quotemokc
Brownlow Medallist
Instead they have the threat of a deadly virus.
City air pollution isn't climate change.
Politics Climate Change Paradox (cont in part 2)
- Thread starter RobbieGray17
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
City air pollution isn't climate change.
You have to be don't you?
Can you take a stance that the data is garbage and therefore there is no basis for a strong position either way?
This is the thing about folks who fall in to the "duopoly" of socio-political movements. They won't allow you to step out of the game once you take a critical stance of either position. Once this occurs, you're getting press ganged in to their narrow world view, whether you like it or not.
Leave science to the scientists, you stick to virtue signalling on figbooty.
He asked about the weather, not climate.
Just let him be, a man got to claim a victory, sometime, somewhere. Even if it's on figbooty on something juvenille. Till the next time Critical Fudgey reappears again...lol
So now we know folks, air pollution may not be climate, but it IS weather!
Did the whole globe cool as the whole globe is warming currently?
Almost every denier ever...
Five climate change science misconceptions debunked
The science of climate change is more than 150 years old and it is probably the most tested area of modern science. However the energy industry, political lobbyists and others have spent the last 30 years sowing doubt about the science where none really exists. The latest estimate is that the...
Looks like WA could be in for a bit of this.
www.sciencealert.com
40 Years of Data Confirm Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger. Climate Models Were Right
The most powerful storms on our planet have grown substantially stronger, and almost forty years' worth of hurricane satellite imagery suggest a warming planet might be fuelling the changes.
www.sciencealert.com
Yep, reads like a standard climate change study.Looks like WA could be in for a bit of this.
40 Years of Data Confirm Hurricanes Are Getting Stronger. Climate Models Were Right
The most powerful storms on our planet have grown substantially stronger, and almost forty years' worth of hurricane satellite imagery suggest a warming planet might be fuelling the changes.
'Ignore the fact the data is questionable...'
Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #7,936
Interesting to note that the linked article claims that "climate models were right", when the outline in the paper this clown has utilised as his source claims the direct opposite.
Bringing down these idiots is child's play. It's not even a challenge.
What they're doing is performing a study with a targeted conclusion, realising at some stage during the study that there is insufficient data to support their conclusion, but making definitive statements anyway.Interesting to note that the linked article claims that "climate models were right", when the outline in the paper this clown has utilised as his source claims the direct opposite.
View attachment 880470
Bringing down these idiots is child's play. It's not even a challenge.
And the alarmists lap it up without question, because it's consistent with what they want to believe.
Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #7,938
Correct. It's not science.
However, education, administrative and political funding is ultimately to blame for creating this production line of bad scientists.
Cognitive reinforcement.
Yes, that was previous data over time periods considered to be too short to be significant. This new study looked at longer time periods. Hence the enhanced confidence.Interesting to note that the linked article claims that "climate models were right", when the outline in the paper this clown has utilised as his source claims the direct opposite.
View attachment 880470
Bringing down these idiots is child's play. It's not even a challenge.
I was actually going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he had just read the heading and not the article or the source paper, because you couldn't possibly have read the detail and considered it worthy of supporting the argument of the climate change advocate.
But no, that doesn't appear to be the case.
But no, that doesn't appear to be the case.
Don't hurt Snake's feelings, remember he is a scientist, he even posted fake news 3 pages ago and got busted for it.
Interesting to note that the linked article claims that "climate models were right", when the outline in the paper this clown has utilised as his source claims the direct opposite.
View attachment 880470
Bringing down these idiots is child's play. It's not even a challenge.
Have you actually read the entire paper, oh wait, you never read past abstract. For someone claiming to be a 'scientist' you don't even read past one paragraph. READ the whole paper, idiot. This is what you do thread after thread, read 2 lines and run with it. You didn't get the context of the line you underlined did you? cause you didn't read the whole paper.
Carry on.
Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #7,945
I was referring to the tense utilised by the "journalist" Carly Cassella "Climate Models Were Right" which was then completely contradicted by the paper she utilised in her article:
You can't even interpret the criticisms correctly, you complete ******* moron. Did you get through your entire adolescence with velcro sneakers?!!
There are teenage christian creationists that can put forward a better science based debate than you.
Last edited:
I was wondering cause you haven't posted memes in a while, any chance you actually might want toread the paper before blowing your load? Scientists make an 'informed' opinion you know, which may or may not be right but scientists actually do that. You are not a scientists a-hole i realise that but hide behind a meme if you wish to, it doesn't make you look any more intelligent after you got busted just last week for posting fake news.
OMFG. Just when you thought you'd heard it all...
If actual scientists operated in the same way as climate scientists do, we'd already have access to a vaccine for COVID19.
'It may or may not be right', but what harm could it do?
LOL well done in deleting your pathetic attempt, credit when its due.
Second, yes i get your point, READ THE WHOLE PAPER, that's what i am suggest. THE NOAA PAPER available discusses how challenges like he mentioned above are addressed and tackled in modelling TC.'s.
Jesus
Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #7,950
I'd need a lobotomy in order to enter his conceptual field..
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
