- Sep 27, 2014
- 34,227
- 28,859
- AFL Club
- Essendon
The diggers fought bravely in 2 world wars so we can stand on top of that thing.
s**t post, you deserve the suspension. Uluru was as reachable as the Moon for Australians back then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
The diggers fought bravely in 2 world wars so we can stand on top of that thing.
Back when? In the 50's??s**t post, you deserve the suspension. Uluru was as reachable as the Moon for Australians back then.
Never said that, at least I don't use my bandwidth to post crazy conservative conspiracy theoriesYou sure do devote a lot of bandwidth to something you “literally could not care about”
White Australians? Nice touch of racism there. Ayers Rock belongs to ALL Australians, not just those who live locally and identify as indigenous. ALL Australians, not just the White ones, have the right to climb that rock.Oh s**t. White Australians being outraged that they cant literally walk all over aboriginal culture amymore. Super suprising
White Australians? Nice touch of racism there. Ayers Rock belongs to ALL Australians, not just those who live locally and identify as indigenous. ALL Australians, not just the White ones, have the right to climb that rock.
Something being there does not give you an automatic right to do whatever you want with it.
I don't have any right to climb on the Australian War Memorial in Kings Park.
Hope you don't visit Stonehenge whilst in England, who owns that?Spoken word.
Nice attempt at casual racism
And what does Uluru mean?Uluru is the name. It’s actually a great irony that right wingers insist on naming things after 19th century public servants.
Are you a Kidd Vicious clone?
The rock is part of nature, and no one owns nature........
They control access, not deny access......Governments control access to nature all the time.
There are certain bits of Kings Park (using Perth as an example) that I cannot access as a member of the public. If the indigenous peoples that have been recognised as the traditional custodians of Uluru and the area around it express a wish for people not to climb it because they view it as sacred, then why do I have to be a dick about it?
Conservative posters on this board are all about that - being dicks just because they want to be dicks. Demanding empathy for their views while not dishing it out in return to those requesting theirs. Hypocrites.
Refer to my earlier post. One romanticises about superstitions around a big rock. The other establishes democracy, law and order, free speech, social security, scientific advances.
A rock is private property?I never thought I'd see one of you go to the lengths of rejecting private property to put a finger in the eye of blackfellas.
Oh well. Welcome aboard comrade.
The traditional owners hold the land title. I have no idea how its determined who the traditional owners are though"Own" is probably a stretch.
They are granted certain controls.
We're heading towards the same destination most of the time, just in different cars. You fail to realise that North supporters hover over all of you omnisciently and are your intellectual masters.Even Snake_Baker doesn't agree with you.
Now that's something......
So GWS is an abbreviation of Nth Melbourne.We're heading towards the same destination most of the time, just in different cars. You fail to realise that North supporters hover over all of you omnisciently and are your intellectual masters.
Even Snake_Baker doesn't agree with you.
Now that's something......
Go Giants.So GWS is an abbreviation of Nth Melbourne.
Never knew that......
How about Mount Kailash then?Why do people keep comparing the land to purposely built man made structures?
Sent from mTalk
Immaculate conception?If your ancestors from GB ****** someone then feel free to make amends. My ancestors didn't **** anyone.