Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. Buckley
2. Pendlebury
3. Daicos
4. Swan
5. Brown
6. T. Shaw
7. Millaine
8. McGuane
9. Sidebottom
10. Grundy
11. Clement
12. Licuria
13. Burns
14. T. Cloke
15. A. Rocca
16. S. Rocca
17. Didak
18. Crosisca
19. H. Shaw
20. Maxwell
The AFL will assume unprecedented control over its clubs as part of the revolutionary new rescue package put forward on Thursday night to the 18 club bosses.
In a receivership model that will essentially turn league chief Gillon McLachlan and the AFL Commission into the competition's banker, clubs unable to meet cash-flow demands will now borrow funds previously deemed extra dividends from head office.
And to underline the increasing differences between the ''haves'' and the ''have nots'', the wealthier clubs such as West Coast, Richmond and Collingwood - disenchanted at having to follow receivership rules - have achieved a special clause in the new agreement. This will exempt them from having to regularly open their books to head office.
Only four clubs - West Coast, Richmond, Hawthorn and Collingwood - could potentially survive a football-free season without borrowing from the AFL.
...Should the football season commence by early August the prevailing view is that Essendon, the Western Bulldogs - which recently sold off a large parcel of gaming machines - and potentially Adelaide retain sufficient cash flow to survive without borrowing from the AFL's $600 million pool.
A lot of clubs have been endlessly propped up through unequal AFL funding in the name of equality.
Agree but they will have to pay back the loans and face higher scrutiny. No doubt the more able clubs would be better off if they were not held back by the competition parameters.A lot of clubs have been endlessly propped up through unequal AFL funding in the name of equality.
This unprecedented situation certainly makes the sustainability of such a funding model and long term viability of some clubs questionable.
Would more clubs have had greater financial reserves and ability to stand on their own feet in a less competitive market with fewer teams fighting for the same dollar?
It also highlights just how far Carlton have fallen and how much the asada matter damaged Essendon financially.
Nice opening lie in the article, didn’t think it was possible for someone to forget the Ball rigmarole as the saints kept shifting the goal posts. Brown was never going to happen, but Goldsack was rumoured and likewise Wellingham in a three way with NM. Weaken Collingwood and strengthen the saints (Goldsack or pick 25) and the season might well look different. In their desire not to strengthen us the saints only hurt themselves.Apparently we only won because we stole their intellectual property when we got Luke Ball and also Max Hudghton as a coach.
ROSS Lyon has revealed deep regret for trading Luke Ball from St Kilda to Collingwood at the end of 2009.
Nice opening lie in the article, didn’t think it was possible for someone to forget the Ball rigmarole as the saints kept shifting the goal posts. Brown was never going to happen, but Goldsack was rumoured and likewise Wellingham in a three way with NM. Weaken Collingwood and strengthen the saints (Goldsack or pick 25) and the season might well look different. In their desire not to strengthen us the saints only hurt themselves.
Agree but they will have to pay back the loans and face higher scrutiny. No doubt the more able clubs would be better off if they were not held back by the competition parameters.