- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
That bit I can agree with.Yeah but even that purpose was misguided ... i don't mind Gibson but he is not what we need , was never going to be .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That bit I can agree with.Yeah but even that purpose was misguided ... i don't mind Gibson but he is not what we need , was never going to be .
Until tonight they could still argue that we were a mathematical chance of making the finals, particularly given the players we have returning after the bye. That being the case, they still had to go with the best possible team, in the hope of making the finals.True but I don't think it really matters anymore. The club needs to accept that this season is over and place an emphasis on developing youth. If this leads to a few horrific beltings, who cares? We are already getting belted and there's no prize for finishing mid table.
The bolded bit is key. We were still mathematically in the hunt until this loss. As such, they had to focus on winning. Finals are now completely gone, so they're now free to change that focus.Claiming there are no viable replacements is the exact sort of thinking that gets a club into this sort of situation in the first place.
Every non injured player is a viable replacement if you don't focus on winning as much.
Every player on our list is on there for a reason. That reason is we think they might be good enough. So when we have 10+ non injured blokes running around in the SANFL there is no such thing as "no viable replacements"
It's so clear to me that fixing our accountability issue is more important than winning and has been for a while now.The bolded bit is key. We were still mathematically in the hunt until this loss. As such, they had to focus on winning. Finals are now completely gone, so they're now free to change that focus.
Mackay probably wouldn't have played tonight if they'd had any options at all performing in the SANFL. Atkins could well have joined him on the sidelines. Having zero options makes it very difficult for the selectors to drop anyone.It's so clear to me that fixing our accountability issue is more important than winning and has been for a while now.
While we still have senior players dishing up absolute garbage at random we will never win a flag
Hampton and Murphy would have offered just as much as Mackay and Atkins except we wouldn't be rewarding s**t senior players with more AFL gamesMackay probably wouldn't have played tonight if they'd had any options at all performing in the SANFL. Atkins could well have joined him on the sidelines. Having zero options makes it very difficult for the selectors to drop anyone.
We rewarded our best performed SANFL player in Wilson tonight. I like him but he was miles off it.Hampton and Murphy would have offered just as much as Mackay and Atkins except we wouldn't be rewarding s**t senior players with more AFL games
You're talking about rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.Hampton and Murphy would have offered just as much as Mackay and Atkins except we wouldn't be rewarding s**t senior players with more AFL games
We did, but we dropped Murphy to get him in.We rewarded our best performed SANFL player in Wilson tonight. I like him but he was miles off it.
The only caveat to that, is that weve cooked seasoned players. What have we done to the kids ??We did, but we dropped Murphy to get him in.
What was the point of that? If it was Wilson replacing Atkins, that would have been much better
WTF? Gallucci replaced Murphy. Wilson replaced CEY. (Otten/Fog, Cheney/Brown).We did, but we dropped Murphy to get him in.
What was the point of that? If it was Wilson replacing Atkins, that would have been much better
You're talking about rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Besides which, Murphy hasn't been offering "just as much as Mackay and Atkins". He had 2 touches in the first 3 quarters last week. That's not acceptable for any player, not even a young rookie. Mackay and Atkins have been woeful, Murphy has been worse.
Hampton is gone at the end of the year, and they're understandably reluctant to waste games on a player who isn't a part of the club's future.
CEY was completely cooked, and Murphy was giving us nothing. Gallucci was a huge upgrade on Murphy, and Wilson got a development game. That's purpose on both selections.Rearranging the deck chairs is dropping Murphy and CEY for Gallucci and Wilson. Serves absolutely no purpose.
Dropping an underperforming Atkins for a player that's no better does help. It tells Atkins to play better
CEY was completely cooked, and Murphy was giving us nothing. Gallucci was a huge upgrade on Murphy, and Wilson got a development game. That's purpose on both selections.
Punitive selections are just plain stupid. The players are playing poorly because they are mentally shot and completely bereft of confidence. Dropping them for punitive reasons just makes things even worse.
Brown was injured, and they dropped the 3 worst performed players from last week's game. We might have seen more changes, if they had anyone worth picking playing in the SANFL.Same deck chair shuffling
There's a time and a place, but right now is not the time or the place, because of the team's mental state. All that would achieve is sending things spiralling even further down into the pit.I don't think punitive selections makes things worse but clearly we disagree on that
There's a time and a place, but right now is not the time or the place, because of the team's mental state. All that would achieve is sending things spiralling even further down into the pit.
I'm not against dropping players who are out of form. I am against punitive droppings, particularly under the current circumstances.
Much easier to do that when you don't have 8 players on the injury list, and at least 3 more who are playing under levels of duress which would normally see them sidelined.I think some players would benefit from finding form away from the spotlight of an underperforming side.
Some players are being sent out there every week knowing they are going to play poorly. Maybe sending them to the SANFL would help them rediscover some confidence against easier opponents
Much easier to do that when you don't have 8 players on the injury list, and at least 3 more who are playing under levels of duress which would normally see them sidelined.
Until this week they had to keep the focus on winning games. Every team does that, while they still have a mathematical chance of making the finals. Team selections have to reflect this - pick the best available team, and hope they can get the job done. We won't be a mathematical chance by the time we come back from the bye, so the focus can now change.
Wilson has been our best SANFL player, and he got 5 touches tonight. That's the difference between the players currently in the team, and those playing in the SANFL. That's why they've been reluctant to drop senior players, until now.
If the alternative is Signorello or Edwards? You leave the senior player in, and drop them as soon as the injury list permits.
It's all very well saying "somebody needs to do something"... but there has to be something you can actually do. Right now, there isn't.
You haven't watched Pyke's presser yet have you ?? He basically opens with, we've got 6 wins, history says you need to win 12 to make it, so we need 6 wins from the next 9 games.The bolded bit is key. We were still mathematically in the hunt until this loss. As such, they had to focus on winning. Finals are now completely gone, so they're now free to change that focus.
Yeah and after the next 2 games it will be needing 6 from 7 games to scrape into 8th.You haven't watched Pyke's presser yet have you ?? He basically opens with, we've got 6 wins, history says you need to win 12 to make it, so we need 6 wins from the next 9 games.