I’d like us to do bothJust.............WIN!
That's literally all it takes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I’d like us to do bothJust.............WIN!
That's literally all it takes.
I’d like us to do both
We saw, in the first half of 2016, that winning isn't enough.
Time to circle the wagons again, the smoke signals are pretty easy to read.
Bring back PAgan’s siege mentality. Take the gloves off and start f*n swinging.
Time to circle the wagons again, the smoke signals are pretty easy to read.
We saw, in the first half of 2016, that winning isn't enough.
EFAHe’s officially turned.
I consider him an enema.
I want Amarfio’s first order of business to call out Barrett for his putrid article.
Yep, that article was Caro-esque. He’s gone from tantrums to malevolent and outright dangerous if he keeps this up. If there is an AFL agenda in place, he’s the new mouthpiece.He’s officially turned.
I consider him an enemy.
The new CEO is our war time consigliereTime to circle the wagons again, the smoke signals are pretty easy to read.
Yep, that article was Caro-esque. He’s gone from tantrums to malevolent and outright dangerous if he keeps this up. If there is an AFL agenda in place, he’s the new mouthpiece.
This being in the middle of the article, while mentioning the cost of giving people boot, and not mentioning how good our financial position in recent years has been tell you all you need to know about how the media/AFL will try to shaft us. Historically unsuccessful. Bad at managing the club and their finances. Wouldn't even be surviving if not for Tassie. etc etcThe regularly struggling club - the one which took 50 years to win its first VFL premiership, which was forced into a private ownership structure in the 1980s as a last-resort survival project, which the AFL was desperate to move to the Gold Coast in the late 2000s – is again in a vulnerable state.
"There is clearly a deal to be made for North in Tasmania, a potentially lucrative one which could see the club maintain an 11 "home" game arrangement in Melbourne as well as servicing eight or nine matches in Hobart and Launceston."
In what alternate universe could 11 home games in Melbourne, and 8-9 in Tassie for 1 club be even a remote possibility ? this sounds more like the ravings of a lunatic than an officially sanctioned ? journalist to be honest.
Anyway, Geelong should be complaining about the "replacement games" system because several times they've had to play home games at Etihad/Marvel to accommodate our Hobart setup. It's not fair on them and it's a temporary salve at best.
Wtf is that about with Tom Lynch? I'd assume he didn't pick up the phone because he was never called
An alternative view...
An alternative view...
"There is clearly a deal to be made for North in Tasmania, a potentially lucrative one which could see the club maintain an 11 "home" game arrangement in Melbourne as well as servicing eight or nine matches in Hobart and Launceston."
In what alternate universe could 11 home games in Melbourne, and 8-9 in Tassie for 1 club be even a remote possibility ? this sounds more like the ravings of a lunatic than an officially sanctioned ? journalist to be honest.