TennisPlayerAndy
Game #6 Klay
- Apr 1, 2008
- 57,716
- 101,749
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Raiders, GSW, QPR, NYM
I think I need to move onto Damo Axe Watch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If by that you mean you are thinking of hitting him with an axe then I might have to join you.I think I need to move onto Damo Axe Watch.
If by that you mean you are thinking of hitting him with an axe then I might have to join you.
This is happening, I've noticed as well.I wouldn't worry about Barrett and the impact he has on the image of the club. He's overreached. His criticism of all things North is so consistent, so vindicative and so so stupid that even oppo supporters can see through it and are bored by it. He's made himself irrelevant.
This is happening, I've noticed as well.
I did actually read his last bit of crap on GRs link.
Is he using Rhyce's situation to attack Buckley and Arch again?
Cos that is pretty low.
He did refer to Rhyce’s payout as an issue. He is a lowlife.
As I said in the other thread I hope one day Barrett gets into a lift and archer gets in and closes the door.
The guy needs to be given a wake up call
Not sure if anyone else heard Jeff Kennett on Derwayne's World today?
Correct what I'm recalling but they were talking about scheduling next year and JK was of the opinion that clubs that are unassisted (e.g. NMFC) deserve good scheduling regardless of their ladder position as they're the ones that aren't dragging the AFL down and if they (e.g. we) don't get good scheduling it would hinder the AFL's recovery and the strong position that those clubs have worked hard to be in. I would assume HFC are about to announce a small profit too then if that's the case, he wouldn't be out talking charity if it didn't benefit him in some way.
Rhyce was paid out before October 31st and Scott's contract was paid out this year already, so their payments wont impact the soft cap for 2021 and we still made a profit despite paying out all the coaches.
I don't understand how we would be liable to pay out Rhyce for 2021. He will not be able to perform his contracted duties, a situation that should be covered by insurance, but releases the club of any obligations.
Obviously he earned and is entitled to be paid for 2020, which I assume you're referring to in relation to his payout.
It makes sense though. The big clubs draw a crowd regardless of time slot. If they are limiting numbers to games, they will have no trouble getting maximum attendance.Not sure if anyone else heard Jeff Kennett on Derwayne's World today?
Correct what I'm recalling but they were talking about scheduling next year and JK was of the opinion that clubs that are unassisted (e.g. NMFC) deserve good scheduling regardless of their ladder position as they're the ones that aren't dragging the AFL down and if they (e.g. we) don't get good scheduling it would hinder the AFL's recovery and the strong position that those clubs have worked hard to be in. I would assume HFC are about to announce a small profit too then if that's the case, he wouldn't be out talking charity if it didn't benefit him in some way.
The wording was it was a mutual agreement to part ways, I think we probably offered something, doubt it was his full contract. I doubt we would have thrown him under the bus either.
Regardless, the media claims that our soft cap will be hampered by the Scott termination and Shaw departing are wrong.
The fact that we had to pay Scott for this year still annoys me. So much for him being an honourable person.
And the fact that we made a profit after giving this dead weight his free money is quite stunning.
I have no problem with reaching a settlement with Rhyce, of course.
Hell hath no fury as an AFL journo scorned. Damian now throwing a tantrum. Soft and can't abide rejection.I think we know who froze him out at Arden Street.
The former. And I reckon Buckley is letting him look like a goose.Is Barrett having a whack out of history of personal animosity between him the club or Archer and Buckley?
Or is his whack coming from the AFL? Very low to complain about having to pay Shaw for not coaching given the personal circumstances.
Is Barrett having a whack out of history of personal animosity between him the club or Archer and Buckley?
Or is his whack coming from the AFL? Very low to complain about having to pay Shaw for not coaching given the personal circumstances.
Barrett is just having a whack full stop. He gets aroused thinking about North's demise.Is Barrett having a whack out of history of personal animosity between him the club or Archer and Buckley?
Or is his whack coming from the AFL? Very low to complain about having to pay Shaw for not coaching given the personal circumstances.