Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory Coronavirus #2: Lockdowns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Thoughts on COVID-19? (Choose 2 options)

  • It's a naturally occurring virus

    Votes: 15 20.3%
  • It came from a Chinese laboratory

    Votes: 31 41.9%
  • It came from a US/other laboratory

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • It's dangerous and harsh restrictions are necessary

    Votes: 19 25.7%
  • It's not dangerous enough to warrant harsh restrictions

    Votes: 22 29.7%
  • It's basically another flu, so restrictions are silly

    Votes: 14 18.9%

  • Total voters
    74

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
lol ffs! These people will go to no end.


Better and safer yet, just never leave your house again. It’s just too scary.

Saw a mum with three little kids today, all in masks on a beautiful sunny day.
Only when she went INSIDE to the cafe and sat down (full of people ) did she take them off the kids.
I just feel so sorry for them.
 
“Nothing is more terrifying than when those that lead us recognise the ease with which they control us.

Lindsay Hoyle suggests we could be similarly controlled to stop climate change. “For the greater good”

 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

View attachment 1046667

It's a good thing we have alcohol & fast food to keep us healthy & strong though during this pandemic.

Evil now is it? Dictator Dan called it wicked. It's a virus, it can't be either of these things. I can think of an appropriate adjective for this guy, stupid.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Then go and look at the CNBC segment, which is based on an unscientific opinion piece and contains an add for masks made in China, this is how the media is complicit.

Fauci thinks it common sense but the 6000 subject random controlled trial found no statistical difference in wearing and not wearing a mask is subjects contracting COVID.

Among participants, the researchers evaluated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at 1 month based on positive antibody results, polymerase chain reaction or diagnosis at a hospital.

A total of 3,030 participants were assigned to wear masks and 2,994 were assigned to not wear masks.

Bundgaard and colleagues found that 1.8% of those who wore masks and 2.1% of those who did not wear masks tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. They determined that the difference between the groups was -0.03 percentage points


Critics of the study including the opinion giver, say this meant that masks were better and they critisised the gold standard RCT for having too small a numbers while relying on random observational studies they admit "but the studies are challenging to interpret due to the limitations of observational data." to support the theory of one mask and no data I found was available comparing two.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

View attachment 1046696

My thought's have been this, But the blame will be placed on those who don't receive the covid vaccine.
Interesting the so called "variants" have come from South Africa, UK and Brazil, three countries heavily involved in the vaccine trials.
Then there's this:
It's experimental & untested on the elderly. Here's recent ONS data from England & Wales.
1611790330713.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom