Club Communications

[Scodog10]

As always, whatever floats your boat.
I'm a firm believer people can do as they wish.
Re membership, totally up to each person to decide for themselves the benefit or otherwise.

If enough people walk the plank as you have, maybe somebody will notice.
If not many, nothing will come of it.

Be interesting to see the numbers of members

Those numbers are massaged its the revenue and expenses that tell the real tale.

 

[Saintly Viewed]

Those numbers are massaged its the revenue and expenses that tell the real tale.

Massaged memberships you say?
Tell me it ain't so.

Lol, membership numbers are as exacting as the AFL being totally impartial with GWS

 

[sr36]

They really are tokenistic embarrassing questions.

 

[The Prince 29]

Filled it in. I doubt they'll get anything worthwhile out of it, but you never know.

Made a few suggestions:
Better social club facilities (strong arm the MCC as major tenant, outside bar and do up the , better set up at the glasshouse (more casual bar/pub than formal dining) and cheaper memberships (just pours into the afl equalization fund, run it like a mutual following year reduce premiums...Membership numbers increase, even more leverage)
i use to love going to Vic Park Social Club stand as a member, and in the bar after the game with my old man .he knew the Fullback of the Century (not SOS) and use to get his GF tickets through him).

 

[Scodog10]

Made a few suggestions:
Better social club facilities (strong arm the MCC as major tenant, outside bar and do up the , better set up at the glasshouse (more casual bar/pub than formal dining) and cheaper memberships (just pours into the afl equalization fund, run it like a mutual following year reduce premiums...Membership numbers increase, even more leverage)
i use to love going to Vic Park Social Club stand as a member, and in the bar after the game with my old man .he knew the Fullback of the Century (not SOS) and use to get his GF tickets through him).

Good stuff! The club invested an extra $4 million in functions and gaming in 2016 yet we saw little of it in the form of what you mentioned above.

Unfortunately its highly likely that the feedback you supplied will be ignored because it didn't relate to the clubs media department, however keep it going I say because people power should never be underestimated.

 

[Saintly Viewed]

i use to love going to Vic Park Social Club stand as a member, and in the bar after the game with my old man .he knew the Fullback of the Century (not SOS) and use to get his GF tickets through him).

likes x 100 for that line

 

[The Dawes]

They really are tokenistic embarrassing questions.

the questions I hated the most was, what words come to mind regarding Collingwood Media, please use at least five words.

how about you stick five words up your clacker?

 

[Mkcaptain]

Good stuff! The club invested an extra $4 million in functions and gaming in 2016 yet we saw little of it in the form of what you mentioned above.

Unfortunately its highly likely that the feedback you supplied will be ignored because it didn't relate to the clubs media department, however keep it going I say because people power should never be underestimated.

The Media team seem like genuinely solid people who get along with the fan base well. I'm sure that feedback that falls outside the banner of Collingwood Media would be directed upward rather than ignored.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Well they are taking their sweet time about it considering its been about two years.
But they know I'm coming back as soon as the convicted players are no longer listed.
Shouldn't be much longer now.

So let me get this straight, you won't financially support the club while two players that were convicted for taking a banned substance are on the list, but you're happy to start contributing financially again once they're gone, even though it is reputed another six blokes were on the same substance, and were just fortunate not to be tested?


Righttttt

 

[Black_White]

So let me get this straight, you won't financially support the club while two players that were convicted for taking a banned substance are on the list, but you're happy to start contributing financially again once they're gone, even though it is reputed another six blokes were on the same substance, and were just fortunate not to be tested?


Righttttt

Spot on.
Reputed isn't the same as convicted. Don't understand why people continue to try and divert from the facts.
My stand is taken on moral grounds. I want clean competition and I'm devestated that my club appears to not want the same thing.
So, as small as it is, I've taken a stand.

 

[ColinWood]

Filled it in. I doubt they'll get anything worthwhile out of it, but you never know.

Me too

 

[Black_White]

If you didn't get the email, yet want to have your say;
http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/news/2016-12-14/communications-survey-complete-and-win