Remove this Banner Ad

Retired Clint Bartram

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Round 4 vs Richmond

Rating:5/10
Kicks: 7
Handballs: 7
Marks: 4
Tackles: 4
Free Kicks: 1 for 1 against
Efficiency: 86%
Contested possessions: 3
Uncontested Possessions: 11
Clearances: 1
Clangers: 1
Assists: 0 (1 goal)
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 1
Opponent: (mostly) Ben Nason 12 kicks 2 handballs
One Percenters: 1
Rebound 50’s: 2

DT Score: 55
SC Score: 52

Pros:
- Worked well defensively not allowing his opponent(s) to kick goals or be damaging forward of centre.
- Disposal efficency, didn't get a lot of it but used it well.
- went forward and kicked a goal

Cons:
- didn;t get as much of the ball as the previous week, still would like to see him run up the ground more.


Does he keep his spot?

Yes, i believe he should. Really plays a good role for us as genuine back pocket, we have a tall backline so Bartram gives us felxibility and reliability down there.
 
Round 5 vs Brisbane

Rating:6.5/10
Kicks: 7
Handballs: 6
Marks: 4
Tackles: 6
Free Kicks: 1 for 0 against
Efficiency: 92%
Contested possessions: 2
Uncontested Possessions: 10
Clearances:
Clangers: 0
Assists: 0
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 1
Opponent: Todd Banfield (8 possessions 0 goals)
One Percenters: 1
Rebound 50’s: 3

DT Score: 70
SC Score: 75

Pros:
- Kept his direct opponent Banfield out of the game.
- Used the ball well when he had it (92% disposal efficiency)
- 6 tackles

Cons:
- Win a bit more of the footy



Does he keep his spot?
Yes, doing a great job as the small backmen.
 
saj_21 said:
Round 5 vs Brisbane

Rating:6.5/10
Kicks: 7
Handballs: 6
Marks: 4
Tackles: 6
Free Kicks: 1 for 0 against
Efficiency: 92%
Contested possessions: 2
Uncontested Possessions: 10
Clearances:
Clangers: 0
Assists: 0
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 1
Opponent: Todd Banfield (8 possessions 0 goals)
One Percenters: 1
Rebound 50’s: 3

DT Score: 70
SC Score: 75

Pros:
- Kept his direct opponent Banfield out of the game.
- Used the ball well when he had it (92% disposal efficiency)
- 6 tackles

Cons:
- Win a bit more of the footy



Does he keep his spot?
Yes, doing a great job as the small backmen.
Click to expand...

Fu.ck me that's high! :D
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

proka123 said:
Fu.ck me that's high! :D
Click to expand...

It has been high all year, you could argue he gets the majority of his possesion in the back half under limited pressure, however. If ur going to get around 15 touches a game in the backline you need to make sure that everyone of them counts. His decison making and skill execution have improved imensly this season by hand and foot.

Has gathered 56 touches in his 4 games thus far at 87.5% efficency.
 
Round 6 vs North Melbourne

Rating:7.5/10
Kicks: 6 and 1 goal
Handballs: 3
Marks: 4
Tackles: 2
Free Kicks: 0 for 1 against
Efficiency: 78 %
Contested possessions: 1
Uncontested Possessions: 9
Clearances:
Clangers: 1
Assists: 0
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 3
Opponent: Brent Harvey 17 touches @ 64% efficiency
One Percenters: 3
Rebound 50’s: 0

DT Score: 47
SC Score:

Pros:
- reduced Harvey's influenece on the game
- 3 insides 50's, got up the ground and moved into our fwd 50.
- kicked a goal, shows good offensive run

Cons:
- tackle count and contested possesions a bit low, but when taggin quite often you have to sit "off the play" and on your opponent, thus not winning as much contested footy.
- still like to see him develop his ball winning abilities more to take the next step. We know he can shut down a player, but would like to see him win the footy also and hurth his direct opponent a la Ling, Clinton Jones.

Does he keep his spot?
Yes, fast becoming our number 1 option as a tagger, can play as the small back pocket as we went into the game wit our back 6 a little to tall.
 
Round 7 vs Bulldogs

Rating:5/10
Kicks: 5
Handballs: 11
Marks: 0
Tackles: 5
Free Kicks: 0 for 0 against
Efficiency: 81%
Contested possessions: 8
Uncontested Possessions: 8
Clearances:
Clangers: 0
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 1
Opponent:
One Percenters: 3
Rebound 50’s: 3

DT Score: 57
SC Score:

Pros:
- won at bit of the ball used it well, had various opponents on the weekend. Didn't seem to be outplayed by his opponent at any given time.
- 8 contested possesions and 5 tackles.

Cons:
- The handball to the umpire wasn't his fault, bloody AFL stuffed up big time.
- Crucial fumble in the last minute of the game allowed Griffen to swoop on the lose ball and kick the winning goal, needed to kick it off the ground.

Does he keep his spot?
Yes, despite a couple of mistakes has been very good as the defensive player for us over the past 6 weeks.
 
Round 8 vs West coast

Rating:5/10
Kicks: 5
Handballs: 8
Marks: 2
Tackles: 0
Free Kicks: 1 for against
Efficiency: 69%
Contested possessions: 5
Uncontested Possessions: 8
Clearances:
Clangers: 0
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s:
Opponent:
One Percenters: 3
Rebound 50’s: 1

DT Score:
SC Score:

Pros:
- No to many pros for Bartram this week, i was unable to go to the game so was hard to tell who he was playing no watching on TV.
- I believe he should of been sent to Priddis or tried on Le Cras.

Cons:
- 0 tackles
- disposal efficieny down
- Like to see him win more of the footy

Does he keep his spot?
Only just, but could be a chance to make way for others, however i believe he plays an important role in the team.
 
Round 9 vs Port Adelaide

Rating:5/10
Kicks: 5
Handballs: 6
Marks: 1
Tackles: 2
Free Kicks: 2 for 0 against
Efficiency: 91%
Contested possessions: 6
Uncontested Possessions: 4
Clearances:
Clangers: 0
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s:
Opponent: Various (hard to tell on tv)
One Percenters: 3
Rebound 50’s:

DT Score: 41
SC Score:

Pros:
- Similar game to last week, like to sim go back to a traditional back pocket win some more footy, tackle hard and run from defence.
- Could of been sent to play on Hitchcock who was dangerous up forward.

Cons:
- More tackles
- More rebound from 50's.
- Like to see him win more of the footy

Does he keep his spot?
Will be important next week against Geelong, ideal match up for Stokes, Byrnes or Johnson.
 
Round 10 vs Geelong

Rating:6/10
Kicks: 4
Handballs: 7
Marks: 4
Tackles: 4
Free Kicks: 0 for 1 against
Efficiency: 73%
Contested possessions: 3
Uncontested Possessions: 8
Clearances:
Clangers: 3
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 2
Opponent: Shannon Byrnes (16 touches 0 goals 1 behind)
One Percenters: 4
Rebound 50’s: 3

DT Score: 51
SC Score:

Pros:
- Held his opponent(s) well all day.
- Rebounds from 50 and ac ouple into 50.

Cons:
- Like to see him win more of the footy

Does he keep his spot?
Yes, like wise important next week against Carltons small forward line. A good match up on Garlett, Betts or Yarran (if fit).
 
Round 11 vs Carlton

Rating:5/10
Kicks:5
Handballs: 5
Marks: 5
Tackles: 5
Free Kicks: 0 for 0 against
Efficiency: 50%
Contested possessions: 3
Uncontested Possessions: 7
Clearances:
Clangers: 2
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 1
Opponent: Garlett 10 touches no goals
One Percenters: 0
Rebound 50’s: 1

DT Score: 51
SC Score:

Pros:
- Kept his opponent quiet again
- 5 tackles

Cons:
- Low possesion count
- Low disposal efficiency grnated it was wet conditions for a half

Does he keep his spot?
Yes again did his job keeping dangerous small forward quiet.
 
Round 12 vs Collingwood

Rating:8/10
Kicks:11
Handballs: 7
Marks: 6
Tackles: 3
Free Kicks: 2 for 0 against
Efficiency: 78%
Contested possessions: 7
Uncontested Possessions: 11
Clearances:
Clangers: 1
Assists: 0
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 0
Opponent: Leon Davis 11 touches 1 goal
One Percenters: 2
Rebound 50’s: 3

DT Score: 79
SC Score:

Pros:
- Kept Davis very queit again
- Won more of the footy

Cons:
- low tackle and 1% count.

Does he keep his spot?
Yes, again did his job keeping dangerous small forward quiet. Has only conceeded 5 goals in 11 games.
 
Round 13 vs Adelaide
Rating:3/10
Kicks:8
Handballs:6
Marks:2
Tackles: 3
Free Kicks: 3 for 0 against
Efficiency: 79%
Contested possessions: 5
Uncontested Possessions: 9
Clearances:
Clangers: 1
Assists: 0
TOG:
Inside 50’s: 0
Opponent:
One Percenters: 3
Rebound 50’s: 2

DT Score: 57
SC Score:

Pros:
- Still wont a bit of the ball, good run down chase on Griffin showed some intensity others lacked/

Cons:
- First time this year had his colours lowered and had a few goal kicked on him.

Does he keep his spot?
Yes, had an off day but has been good all year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Round 14 vs St. Kilda
Rating:4/10
Kicks:8
Handballs:4
Marks:2
Tackles: 2
Free Kicks: 0 for 0 against
Efficiency: 67%
Contested possessions: 1
Uncontested Possessions: 11
Clearances:
Clangers: 1
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s:
Opponent:
One Percenters: 1
Rebound 50’s: 1

DT Score:
SC Score:

Pros:
-

Cons:
-
Does he keep his spot?
 
Round 14 vs Essendon
Rating:7/10
Kicks:5
Handballs:4
Marks:3
Tackles: 2
Free Kicks: 0 for 0 against
Efficiency: 89%
Contested possessions: 1
Uncontested Possessions: 8
Clearances:
Clangers: 1
Assists:
TOG:
Inside 50’s:
Opponent: Davey, kicked his only goal in the last 2 minutes of the game.
One Percenters: 2
Rebound 50’s: 1

DT Score: 40
SC Score:

Pros:
-

Cons:
-
Does he keep his spot? Yes, good much up on Ballantyne next week.
 
melbournefc.com.au - We can match it with the best: Bartram (Matt Burgan) July 19 2010


ON THE BACK of a heartbreaking 11-point loss to Fremantle at Subiaco Oval on Sunday, defender Clint Bartram says Melbourne can match it with the best in the business when it is up and going.

After Melbourne trailed by 44 points in the second quarter - yet got back to within a point in the third and final terms - Bartram said it showed Melbourne could match it with the AFL’s top teams, when on its game.

“In the third quarter, it just showed that when we pressure the opposition we can be one of the best teams in the competition, but on the other side we only played one quarter of footy, again,” he told melbournefc.com.au.

“It’s obviously something we’ve got to address. On the road it’s always going to be hard to come back and peg a good side, so it’s something we’ve got to work on.

ClintBartramRd16L.jpg

source: melbournefc.com.au
Click to expand...
 
After looking like his career was on the scrap heap at the start of the year he turned it all around by doing a real solid job week in week out on the oppositions small forwards. I would like to see him get run with roles in the midfield like he did in his debut year. His disposal is still too untidy. 6\10
 
Bartram

Question - should Bartram be an automatic selection every week?

We all love his hardness and determination, and he really did a pretty good job on Cotchin yesterday, but really, he can't kick to save himself and his skill errors are a dagger to my heart every time they invariably occur.

I'm torn on this one cos I love everything Bartram does without the ball
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Tempy Tiger said:
It was an interesting match-up yesterday, didn't Bartram's missus leave him for Cotchin last year?!
Click to expand...

So the rumour goes... Didn't think about that one during the game! Juicy.

Agree with OP, Bartram's disposal is inadequate at best. In my harsh opinion he won't be getting a game when Tapscott and Strauss are pushing for spots next year... Along with Blease and Bennell.
 
Re: Bartram

Whilst I wanted Bartram dead after his three misses against WC it cannot be denied that he is our best stopper at the moment. He held Kerr to a very modest game and would have been BOG had he slotted those three easy shots, and yesterday he held Cotchin pretty well too.

Like it or not- we're stuck with him until we can find another stopper who isn't a spud offensively. Bail may be that man but I dont like the idea of him being in such a negative role...
 
Re: Bartram

Played well yesterday on Cotchin. Definititely needs to work on his kicking but I didn't notice it too much yesterday. In an ideal world our better kicks would work harder to get the ball off him so he doesn't have to kick as much and can concentrate on tagging.
 
Re: Bartram

melbournemartin said:
Played well yesterday on Cotchin. Definititely needs to work on his kicking but I didn't notice it too much yesterday. In an ideal world our better kicks would work harder to get the ball off him so he doesn't have to kick as much and can concentrate on tagging.
Click to expand...

Agree with this.

I can forgive some of the sloppier kicks as long as it doesn't mean he undoes all his hard work. But I also don't want to start rewarding poor disposal. With the skinnier guys you stick them in the gym over summer, what do you do with guys with poor disposal? Stick them in a room full of footys?
 
Re: Bartram

Demon 86 said:
Like it or not- we're stuck with him until we can find another stopper who isn't a spud offensively. Bail may be that man but I dont like the idea of him being in such a negative role...
Click to expand...
This is the crux of it.

d33my said:
I can forgive some of the sloppier kicks as long as it doesn't mean he undoes all his hard work. But I also don't want to start rewarding poor disposal. With the skinnier guys you stick them in the gym over summer, what do you do with guys with poor disposal? Stick them in a room full of footys?
Click to expand...
Kind of glad I haven't seen a Dees version of the Coke Zero kicking adds.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Retired Clint Bartram

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top