Politics Climate Change Paradox (cont in part 2)

[Crankitup]

Who is John Reid? what are his credentials?

LOL. Let's see. I gave you his occupation, details of who he worked for and the length of that employment. What else do you want? His address? His star sign? Are you telling me you can't use Google now?? Stop acting like an arsecarrot.

I dont trust your links ...

That's good, because in this instance I didn't give you one. Which begs the question why the * you are complaining.

specially after you were busted lying about Tim Ball's claims

That's news to me. Please provide evidence of this busting.

if its fake how did Hansen (despite denier attempts of defaming) get it right?

Referring to James Hansen I presume? The mathematician & physicist James Hansen. If he was a skeptic that's how his credentials would be noted. Instead of that he's referred to in the MSM as a climate scientist. In a similar vein, I referred to Dr Zbigniew Jaworowski as an ice core scientist only to have you complain that he was a "professor of atomic radation". Obviously you don't know much about the study of ice cores or you would know that it's precisely his expertise in that field (atomic radiation) that made him eminently qualified for ice core research and why he reported to UNSCEAR, IAEA, and UNEP. In fact he was a chairman of the UNSCEAR. Nevertheless ... because he disagrees with the orthodoxy you dismissed his revelations about pre-industrial CO₂ levels etc.

 

[Total Power]

Referring to James Hansen I presume? The mathematician & physicist James Hansen. If he was a skeptic that's how his credentials would be noted. Instead of that he's referred to in the MSM as a climate scientist.

I have no words, just no words. You can't even google. This is beyond ridiculous

James Hansen - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Not trying to insult you, but do you have a disability?

 

[Crankitup]

I have no words, just no words. You can't even google. This is beyond ridiculous

James Hansen - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Not trying to insult you, but do you have a disability?

You think I haven't seen that page?? What are his degrees in again numnutz? Right there on your wikipedia page.

 

[Crankitup]

So you find the NASA and NOAA graph agreeing with your graph? i thought you are just a liar now i see you are just incapable of reasoning.

My bad. A 5 year old can tell the difference but not you.

lol i just posted for the lulz, you can compile all my misinterpretation but none will come close to what you delivered in the last 10 pages.You dont even know what you are posting and whom you are quoting. Polish doctor, architect and some CSIRO scientist no one can find anywhere. LOL..

I mean its a ******* graph.....and you can't spot the difference? rofl. There is no point, i am banging my head against the wall


xx

Still persisting with the idea my graph is fake?

This graph is from a peer-reviewed journal: https://gavinpublishers.com/article...577-0640/the-true-and-false-of-climate-change

The writers are:

M. Ray Thomasson, Chairman, Thomasson Partner Associates Inc., Denver Colorado, USA

Lee C. Gerhard Principal Geologist, Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, USA (retired)

I expect to hear an apology from you in your next response. I won't hold my breath though. You're too proud to ever admit a mistake.

 

[Total Power]

You think I haven't seen that page?? What are his degrees in again numnutz? Right there on your wikipedia page.

Do you understand the link between astronomy and climate science? (but then again you dont know how ocean currents and climate are linked lol so...)

 

[Crankitup]

Do you understand the link between astronomy and climate science? (but then again you dont know how ocean currents and climate are linked lol so...)

You've missed the whole point I've been trying to usher you towards so I see I'll have to spell it out for you. There is no objective criteria that can be used to determine who is a "climate scientist". The field of climate science is a very broad discipline that includes scientists from a variety of backgrounds. Very few climate scientists have a Ph.D. in Climatology like skeptical scientist Dr. Patrick J. Michaels. Well known alarmist scientists such as NASA's Gavin Schmidt of RealClimate.org has a Ph.D. in Mathematics, Phil Jones the Director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of Climategate fame has a Ph.D. in Hydrology, IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri has a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and Hockey Stick author Michael Mann has a Ph.D. in Geology.

So next time I post a reference from someone, before you holler "but they're not a climatologist" keep this in mind.

 

[Total Power]

Still persisting with the idea my graph is fake?

This graph is from a peer-reviewed journal: https://gavinpublishers.com/article...577-0640/the-true-and-false-of-climate-change

The writers are:

M. Ray Thomasson, Chairman, Thomasson Partner Associates Inc., Denver Colorado, USA

Lee C. Gerhard Principal Geologist, Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, USA (retired)

I expect to hear an apology from you in your next response. I won't hold my breath though. You're too proud to ever admit a mistake.

You really really don't get it...where is my facepalm meme?

Thomasson Partner Associates | Oil and Gas Exploration

Thomasson Partner Associates, Oil and Gas Exploration based in Denver, Colorado

tpaexpl.com

Please! don't ever reply to me. I think you are just trolling for the sake of it.

 

[Crankitup]

You really really don't get it...where is my facepalm meme?

Thomasson Partner Associates | Oil and Gas Exploration

Thomasson Partner Associates, Oil and Gas Exploration based in Denver, Colorado

tpaexpl.com

Please! don't ever reply to me. I think you are just trolling for the sake of it.

And that's meant to prove what precisely?

The 97% bogus consensus study you love so much was written by John Cook and Dana Nuccitelli. John Cook is at least partially funded by big oil seeing that he is a research assistant professor at George Mason University, which if we are to believe Kranky Al receives the overwhelming majority of it's funding from 'Big Oil' and the Koch Bros.

You tried to dismiss this before but I repeat, Cook is employed by George Mason University who the Koch Bros poured $50 million into (as well as receiving money from oil companies), all of which supposedly makes some of it's other scientists who are skeptical in AGW matters (Patrick Michaels & Fred Singer) compromised, but somehow through an unexplained mystical process John Cook remains as pure as the driven snow.

Dana Nuccitelli has been in the pay of Big Oil for 14 years which you can verify by taking a squizz at his LinkedIn page.

 

[Total Power]

And that's meant to prove what precisely?

The 97% bogus consensus study you love so much was written by John Cook and Dana Nuccitelli. John Cook is at least partially funded by big oil seeing that he is a research assistant professor at George Mason University, which if we are to believe Kranky Al receives the overwhelming majority of it's funding from 'Big Oil' and the Koch Bros.

Dana Nuccitelli has been in the pay of Big Oil for 14 years which you can verify by taking a squizz at his LinkedIn page.

This is not even a study funded by an oil company, THIS IS A STUDY BY THE OIL COMPANY.

LOL.

My god, i think i lost half my IQ after this debate.

 

[Total Power]

LOL enough, this is ridiculous, this is bordering on *ed levels now. Debate/or agree with Snake and Fudge please, they will agree with you and give you likes.

 

[Crankitup]

This is not even a study funded by an oil company, THIS IS A STUDY BY THE OIL COMPANY.

LOL.

My god, i think i lost half my IQ after this debate.

You must have. An oil company can't conduct a study. People conduct studies.

The first author is a past President of the American Geosciences Institute and now runs a prospect generating firm (basically exploration). A prospect generating firm pitches potential projects to actual mining companies usually for a minority stake in the project.

The second author doesn't work for an actual mining company either. He works for the Kansas Geological Survey.

In any case they are not the original authors of the graph. They published the study last year but if you image search before 2019 the graph appears in many places in various forms. The authors of this study say the information the graph is based on comes from the following two studies ...

The Younger Dryas cold interval as viewed from central Greenland

Greenland ice-core records provide an exceptionally clear picture of many aspects of abrupt climate changes, and particularly of those associated with…

www.sciencedirect.com

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/96JC03981

Another random image to keep you responding. I wonder if UHI effects have compromised this station much in the years since it opened in 1909?

 

[Snake_Baker]

What actual scientists do when TP is talking bullshit on the internet.

Photocatalyst converts fatty acids to diesel and jet-fuel molecules selectively

Method provides petroleum-free way to turn industrial biowaste into valuable commodity

by Mitch Jacoby March 7, 2020

Industrial waste containing bioderived long-chain fatty acids could serve as sustainable feedstocks for diesel and jet fuels, which today are produced by refining petroleum sources. But several of the methods for removing oxygen from fatty acids to convert them to long-chain alkanes, the principal components of these fuels, require temperatures above 250 °C and high-pressure hydrogen, making them expensive and energy intensive.



Decarboxylation methods, which convert fatty acids to alkanes by stripping carbon dioxide groups, run under milder conditions. But these methods tend to suffer from low selectivity: they generate a distribution of desirable and undesirable products. Now, Zhipeng Huang, Zhitong Zhao, and Feng Wang of the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics and coworkers report that under mild conditions (30 °C and 0.2 MPa hydrogen) and in the presence of ultraviolet light, a Pt-TiO2 catalyst decarboxylates fatty acids selectively (Nat. Catal. 2020, DOI: 10.1038/s41929-020-0423-3). For example, the method converted pure stearic and linoleic acids to n-heptadecane in greater than 90% yield. In tests of crude soybean and tall-oil fatty acids, which are inedible by-products of soybean processing and the pulp industry, respectively, the method produced mixtures of long-chain alkanes at up to roughly 90% yield.

Photocatalyst converts fatty acids to diesel and jet-fuel molecules selectively

Method provides petroleum-free way to turn industrial biowaste into valuable commodity

cen.acs.org

 

[Total Power]

What actual scientists do when TP is talking bullshit on the internet.

So this isn't what you do, cool! what do you do then? other than post fake research? It's only bullshit cause i expose people like you, its not about climate change, it's about people like you being intellectually dishonest in posting biased research and fake graphs from blogs and hobby scientists. Please be honest, for once

 

[Fadge]

My god, i think i lost half my IQ after this debate.

What is half of something that is non-existent?

 

[Total Power]

What is half of something that is non-existent?

 

[Deliverance]

FFS you are a simpleton. I can't make it any clearer than my earlier post, in which I referenced and explained the relevant comments.

I think as this isn't the "teach Fadge to read"thread. I'll leave it then.

 

[Deliverance]

FFS you are a simpleton. I can't make it any clearer than my earlier post, in which I referenced and explained the relevant comments.

I think as this isn't the "teach Fadge to read" thread. I'll leave it then.
It does make me realise why you never actually discuss the issue in depth though.

 

[Deliverance]

FFS you are a simpleton. I can't make it any clearer than my earlier post, in which I referenced and explained the relevant comments.

I think as this isn't the "teach Fadge to read" thread. I'll leave it then.
It does make me realise why you never actually discuss the issue in depth though.

 

[Fadge]

I think as this isn't the "teach Fadge to read"thread. I'll leave it then.

OK, so it's confirmed - 'Climate Change causes greenhouse gases'.

Because Deliverance says so.

Nuffies will nuff.

 

[Deliverance]

Ok. Let me sc

OK, so it's confirmed - 'Climate Change causes greenhouse gases'.

Because Deliverance says so.

Nuffies will nuff.

Ok, let me scaffold it for you. Here's the original comment and in the brackets are the bits you were supposed to infer, but clearly didn't understand. You should be able to see your mistake now.

As far as I can tell it's only one factor (causing climate change currently). (It's) Greenhouse gases. Unless there's another cause (of modern climate change )I'm not seeing?

 

[Total Power]

Ok. Let me sc

Ok, let me scaffold it for you. Here's the original comment and in the brackets are the bits you were supposed to infer, but clearly didn't understand. You should be able to see your mistake now.

As far as I can tell it's only one factor (causing climate change currently). (It's) Greenhouse gases. Unless there's another cause (of modern climate change )I'm not seeing?

Way too much processing power needed.

 

[Fadge]

Ok. Let me sc

Ok, let me scaffold it for you. Here's the original comment and in the brackets are the bits you were supposed to infer, but clearly didn't understand. You should be able to see your mistake now.

As far as I can tell it's only one factor (causing climate change currently). (It's) Greenhouse gases. Unless there's another cause (of modern climate change )I'm not seeing?

Screenshot of the interchange, interestingly like by your fellow nuffie Total Fraud:

I think it's very clear who the intellectually challenged are...

 

[Total Power]

^^^ ROFL.

Deliverance , there is no point. Let it go through to the keeper.

Where is the darn facepalm emoji.

 

[Deliverance]

^^^ ROFL.

Deliverance , there is no point. Let it go through to the keeper.

Where is the darn facepalm emoji.

I know right. It's just in my nature to try and help people though. But you're on the money. This is beyond my capabilities.

 

[Fadge]

I know right. It's just in my nature to try and help people though. But you're on the money. This is beyond my capabilities.

I'm not sure your workmates would appreciate you sharing their pictures and email addresses in an on-line forum.