40% royalties brought in without consultation made qld uninvestable. Insane hoops to open a new mine. They've cut the supply driving the price up rather than work together to help everyone. Frankly, our government and the climate cult are clueless but the inmates are running the asylum so we cut our nose to spite our face.
Coal is being forced out, we all see that, but there could have been much more advantage to everyone than dribblers yelling "COAL BAD ME NO LIKE COAL IT MUST NOT EXIST" which was always nonsensical. Now, the us against them attitude from both sides beyond repair and billions will just be paid to shareholders (where else can it go now?), which will then upset the same morons as they hate franking credits. See a theme here as to who the problem might be?
Likewise oil and gas companies
Dont get me started on the amount of people who moan about coal yet dont know the difference between met and thermal. Id bet this is a huge proportion of activists too
Basic science is a cult? Lol . Give us all a break old man. You're in the Sky News cult of lies, lies , lies.Yeah, climate change isnt a cult at all. 1 reply and 3 of you jump up and down within 20 mins. Very calm, level headed people indeed.
I reckon the cult of nihilistic, contrarian “climate skepticism” is worse. Definitely has the “in a sea of sheeple, we know the truth” vibe that a lot of cults do.Yeah, climate change isnt a cult at all. 1 reply and 3 of you jump up and down within 20 mins. Very calm, level headed people indeed.
Phasing out coal is not nonsensical at all, in fact it's the only thing that makes sense. There is no such thing as clean coal, stop saying that you're embarrassing yourself.
Activists know a bit more than the tired coal lobby views you make and your coal share investments that you're proud of.
You need to read some year7 science books so you have more of a handle in what you're talking about , otherwise you sound a bit brainwashed and ignorant.
I don't know, ask the experts. Renewables need investment from govt. There has been a criminal lack of investment in this country.What year would you like all coal completely removed and how confident are you that renewables will completely do the job by that same time?
I have a small, partial answer.So what’s the plan then?
Okay it’s 2024 and the loony cultists have gotten off their collective high horse and no longer judge, or even confront the people who say it’s all too hard. Carbon emissions and the temperature anomaly continue to rise.
What now?
Some of the renewable lobby doesn't want compromise though, it's all renewable right now and nothing else.Doing simple things like identifying the dirtiest coal fired power stations in the world and replacing them asap even if it is with state of the art gas might yield some good value for money.
I guess that was my point. Reducing emissions should be more important than building renewables. Reducing emissions now has value versus reducing emissions over the next 10 years. Building renewables provides some reduction in emissions, but at a world level there may be other value for money options that could be taken up.Some of the renewable lobby doesn't want compromise though, it's all renewable right now and nothing else.
Great post, and totes agree with you.I guess that was my point. Reducing emissions should be more important than building renewables. Reducing emissions now has value versus reducing emissions over the next 10 years. Building renewables provides some reduction in emissions, but at a world level there may be other value for money options that could be taken up.
I think that's an interesting perspective, but I'd like to extend the lens put upon the CCP over here, too.Given china is going to use so much coal no matter what anyone does, and we have almost no limit of it here, and ours is significantly cleaner than theirs is (better for the environment). Stop the ridiculous hoops for our mines to operate and ship it to china at extortionate prices. Use that money to progress renewables here effectively and not rushed as they are all around the world.
Sadly, the way our government behaves there is little insensitive for a coal mine to expand or even operate. 40% royalties brought in without consultation made qld uninvestable. Insane hoops to open a new mine. They've cut the supply driving the price up rather than work together to help everyone. Frankly, our government and the climate cult are clueless but the inmates are running the asylum so we cut our nose to spite our face.
Coal is being forced out, we all see that, but there could have been much more advantage to everyone than dribblers yelling "COAL BAD ME NO LIKE COAL IT MUST NOT EXIST" which was always nonsensical. Now, the us against them attitude from both sides beyond repair and billions will just be paid to shareholders (where else can it go now?), which will then upset the same morons as they hate franking credits. See a theme here as to who the problem might be?
Likewise oil and gas companies
Dont get me started on the amount of people who moan about coal yet dont know the difference between met and thermal. Id bet this is a huge proportion of activists too
Dumb as **** and dangerousI don't know, ask the experts. Renewables need investment from govt. There has been a criminal lack of investment in this country.
First step is stopping all new fossil fuel projects today. Taking away all fossil fuel subsidies.Then phasing out exports by 2030.
Not what i said. Learn to read if you're going to arguePhasing out coal is not nonsensical at all, in fact it's the only thing that makes sense. There is no such thing as clean coal, stop saying that you're embarrassing yourself.
Activists know a bit more than the tired coal lobby views you make and your coal share investments that you're proud of.
You need to read some year7 science books so you have more of a handle in what you're talking about , otherwise you sound a bit brainwashed and ignorant.
More abuse from Burge as usual. The man with coal shares sharing his wisdom.Dumb as * and dangerous
Poorer countries need it to keep the heating on. Stop being selfish
Clean coal. Lol.Not what i said. Learn to read if you're going to argue
Try again
Again not what i said. Learn to read pleaseClean coal. Lol.
You use the term clean coal all the time and you have coal shares and want coal mines to expand so you can make more money.Again not what i said. Learn to read please
Your reading comprehension is at a 2nd grade level. Stop arguing with people if you arent able to take in and understand what they sayYou use the term clean coal all the time and you have coal shares and want coal mines to expand so you can make more money.
Again not what i said. Learn to read please
Don't be abusive, your post was coal lobby rubbish and you don't understand basic science.Your reading comprehension is at a 2nd grade level. Stop arguing with people if you arent able to take in and understand what they say
What many of the children don't understand, if the we and many parts of the West hadn't had to fight our own anti science community, we could have been able to have a large influence in pushing controls on products produced by coal.Don't be abusive, your post was coal lobby rubbish and you don't understand basic science.