Greening another one that was elite level talent.
Phil Carman absolute super star
And Greening played more than 100 games so he SHOULD be there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Greening another one that was elite level talent.
Phil Carman absolute super star
Buckley was a true superstar of the game.not a bad list. I'd have daicos above bucks buts it's understandable having bucks higher than daicos.
Buckley is probably the most consistent player we'd ever seen and probably responsible for the ultra professionalism we see in today's footballer. He was able to play in Any position bar ruck and did well when required to do so. Was one of the nicest kicks we've seen at Collingwood and a brilliant player who got as much out of himself as he possibly could. Buckets never left anything on the table.
Daicos, and let's not kids ourselves injuries curtiailed him, was and out and marvel. Had every every attribute required and had genuine X factor and a unparalleled skill set, was a gun midfielder and, with a shot body, became a goal scoring machine. Made the impossible a possibility almost every week and left us bewildered with some of his miraculous feats. Still my number 1 footballer I've sever seen. Bucks only a hair or 2 away.
The most interesting choice I found was pendles ahead of swanny... don't agree with this. Swanny,imo, was a better footballer than pendles. Both the complete opposite of eachother, but club greats, but I'd take Sean to over pendles. I still think swanky was more damaging. Pendles, like bucks, does all things in he background to extract all his ability, whereas swanny, was just a talented footballer who could play and had fun doing it. Swanny should have also had 2 brownlows, not 1.
Buckley was a true superstar of the game.
Indisputable for mine.
And best long passing I've seen.
Just a consistent super star.
Pendlebury v Swan, a great discussion, but Pendlebury to me a better player and overall more top line years
Fab Phil super GUN.Agree. Carman best I've ever seen.
But fell short of required games played on Michael Roberts criteria
Fab Phil super GUN.
SUPER SUPER FIT, Neil Craig once told a story how he was lapped at preseason training by Philat Norwood,freaked him out, was the fittest bloke at Collingwood by a long long way.
On a side note how SOFT is our team compared to those legends
Brown,Coventry,collier,Tuddy,millane, shaw, rose
I'd back em every time
Current lot no chance
THOSE GUYS wouldn't stand for this.
In order, the best pies I have seen are
1 Daicos
2 Thommo
3 Buckley
I have often wondered how good Rose was, as I find it hard to imagine a better mid sized player than Peter Daicos.
This.And Greening played more than 100 games so he SHOULD be there
This.
This bloke would have been one of the best players ever. Fast, an amazing high mark, could kick bags and an unbelievable ball winner. He was already absolutely great and his career being largely ended by 21 years of age by that St Kilda dog is one of the travesties and tragedies of the game. One of my older Collingwood supporting relatives reckons losing him cost us probably 3-4 premierships in the 70's and early 80's and looking at his form line in 1972 before he was felled it is hard to argue with that.
Bah, can't see many of those on the list making their way into the current star studded line up we have.
Obviously with the old timers, you can only appreciate going via black and white vision and stats on how good they were, but out of the players I have seen I might sneak in Daicos and Buckley, as long as he isn't player coach.
I just can't help going back into the distant past, look at their records, look at the old articles etcI actually only ever comment on the players I've seen personally.
Lee ahead of Coventry is controversial especially given the latters standing in the game, but it's not necessarily something I disagree with. Lee's career is even more remarkable when you consider how much footy he missed, basically the seasons where he didn't lead the league goal kicking he was injured. Without injury he could have played 300 games and kicked 1000 goals and there's no doubt he'd been more highly spoken about had he reached those figures.Between 1906 and 1922, during what was then a Victorian Football League record seventeen consecutive seasons, Lee played 230 V.F.L. games for Collingwood and kicked 713 goals. He headed the V.F.L. goal-kicking ladder eight times (1907-10, 1914, 1916-17, 1919) and tied for the lead twice (1915, 1921)—a record which has not been challenged. Lee was players' representative for nine years (1909-12, 1915-19), vice-captain twice (1910-11) and captain twice (1920-21). He played in three premiership teams (1910, 1917, 1919) and after retirement as a player served Collingwood for an additional sixteen years as vice-president (1923-34, 1950-53). Injuries seriously hindered his playing career.
Lee twice (1910, 1915) won the greatest distinction bestowed on footballers in his day, Champion Player of the Colony. He could star in defence or on the ball as well as at full-forward and he was one of the truly great high marks, arguably the equal of Roy Cazaly. Lee's marking has been described as 'freakish' and photographs of him taking the ball high over other players have been reproduced countless times. He was also a great kick, extremely adept with drop-kick or punt but especially proficient in the place-kick. According to Harry Collier (captain of Collingwood 1935-39) Lee could place-kick a goal from the boundary line without seeing daylight between the goalposts—even at a rival ground with kids throwing oranges trying to knock the ball over!
http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/lee-walter-henry-dick-7152
Lee ahead of Coventry is controversial especially given the latters standing in the game, but it's not necessarily something I disagree with. Lee's career is even more remarkable when you consider how much footy he missed, basically the seasons where he didn't lead the league goal kicking he was injured. Without injury he could have played 300 games and kicked 1000 goals and there's no doubt he'd been more highly spoken about had he reached those figures.
EDIT: He missed 72 games throughout his career and another 13 due to shortened seasons in the war years. Here's what he played in those part seasons: 1912 - 1 game; 1913 - 5 games; 1918 - 7 games; 1920 - 10 games; 1922 - 14 games (but well behind the leading goal kicker who snagged 18 more goals from just 2 more matches).
Probably a tad, but just not at our top liners level.Anyone else think Sav Rocca is underrated? 14th on the list of all time goals, not sure he makes it to the 25 but must be close
Fantastic point.Lee ahead of Coventry is controversial especially given the latters standing in the game, but it's not necessarily something I disagree with. Lee's career is even more remarkable when you consider how much footy he missed, basically the seasons where he didn't lead the league goal kicking he was injured. Without injury he could have played 300 games and kicked 1000 goals and there's no doubt he'd been more highly spoken about had he reached those figures.
EDIT: He missed 72 games throughout his career and another 13 due to shortened seasons in the war years. Here's what he played in those part seasons: 1912 - 1 game; 1913 - 5 games; 1918 - 7 games; 1920 - 10 games; 1922 - 14 games (but well behind the leading goal kicker who snagged 18 more goals from just 2 more matches).
I reckon Michael Roberts has done a stellar job here.
The top 20 are 100% correct, I can't think of anyone I could swap out, or in to that top 20. After that it becomes a debate about many players, both recent and pre WW2, who could slide into those final 5 positions.
Hope this link isn't paywalled for most;
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/sp...s/news-story/26abcc812c88d290851697ea083675dc
If it is, here's the top 25;
1. Bob Rose
2. Nathan Buckley
3. Syd Coventry
4. Albert Collier
5. Harry Collier
6. Dick Lee
7. Peter Daicos
8. Gordon Coventry
9. Len Thompson
10. Scott Pendlebury
11. Des Fothergill
12. Dane Swan
13. Phonse Kyne
14. Jack Regan
15. Wayne Richardson
16. Gavin Brown
17. Murray Weideman
18. Bill Picken
19. Tony Shaw
20. Peter Mckenna
21. Des Tuddenham
22. Peter Moore
23. Thorold Merrett
24. Darren Millane
25. Dick Condon
Discuss, pick apart, or just enjoy.
Nathan Buckley not in top ten?You can find fault in everyone, Picken couldnt kick, Shaw couldnt kick over a jam tin, only came good under Matthews, before that he was a decent player in some weak teams.
Buckley does not deserve to be in top ten ....... no premierships, would have Daicos higher.
If McKenna is in there and he should be, Barry Price should be as well, McKenna should be higher.
A lot of those players no one alive now actually saw them play or if they did they would have been very young.
Nathan Buckley not in top ten?
Sorry, just can't understand the logic there? Nearly won us a premiership off his play, 2002, what a game.
Forget that, but flags help CVs but I'm certain Bob Skilton, Haydn Bunton are not lesser players with only one final game between them.
Buckley and high level elite consistent play was standard. As good a long passer as you would see. True kick.
Mesmerising player.
Personally, I think Buckley is under rated overall, if he played for anyone else he'd be higher up the pecking order.
I've long felt Collingwood players have to do that bit more to get the recognition.
Eg: how a very good player Steve Silvagni was rated best full back of the century over Jack Regan was bizzaro world. Silvagni wasn't even better than Geoff Southby at Carlton. But anyway.