Contact below the knees... Time to go!

(Log in to remove this ad.)

giggler99

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 5, 2011
Posts
6,492
Likes
6,290
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Victory, Napoli, Liverpool, Pens
#29
We have two of these threads, mods merge.

If you win the ball at ground level it shouldn't be a free against you if another player falls over you, the interpretation is the problem not the rule itself, this is what happens when you bring in knee jerk rules and don't trial them as the AFL have a habit of doing.
 

Hawthorn United

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Posts
13,405
Likes
10,023
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
MUFC, Storm, Rebels
#33
Been a shit rule or interpretation of it for 3 years. Kinda glad it happened in a big game for some attention to brought to it, similar to how Shuey brought attention to the shoulder shrug.

Introducing that rule just made kicking in danger or high contact become very ambiguous.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 

Hawthorn United

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Posts
13,405
Likes
10,023
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
MUFC, Storm, Rebels
#35
Brayshaw's head literally hit him in the lower thigh, but free kick for "below the knees? As said above, the issue isn't so much with the rule, but how umpires are implementing it.
Once the player standing up falls over due to contact to the legs, they usually pay it.

Been like that for the past 3 years. Not that i agree with it, but there's been not outcry in all that time.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Posts
802
Likes
1,287
Location
1964
AFL Club
Melbourne
#38
Once the player standing up falls over due to contact to the legs, they usually pay it.

Been like that for the past 3 years. Not that i agree with it, but there's been not outcry in all that time.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Tbh, when I first saw it, I thought free kick for that exact reason. But then after the replay I thought there is no way that should be a free, and if it is, we need to change the rule.
 

doppleganger

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Posts
15,780
Likes
6,830
Location
Putney
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Collingwood
#40
A big problem is commentators keeping on talking about sliding...that isn’t part of the rule. Also whether a player was 1st to the ball or not isn’t relevant.

The problem is that the action is potentially dangerous, if a player makes contact below the knees and a players foot is planted they risk knee or ankle injury.

So the rule is designed to penalise players who go lower and harder, something that people have watched and applauded for 100 years.

The biggest problem for mine is that randomly you will see games where player get awarded a free kick for too high when they have actually taken a player below the knees with their head...best case being 2016 GF when Dogs players consistently took Swans players legs out with no frees against. Eastern Wood caved Hannerz knee in for fecks sake and just play on.

So yes, Lewis and Brayshaw should have been penalised for going lower as it has the potential to cause injury.

And McGovern shouldn’t have got a free for too high last week when he dove down as DeGoey ran in...

the AFL doesn’t want players diving on the ball, umpires enforced the rules correctly...they needs to ensure the commentators are educated better, Carey has no idea, as the general public listen to theirbleating.
 

IKnowtheDog

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Posts
5,208
Likes
4,046
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Seattle Seahawks
#42
Gunston ran into Brayshaw, not Brayshaw into Gunston. Have no problem with the rule. The issue is players risking their body and fellow team mates body in trying to draw the free kick. The commentators are clueless just like they are in all other rules
 

footy75

Club Legend
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Posts
2,319
Likes
1,421
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Norwood, Melbourne Storm
#45
I have been fed up with this rule for a while. It is utter, utter garbage.
It NEVER feels right to see a guy go down to pick up the ball and the guy standing there not going for the ball gets the free kick.
Just pay a free kick if someone slides in legs first.
What a trash rule and I'm sick of seeing them paid.
2 of them paid within 5 minutes tonight.
spot on

worst rule ever
 

Papa Juggs

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
30,099
Likes
12,343
Location
South Brisbane
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Liverpool
#48
Umpires are getting it wrong. It's the spirit of the rule that needs to be considered more which is don't slide in late and take the legs not don't be on your hands and knees while some idiot trips up on you.
 
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
51,243
Likes
25,479
Location
Beach
AFL Club
Collingwood
#49
Its a bit like the kicking in danger rule. Umpires have never had a problem interpreting this. If you kick a ball gently or toe-poke it in the vicinity of an opponents hands you wont get pinged.....because its not putting anyone "in danger".

I really cant see why or how this "sliding rule" cant be umpired with the same common sense. If youre likely to cause injury through rough below-the-knees contact then thats the line where the umpire blows the whistle. Otherwise he puts the whistle away and lets the guy who was first to the ball, keep the ball.

Additionally if the slide was a seperate first action (protecting space before the ball gather) then its also a free kick
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom