All Vic clubs should have to move to interstate hubs to maintain the season. There is no way they are going to have 0 cases anytime soon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Berejiklian took the early lead in most incompetent leader, with Palaszczuk's Hail Mary of local elections failing to steal the front position. Andrews started back of the track, but has the last month being slowly, but steadily been moving up the field. Can he snatch an unlikely victory here? His tactics of ignoring health advice (without the buck passing of NSW employed over the Ruby Princess) and still talking about opening up, whilst his state has outbreaks unlike everywhere else, let's just saySurely Andrews cannot be serious about relaxing restrictions in Victoria as planned on June 22?
According to the ABC Daniel Andrews has said that Victoria is committed to 'virus suppression rather than elimination'. That puts Andrews at odds with other states that appear to be on the cusp of eliminating the virus. It would appear that Victorians not realise that if they do not eliminate the virus Australia cannot eliminate it.
The Coburg cluster has now risen to 11 people with two schools closed and the source is still unknown. The Coburg cluster involves several extended families and is growing day by day. That is not even suppression it is a recipe for disaster.
The fact that two people have now tested positive after a protest rally in Melbourne must also tell Andrews that the virus is still out there and allowing crowds at sporting contests is a huge risk.
Surely Andrews cannot be serious about relaxing restrictions in Victoria as planned on June 22?
According to the ABC Daniel Andrews has said that Victoria is committed to 'virus suppression rather than elimination'. That puts Andrews at odds with other states that appear to be on the cusp of eliminating the virus. It would appear that Victorians not realise that if they do not eliminate the virus Australia cannot eliminate it.
The Coburg cluster has now risen to 11 people with two schools closed and the source is still unknown. The Coburg cluster involves several extended families and is growing day by day. That is not even suppression it is a recipe for disaster.
The fact that two people have now tested positive after a protest rally in Melbourne must also tell Andrews that the virus is still out there and allowing crowds at sporting contests in Victoria is a huge risk. Get 2 cases in 54 days as SA has done then you can think about crowds.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Elimination is not possible unless you maintain a 14 day quarantine for all international travellers at the bare minimum. That is simply not practical either.
Is the R(0) below 1 with the measures with have implemented? Yes. Is the medical health system at a point by which they have the necessary resources to handle any major outbreak going forward? Yes.
Based on this alone, there is zero reason not to continue lessening the restrictions.
Absolute rubbish. I have just heard Gladys Berejiklian say that international quarantine will stay as far as NSW goes. I suggest you take a close look at the number of cases that have been detected in quarantine.
Victoria has a problem and it is made worse because Victorians will not admit that they have a problem.
Might be staying for now, but a 14 day quarantine is not going to be kept in the long term even if a vaccine or form of treatment isn't found. And given that there has never been a efficacious vaccine produced for any type of corona virus over the last 40 years, i won't be holding my breath on that.
In the short term 14 day quarantining for overseas travellers a fine proposal because you don't have people for the most part travelling internationally anyway. But let's wait and see what the party line on this is at the end of the year - won't be surprised if it changes given these hard line stances have been changing as fast as Melbourne's weather over the past few months.
Can we open up to everyone except Victoria?
Would be impossible to monitor though
She shouldn't have a problem with it. Marshall closed borders. Tasmania is Lib and went first with closed borders. Closed or not isn't a party thing. Or handling it in general. The best two leaders out of this have been Marshall and McGowan, one Liberal one ALP. The worst two have been NSW and QLD's leaders, again one of each party.Vic 45
NSW 19
What really needs to happen is for Berejiklian to go against her right wing instincts and close the Victorian border. If NSW closed it's border with Victoria and SA maintained it's closed border Victoria would be isolated.
Sorry, but a 14 day quarantine period will be here to stay going forward. It may be relaxed with regards to trans Tasman Travel, but otherwise it will remain. It is the only way we will be able to safely open up our international borders:
She shouldn't have a problem with it. Marshall closed borders. Tasmania is Lib and went first with closed borders. Closed or not isn't a party thing. Or handling it in general. The best two leaders out of this have been Marshall and McGowan, one Liberal one ALP. The worst two have been NSW and QLD's leaders, again one of each party.
It could go beyond a Trans-Tasman bubble. Most South Pacific countries are free of the virus. If there's no cases in other countries they'd want to join in. Until there's at least better treatment (if not a vaccine) then a 'good' / 'bad' country divide could be done, as long as each 'good' country adhere's to a 14 day quarantine for anyone from a 'bad' country.Might be here for the foreseeable future. But let's say that a vaccine isn't produced (and based on history I doubt one does get produced), do you think that such a quarantine period would remain in place indefinitely?
I would postulate that having a 2 week quarantine period for every single overseas traveller or resident coming to Australia would no doubt kill international tourism trade if such a policy was still enforced in 12+ months from now.
As a short term solution it is a great way of getting the numbers down. At the same time, a balance remains necessary in the long term. One would hope that a more practical solution could be reached, even in the absence of a vaccine.
It could go beyond a Trans-Tasman bubble. Most South Pacific countries are free of the virus. If there's no cases in other countries they'd want to join in. Until there's at least better treatment (if not a vaccine) then a 'good' / 'bad' country divide could be done, as long as each 'good' country adhere's to a 14 day quarantine for anyone from a 'bad' country.
indeed. Border screening will be imperative. The highest risk will be from China, the US and transit countries.
I am still puzzled about some of these figures. Victoria has recorded 83 positive tests since June 1st including 45 cases in the past week yet has only 49 active cases and the active case tally in Victoria has dropped from 71 to 49 since June 1. One can only assume that the cases being detected are extremely mild and the patients recover very quickly or that these people have been out there that long they are no longer considered contagious. There is probably a logical explanation within the definition of 'active'.
I think the Victorian numbers are being confused with a count of the number of ministers still in their roles.I am still puzzled about some of these figures. Victoria has recorded 83 positive tests since June 1st including 45 cases in the past week yet has only 49 active cases and the active case tally in Victoria has dropped from 71 to 49 since June 1. One can only assume that the cases being detected are extremely mild and the patients recover very quickly or that these people have been out there that long they are no longer considered contagious. There is probably a logical explanation within the definition of 'active'.
Please be selective
gotta agree with this, the time we bought with shutdown was to limit spread but also to improve capacity to treat. Elimination without vaccine is an impossibility. Loosening restrictions while enforcing established quarantine for infected is the way forwardElimination is not possible unless you maintain a 14 day quarantine for all international travellers at the bare minimum. That is simply not practical either.
Is the R(0) below 1 with the measures with have implemented? Yes. Is the medical health system at a point by which they have the necessary resources to handle any major outbreak going forward? Yes.
Based on this alone, there is zero reason not to continue lessening the restrictions.
Agreed. If they open, say, to ACT residents, how do they know that I haven't driven over via Melbourne. Not that I would, as I'd love to get to Adelaide, but it'd be very hard to police
gotta agree with this, the time we bought with shutdown was to limit spread but also to improve capacity to treat. Elimination without vaccine is an impossibility. Loosening restrictions while enforcing established quarantine for infected is the way forward