Club condemns Adelaide Crows player for allegedly sharing an image of a woman without permission

[BunjiMC]

I wasn't able to read the article, so this is a dead story?

Certainly sounds that way.

 

[GameofSloanes]

If it's a current best 22 player we might see a late change tomorrow?

 

[Cromulant]

I wasn't able to read the article, so this is a dead story?

Yes

 

[Cromulant]

If it's a current best 22 player we might see a late change tomorrow?

No

It was dealt with months ago

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

No

It was dealt with months ago

More whether we have refused to pkay one of our players because of this incident & held them back in the sanfl?

 

[relapse]

The key to working out who it is will be the link to a delisted player, clearly the two players are really close friends.

Just need to go back through the players we recently delisted and work out who they're close friends with.

 

[1990crow]

If it's a current best 22 player we might see a late change tomorrow?

Guess we can rule out Tex then

 

[1970crow]

It’s hard to form a view without access to the image. If anyone has it, PM me so I can engage appropriately.

Seriously though, I find this whole issue somewhat hard to comprehend. I get that abusing that trust is distasteful, but unless the images were taken without authority, surely the authoriser shares culpability. We have enough laws, why do we have to protect people from their own conscious and agreed actions? If you don’t want nude photos of yourself being circulated, don’t authorise them being taken in the first place.

How infuriatingly dumb are people these days?

 

[1990crow]

New current number 9 and former number 25??

 

[pjcrows]

It’s hard to form a view without access to the image. If anyone has it, PM me so I can engage appropriately.

Seriously though, I find this whole issue somewhat hard to comprehend. I get that abusing that trust is distasteful, but unless the images were taken without authority, surely the authoriser shares culpability. We have enough laws, why do we have to protect people from their own conscious and agreed actions? If you don’t want nude photos of yourself being circulated, don’t authorise them being taken in the first place.

How infuriatingly dumb are people these days?

You don't know whether the photo of the woman was authorised or taken with her permission, though.

I don't know if the law is different for authorised or unauthorised photos. I suspect it's not.

 

[relapse]

New current number 9 and former number 25??

WOW

You could be on the money there, didn't they go halves and buy hobby farm or something? There's definitely a close link between them

 

[Syd Crow]

I thought Murph was the only one at the club with photos?

That would be photos of Nicks, Roo, Silvers and Olsen in a hot tub!

 

[1970crow]

You don't know whether the photo of the woman was authorised or taken with her permission, though.

I don't know if the law is different for authorised or unauthorised photos. I suspect it's not.

I don’t think the law distinguishes. I’m 100% on board with the blokes being total knobs, but I don’t understand why society spends $ protecting idiots from themselves by prosecuting those knobs. If you willingly authorised the images being taken then tough shit.

 

[Cromulant]

You don't know whether the photo of the woman was authorised or taken with her permission, though.

I don't know if the law is different for authorised or unauthorised photos. I suspect it's not.

I think it's "relatively" safe to assume she was ok with it being taken.... but not shared

 

[BRL121]

What is the actual law? If a person consents to a sexual type image being taken, is it illegal to show others? Is there a context requirement or is it black and white?

If it's in black and white, it's art. If it's in colour, there's a problem.

 

[cleanhands]

Certainly sounds that way.

View attachment 2323362View attachment 2323363View attachment 2323364

Victim appropriate support ……..$$$

 

[1990crow]

WOW

You could be on the money there, didn't they go halves and buy hobby farm or something? There's definitely a close link between them

Conspiracy theory injury?

 

[Samcro24]

It’s hard to form a view without access to the image. If anyone has it, PM me so I can engage appropriately.

Seriously though, I find this whole issue somewhat hard to comprehend. I get that abusing that trust is distasteful, but unless the images were taken without authority, surely the authoriser shares culpability. We have enough laws, why do we have to protect people from their own conscious and agreed actions? If you don’t want nude photos of yourself being circulated, don’t authorise them being taken in the first place.

How infuriatingly dumb are people these days?

Yep

When I take and send a dick pick, I do so knowing the recipient may at any point in time forward it on to someone else.

In fact I expect it to happen.

 

[BunjiMC]

Didn't take long for this thread to go to victim blaming....heck

 

[GrommoT]

Yep

When I take and send a dick pick, I do so knowing the recipient may at any point in time forward it on to someone else.

In fact I expect it to happen.

 

[BRL121]

Didn't take long for this thread to go to victim blaming....heck

I don't see the word "victim" as applying to anyone in this.

 

[FR0GGY]

WOW

You could be on the money there, didn't they go halves and buy hobby farm or something? There's definitely a close link between them

Surely Ned wouldn’t rat out a mate and business partner.

 

[Cleric]

Yeah, nah, I'm guessing said lady might not be complaining if it was just a 'family snap'.

The way I look at it, if it was a nude photo the media would be using words more than just a photo.

 

[cmndstab]

It’s hard to form a view without access to the image. If anyone has it, PM me so I can engage appropriately.

Seriously though, I find this whole issue somewhat hard to comprehend. I get that abusing that trust is distasteful, but unless the images were taken without authority, surely the authoriser shares culpability. We have enough laws, why do we have to protect people from their own conscious and agreed actions? If you don’t want nude photos of yourself being circulated, don’t authorise them being taken in the first place.

How infuriatingly dumb are people these days?

Mate... I think it's pretty reasonable to expect that people won't share your nude/explicit images around with other people without your consent. Agreeing to send raunchy selfies to someone doesn't authorise them to circulate those images, and there are laws about that very thing for a reason.

In any event, sounds like it's a dead story at this point. Hopefully the players learn their lesson. In this case it sounds like the woman involved just wants the whole thing to go away, but in another case the victim would be well within their rights to drag the player and the club through the mud.

 

[BRL121]

Mate... I think it's pretty reasonable to expect that people won't share your nude/explicit images around with other people without your consent. Agreeing to send raunchy selfies to someone doesn't authorise them to circulate those images, and there are laws about that very thing for a reason.

In any event, sounds like it's a dead story at this point. Hopefully the players learn their lesson. In this case it sounds like the woman involved just wants the whole thing to go away, but in another case the victim would be well within their rights to drag the player and the club through the mud.

They would actually be dragging themselves through the mud, though.