Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Shultzy is simply the gift that keeps on giving - horrible trade.Don't disagree but all I'll say is you better not lose to Richmond this week! That would be way worse than a Giants loss.
I actually agree they have cooked this 'challenge for a flag' thing, the Houston trade is fine, it's the Schultz one. I don't get why you trade Ginnavan for a worse version at double the price and that's not even considering the draft capital on top
Shultzy is simply the gift that keeps on giving - horrible trade.
Ginnavan was the archetypal Collingwood forward - annoyed the shite out of us all, but kicked goals & got them going.
Houston is quality - but they are so poor out of the middle - he may end up defending a lot, rather than pushing forward.
I've been reliably informed that he won the coaches award in 2024. He is rated very highly from the inner sanctum at collingwood.I just wonder whether the plan is Houston in the middle not in defence, maybe that's an option, but boy the Shultz one is a shocker. I could get it if they were flipping Ginna for Charlie Cameron or someone, but what honestly was the point...surely its not because the bloke went to the races before a GF (which made not difference)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I've been reliably informed that he won the coaches award in 2024. He is rated very highly from the inner sanctum at collingwood.
you would think the plan would be for Houston to play as a HHB - running & distributing off HB and through the middle into F50.I just wonder whether the plan is Houston in the middle not in defence, maybe that's an option, but boy the Shultz one is a shocker. I could get it if they were flipping Ginna for Charlie Cameron or someone, but what honestly was the point...surely its not because the bloke went to the races before a GF (which made not difference)
You're right, it is ridiculous to suggest they will bottom out like Richmond.They'll beat us by 10 goals next week and it will be back to business. There's no doubt they won't win the flag but to suggest they're going to bottom out like Richmond is ridiculous.
It's an award you win for defensive pressure, or what i call, being beaten by your opponent so you have to try and chase said opponent out of your own forward lineMust make a mean Gatorade or something because it can't be for his goalkicking ability
It's an award you win for defensive pressure, or what i call, being beaten by your opponent so you have to try and chase said opponent out of your own forward line
you would think the plan would be for Houston to play as a HHB - running & distributing off HB and through the middle into F50.
The hope is to release Nick Daicos into the middle.
Their problem against rebounding sides is C’wood simply don’t run both ways - so he’ll be exposed coming back the other way.
It will force Houston back, to be accountable. Teams will be looking for Houston’s player on the rebound.
Not sure who will play HB if he doesn’t - Josh Daicos not looking great back there.
Owies was winning no defensive pressure awardArrh the Owies award was a master of it
Owies was winning no defensive pressure award
Why would you make such a ridiculous statement when they're actually continually topping up on senior players... It's not a recipe for success because they're probably not good enough but it certainly isn't a recipe for a Richmond like bottom out.You're right, it is ridiculous to suggest they will bottom out like Richmond.
Collingwood will bottom out far worse and for much longer.
I'm looking forward to seeing SPP run straight through Houston.you would think the plan would be for Houston to play as a HHB - running & distributing off HB and through the middle into F50.
The hope is to release Nick Daicos into the middle.
Their problem against rebounding sides is C’wood simply don’t run both ways - so he’ll be exposed coming back the other way.
It will force Houston back, to be accountable. Teams will be looking for Houston’s player on the rebound.
Not sure who will play HB if he doesn’t - Josh Daicos not looking great back there.
Yep. We all love the ball in our team’s hands.We wouldn’t have to chase in the first place if we were able to connect on the outside.
But regardless when I said our issue was on the spread, I meant both offensively and defensively.
Richmond are currently bottoming out due to continually topping up with senior players and neglecting the draft.Why would you make such a ridiculous statement when they're actually continually topping up on senior players... It's not a recipe for success because they're probably not good enough but it certainly isn't a recipe for a Richmond like bottom out.
Exactly. I haven't really changed my view on Collingwood because of one game - I still have them finishing top 5 in 2025. One game is not enough to change pre-season predictions imo. Need to see at least a month of footy before considering reassessing. And even though the Giants had significant outs they still put out a very good team and I rate them very highly. So wasn't a massive surprise I don't think to see them play that well.Brisbane were supposedly shot after a month last year, but I think you need to give us at least a month to judge this early whether we are good enough for finals. One round results can be strange in isolation.
We don’t have the excuse of a shorter preseason this year, but we did control the game for large spells yesterday in hindsight.
We see this happen at Marvel and other small grounds, you can have the football for the whole of the third quarter and because of the small dimensions it’s very easy for the team on the back foot to not concede with numbers back. So many goals these days come from 666 resets and back half launched counter attacks.
Our forwards all had shockers. Our best midfielder was well held and had a bizarre cramping issue. That won’t be the norm. But if we **** up this fortnight it will be too high a hill to climb again like last year.
In fairness to Brisbane, they had an extraordinary amount of ACL injuries to first 22 players on their list at the time.Brisbane were supposedly shot after a month last year, but I think you need to give us at least a month to judge this early whether we are good enough for finals. One round results can be strange in isolation.
Yeah but the Lions had drafted well and the injuries gave further opportunities to Morris, Lohman, Fletcher etc which they grabbed with open arms.In fairness to Brisbane, they had an extraordinary amount of ACL injuries to first 22 players on their list at the time.
I’m not sure they will.You're right, it is ridiculous to suggest they will bottom out like Richmond.
Collingwood will bottom out far worse and for much longer.
I don't think the impending thrashing of us will tell you much if anythingThink everyone needs to calm down a fraction
1. It's round 0 (1) Brisbane were 0/5 or something last year, it's a poor game thats all it is.
2. Under every metric until 3/4 Collingwood should have been ahead contested ball, possessions everything, so the margin blew out but they weren't as bad as the margin stated.
3. The Giants showed why they are the premiership favourites or at least very close to it, they had a bit more class when it counted, whether it be Callahan, Toby at times and have the best defender in the game by a country mile in Taylor marking everything.
4. Lets see how they go against Port this week.
The Soviet Union had far more runs on the boardThis must have been what it was like in the early days of the Soviet Unions collapse.