MVP Coaches Votes 2020

[Aphrodite]

ROUND 1


CARLTON v RICHMOND

9 Dion Prestia (RICH)
5 Jack Martin (CARL)
5 Patrick Cripps (CARL)
4 Daniel Rioli (RICH)
4 Dustin Martin (RICH)
3 Jacob Weitering (CARL)

 

[Aphrodite]

ROUND 2


CARLTON v MELBOURNE

10 Christian Petracca (MELB)
8 Max Gawn (MELB)
6 Jacob Weitering (CARL)
3 Clayton Oliver (MELB)
2 Sam Docherty (CARL)
1 Christian Salem (MELB)

 

[Aphrodite]

ROUND 3


CARLTON v GEELONG


9 Levi Casboult (CARL)
7 Marc Pittonet (CARL)
5 Patrick Cripps (CARL)
4 Jacob Weitering (CARL)
3 Eddie Betts (CARL)
1 Gary Rohan (GEEL)
1 Sam Docherty (CARL)

 

[Robbo's my hero]

What would the coaches know? I love the top two getting recognition.

 

[heatleystandend]

The only way these votes are possible if Cripps got 5 votes from one coach and zero from the other. Hard to believe anyone watching that game didn't have Cripps in the best 5 on the ground.

 

[gab213]

The only way these votes are possible if Cripps got 5 votes from one coach and zero from the other. Hard to believe anyone watching that game didn't have Cripps in the best 5 on the ground.

I'm not all that surprised, it's a good sign, we had a lot of players who did well on Saturday Night. Even if you look at our own POTY on this board, 49 people have voted, 10 don't have Cripps in their votes.

 

[Robbo's my hero]

The only way these votes are possible if Cripps got 5 votes from one coach and zero from the other. Hard to believe anyone watching that game didn't have Cripps in the best 5 on the ground.

That’s one configuration but he could have received 3 and 2 or 4 and 1.

 

[GeoCoulthard]

On my analysis, Cripps either got 5 votes from one coach and zero from the other or Weitering got 4 from one coach and zero from the other. I don't think other combinations are possible. Either combination means that one coach didn't rate Cripps and/or Weitering's game.

 

[HARKER]

The only way these votes are possible if Cripps got 5 votes from one coach and zero from the other. Hard to believe anyone watching that game didn't have Cripps in the best 5 on the ground.

NO -

Levi - 5 & 4 - No other way
Pitt - 2 & 5
Cripps - 3 & 2
Weit - 4 & 0
Betts - 0 & 3 - No other way
Rohan - 1 & 0 - Obvious
Doc - 0 & 1 - Obvious

This seems most likely to me.

 

[Aphrodite]

ROUND 4


CARLTON V ESSENDON


8 David Cuningham (CARL)
8 Sam Docherty (CARL)
8 Levi Casboult (CARL)
4 Marc Pittonet (CARL)
1 Jordan Ridley (ESS)
1 Mitch McGovern (CARL)

 

[HARKER]

McGovern one vote?
Would have ECurnow and Murphy ahead.
Must have been a Teague 'Vote of Faith'

First four are hard to argue with, but who got the 4 & 4

 

[Jeremias]

Sitting on a 2-2 record (very nearly 3-1) and Cripps is barely in our top 5 for coaches votes.

Growth.

 

[Arr0w]

ROUND 4


CARLTON V ESSENDON


8 David Cuningham (CARL)
8 Sam Docherty (CARL)
8 Levi Casboult (CARL)
4 Marc Pittonet (CARL)
1 Jordan Ridley (ESS)
1 Mitch McGovern (CARL)

Surprised with Gov, but good on him

Would have had Weitering or Gibbons

 

[ferrisb]

ROUND 4


CARLTON V ESSENDON


8 David Cuningham (CARL)
8 Sam Docherty (CARL)
8 Levi Casboult (CARL)
4 Marc Pittonet (CARL)
1 Jordan Ridley (ESS)
1 Mitch McGovern (CARL)

Can't be right - Weitering not in the votes...

 

[Aphrodite]

AFLCA votes: Triple treat at the top

Three Carlton players couldn't be split in the AFLCA votes.

www.carltonfc.com.au

 

[Robbo's my hero]

Docherty, Casboult and Cuningham difficult to split.

 

[Aphrodite]

ROUND 5


CARLTON v ST KILDA

10 Jack Steele (STK)
7 Rowan Marshall (STK)
4 Jack Billings (STK)
4 Nick Coffield (STK)
2 Jack Martin (CARL)
2 Liam Jones (CARL)
1 Callum Wilkie (STK)

 

[1981]

Should we have a total board for Carlton players updated each week??

Here, after 5 games:

Casboult 17
Weitering 13
Docherty 11
Pittonet 11
Cripps 10
Cuningham 8
Martin 7
Betts 3
Jones 2
McGovern 1

 

[Jeremias]

ROUND 6

CARLTON VS WESTERN BULLDOGS

8 Jack Martin (CARL)
5 Ed Curnow (CARL)
5 Jack Macrae (WB)
4 Eddie Betts (CARL)
3 Alex Keath (WB)
2 Harrison McKay (CARL)
2 Michael Gibbons (CARL)
1 Bailey Smith (WB)

Would love to see who voted for who, because someone is having a laugh.

 

[Stefchook]

Beveridge almost never gives votes to opposition players. It's really fairly ridiculous.

 

[new_blue]

Beveridge almost never gives votes to opposition players. It's really fairly ridiculous.

Agreed. It seems he considered WB to have 3 of the best 5 players, with Keith and Macrae being 2 of the top 3 players on the ground.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[M_I_G]

Beveridge almost never gives votes to opposition players. It's really fairly ridiculous.

His votes are always atrocious
Always have a laugh checking them out

 

[HARKER]

ROUND 6

CARLTON VS WESTERN BULLDOGS

8 Jack Martin (CARL)
5 Ed Curnow (CARL)
5 Jack Macrae (WB)
4 Eddie Betts (CARL)
3 Alex Keath (WB)
2 Harrison McKay (CARL)
2 Michael Gibbons (CARL)
1 Bailey Smith (WB)

Would love to see who voted for who, because someone is having a laugh.

Martin - 4 & 4
Curnow - 5 & 0 - Teague
Macrae - 5 & 0 - Beverdige
Betts - 3 & 1...................This one decides how the rest went.
Keath - 3 & 0..................No other way
McKay - 2 & 0.................No other way
Gibbons - 2 & 0...............No other way
Smith - 1 & 0..................No other way

I feel it went this way.

 

[new_blue]

Martin - 4 & 4
Curnow - 5 & 0 - Teague
Macrae - 5 & 0 - Beverdige
Betts - 3 & 1...................This one decides how the rest went.
Keath - 3 & 0..................No other way
McKay - 2 & 0.................No other way
Gibbons - 2 & 0...............No other way
Smith - 1 & 0..................No other way

I feel it went this way.

I felt it may have gone like:

Teague
1. Macrae
2. Gibbo
3. Martin
4. Betts
5. Curnow

Beveridge
1. Smith
2. Harry
3. Keith
4. Macrae
5. Martin

 

[HARKER]

I felt it may have gone like:

Teague
1. Macrae
2. Gibbo
3. Martin
4. Betts
5. Curnow

Beveridge
1. Smith
2. Harry
3. Keith
4. Macrae
5. Martin

There are possibilities, but hard to not have seen the value of Betts. 4 goals alone..........but then again.........who knows?
I can see why Teague may have favoured ECurnow though.

Best player shows up as Martin though and I wouldn't argue with that.