Traded Collingwood trade #27 to Richmond for #38, #40 and F3
- Thread starter Taylor
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Banned
- #51
Richmond offered essentially four first rounders for pick 1. Iirc. (x3 + ccj)
So bidding on pick2 sounds possible I'd they rate calla
- Banned
- #52
What did Collingwood get for giving away pick2?
North should bid at one. It looks dumb to not
- Jul 6, 2017
- 28,514
- 37,972
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
its more if Richmond really wanted Callaghan and there was a strong feeling that GWS are taking Mac Andrew with pick 2 and GC taking Gibcus to bookend with B King as top end key position players. Callaghan may still be on the board at the crows pick. FWIW, there has been talk GWS are really looking hard at Mac Andrew - he could be anything but will be a bit of a slow burn due to his body frame being so light. It would make absolute sense for GC to be looking at the best key defender in the draft as they have drafted quite a few mids but lack that extra high end key position player to work with Collins in Defence. But do the clubs see it like that, god only knows
Prochard123
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2014
- 7,147
- 5,773
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Not much. we got a couple of guys we really rate late.
but our 3 best draftees - Henry, Macrae, McInnis were recruited before hand. We didn’t need to trade our future first.
- Banned
- #55
This might be a good result for the tigers if they keep #7
Leaves a better rated next tier mid on the table
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
They won't though for a number of reasons and the main one being marketing and for a smaller club it's important.
- Banned
- #57
I looked it up cause I didn't understand your answer.
GWS trade pick
#24,
#30
and 2021 R4
to Collingwood for 2021 R1
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...-r4-to-collingwood-for-2021-r1.1252475/page-2
holy s**t
Last edited:
- Banned
- #58
Ah yes hard to market non pick ones like Judd dusty and franklin.
For north to not bid would be very stupid and the pies will likely flog them in a big future final as karma
- Jul 6, 2017
- 28,514
- 37,972
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Yes - it will come down to how much they want a player that they think gone at pick 7 v going for another player and then retaining a pick between 15-20. The good news is we have another 4 weeks + to wait to find out
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Still think you shouldn't try and play funny buggers at the pointy end, take the best available talent.
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
I would bid on Daicos but reality is North won't as they are set on Horne, it's fine GWS will bid at 2 anyway. Either way Pies are paying a premium.
- Banned
- #62
They will get Horne anyway.
What's the odds Collingwood don't match?
I know it won't happen but it highlights north are dills imho.
Not sure how wise it is, to help a fellow rebuilding team. Directly helping a future (potential) rival
Last edited:
- Jul 6, 2017
- 28,514
- 37,972
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Agree. What will be a factor would be in any thought of a trade down should one present is a guy like Goater whom I suspect the crows have a real interest in - he may very well still be there at 7 so could you trade down - still get the guy you rate the best available after JHF and garner the extra teens pick maybe?
I think GWS will bid on Darcy rather than Daicos. They would rather a young ruckman before another midfielder.
- Banned
- #66
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
They will bid on both.
- Jul 6, 2017
- 28,514
- 37,972
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
There is a less than zero chance they won't match because if they don't they will be waiting till pick 30 something which will be their first live pick. It is a risk free bid for north as Collingwood are not passing up a guy rated either 1 or 2 in the draft pool for a series of junk picks
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Plenty to play out I just can't see GWS trading down. They still have a good list. Take the best player available at 2. Then 13 they may split, actually think that your two picks in the 20's might be on the cards there.
- Banned
- #71
13 for 27, 28 and a future 5th
Prochard123
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2014
- 7,147
- 5,773
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Yeah we’ve been through this at least 6000 times lol
starting to wonder if people genuinely didn’t realise how bad it was or just want to keep reminding us
Prochard123
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2014
- 7,147
- 5,773
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Not happening, not close either
Prochard123
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jul 28, 2014
- 7,147
- 5,773
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
It doesn’t tho. That’s just wishful thinking trying to justify this trade.
Let’s just take WBD example, 2 of the very best rebounding defenders in the comp in Dale and Daniel were taken with picks in the 40s.
You are not getting elite KPF late, but key defenders or players of any other role are often able to be found in that 30-40 range
Similar threads
