List Mgmt. Collingwood Trade Talk 2015

What Trade Happens 1st


  • Total voters
    338
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

TW Sherrin

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Posts
11,102
Likes
10,769
Location
?
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
49ers
Because it looks as if GWS want pick 28 from Carlton. Carlton will get pick 28 from Adelaide in the Menzel deal (trade 1). Pick 28 (and pick 20/21) will go from Carlton to GWS as a part of the four player deal (trade 2). GWS will then have pick 20/21, pick 27 and pick 28 in this years draft, presumably they don't need all of them. As such, pick 28 will likely come to Collingwood as a part of the Treloar deal (trade 3). Due to Brisbane having academy kids they want to pick up this year, they're likely to want two second rounders this year to help pay for them (which might be why we haven't done a deal for pick 26 and St.Kilda's 2016 second rounder). Finally, we might give up pick 26 and pick 28 for Aish (trade 4). Brisbane might want to pick up Bastinac from North with pick 26 or pick 28 (trade 5).

However, why can't GWS just give us pick 27 now and be done with it? Because they then don't have the insurance of holding both pick 27 and pick 28. So understandably they want the Carlton deal to go through first (although they might be angling to get both pick 20 and pick 21 from Carlton). At the other end, what if North won't take pick 26 or pick 28 for Bastinac? Will Brisbane take pick 26 and pick 28 for Aish without assurance that Bastinac is coming for one of those picks? What if North want a pick in the low 20's for Bastinac? Will GWS give up pick 20/21 for Treloar? Would Brisbane give up pick 20/21 for Bastinac instead of pick 26?

Of course, I'm just speculating here (and likely to be wrong), but it's a very complicated process with other deals constantly hinging on other deals. Just because Hine isn't giving us hourly updates doesn't mean he isn't working his backside off to get deals done.



There's this really frustrating need for instant gratification throughout this thread. Dominoes clearly need to fall before we can land our players. We're the ones getting the big fish here and as such we'll get our players last. GWS and Brisbane are going to want to make sure they'll be satisfied first before giving up two very good young players. There's a reason that trade week goes as long as it does and it isn't to appease an impatient AFL supporter base.
:thumbsu::thumbsu:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Old Spice

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 27, 2013
Posts
9,060
Likes
11,956
Location
Thornbury
AFL Club
Collingwood
Because it looks as if GWS want pick 28 from Carlton. Carlton will get pick 28 from Adelaide in the Menzel deal (trade 1). Pick 28 (and pick 20/21) will go from Carlton to GWS as a part of the four player deal (trade 2). GWS will then have pick 20/21, pick 27 and pick 28 in this years draft, presumably they don't need all of them. As such, pick 28 will likely come to Collingwood as a part of the Treloar deal (trade 3). Due to Brisbane having academy kids they want to pick up this year, they're likely to want two second rounders this year to help pay for them (which might be why we haven't done a deal for pick 26 and St.Kilda's 2016 second rounder). Finally, we might give up pick 26 and pick 28 for Aish (trade 4). Brisbane might want to pick up Bastinac from North with pick 26 or pick 28 (trade 5).

However, why can't GWS just give us pick 27 now and be done with it? Because they then don't have the insurance of holding both pick 27 and pick 28. So understandably they want the Carlton deal to go through first (although they might be angling to get both pick 20 and pick 21 from Carlton). At the other end, what if North won't take pick 26 or pick 28 for Bastinac? Will Brisbane take pick 26 and pick 28 for Aish without assurance that Bastinac is coming for one of those picks? What if North want a pick in the low 20's for Bastinac? Will GWS give up pick 20/21 for Treloar? Would Brisbane give up pick 20/21 for Bastinac instead of pick 26?

Of course, I'm just speculating here (and likely to be wrong), but it's a very complicated process with other deals constantly hinging on other deals. Just because Hine isn't giving us hourly updates doesn't mean he isn't working his backside off to get deals done.



There's this really frustrating need for instant gratification throughout this thread. Dominoes clearly need to fall before we can land our players. We're the ones getting the big fish here and as such we'll get our players last. GWS and Brisbane are going to want to make sure they'll be satisfied first before giving up two very good young players. There's a reason that trade week goes as long as it does and it isn't to appease an impatient AFL supporter base.
I reckon Brisbane want Carlton's pick 21 plus another 2nd round for Aish. That may be the hold up from us 'not closing'.
 

CFC2010

Premium Gold
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Posts
17,188
Likes
29,720
AFL Club
Collingwood
Aren't we waiting for Carlton to trade in 4 players and give off their 2nd rounder which we get and pass on for Aish?

That would be my guess. Carlton, GWS, Brisbane, Pies mega deal.
That is what Eddie and Hine said and inturn what I posted yesterday but most here do not want to listen.

Most people are busy trying to hold up the sky!!!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DAWESOME!!

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Posts
6,618
Likes
8,735
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
North and Brisbane have ****** us over beautifully re Aish. By swapping 17 for Bastinac and a stack of second round picks:
- Brisbane now have enough points to get what their Academy kids this year, and have already got Bell and Bastinac.
- North now have a pick before us in the ND, that Aish definitely won't get past, before we pick
- Carlton will get him if he goes in the PSD.

Let's the Lions shift the goal posts on us last minute and say they only want 2016 picks and basically give them a pretext to not trade with us. Aish's options then are re-sign with the Lions or go to North or the Blues.

They've shafted us as well as they can.
 

MAGPIE2013

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Posts
2,151
Likes
1,822
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Arizona Cardinals, Man United,
CONFIRMED TRADE

Carlton Receive: Pick No.8, Plowman, Lamb, Phillips & Sumner.
Carlton Lose: Picks 28, 77 & 95 & Geelong's 2016 1st-Rd Pick for Henderson.

GWS Receive: Picks 28, 77 & 95 & Geelong's 2016 1st-Rd Pick for Henderson.
GWS Lose: Pick No.8, Plowman, Lamb, Phillips & Sumner.
 

Kilmo

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Posts
3,559
Likes
5,402
Location
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
AFL Club
Collingwood
North and Brisbane have stuffed us over beautifully re Aish. By swapping 17 for Bastinac and a stack of second round picks:
- Brisbane now have enough points to get what their Academy kids this year, and have already got Bell and Bastinac.
- North now have a pick before us in the ND, that Aish definitely won't get past, before we pick
- Carlton will get him if he goes in the PSD.

Let's the Lions shift the goal posts on us last minute and say they only want 2016 picks and basically give them a pretext to not trade with us. Aish's options then are re-sign with the Lions or go to North or the Blues.

They've shafted us as well as they can.
Incorrect. If we miss out on Aish (which we won't) we continue as we are.
They have shafted themselves - they lose out on compensation for a first round player.
 

Kilmo

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Posts
3,559
Likes
5,402
Location
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
AFL Club
Collingwood
CONFIRMED TRADE

Carlton Receive: Pick No.8, Plowman, Lamb, Phillips & Sumner.
Carlton Lose: Picks 28, 77 & 95 & Geelong's 2016 1st-Rd Pick for Henderson.

GWS Receive: Picks 28, 77 & 95 & Geelong's 2016 1st-Rd Pick for Henderson.
GWS Lose: Pick No.8, Plowman, Lamb, Phillips & Sumner.
Classic CARLTON

Out: 1st Rd, 2nd Rd, 4th Rd, 5th Rd

In: Four Mediocre NEAFL Players, One Mediocre WAFL Player (Pick 8)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom