Conspiracy Theory Coronavirus #2: Lockdowns

Thoughts on COVID-19? (Choose 2 options)

  • It's a naturally occurring virus

    Votes: 15 20.3%
  • It came from a Chinese laboratory

    Votes: 31 41.9%
  • It came from a US/other laboratory

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • It's dangerous and harsh restrictions are necessary

    Votes: 19 25.7%
  • It's not dangerous enough to warrant harsh restrictions

    Votes: 22 29.7%
  • It's basically another flu, so restrictions are silly

    Votes: 14 18.9%

  • Total voters
    74

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The same people who whinge about dickheads breaking the rules get upset when you make legitimate criticism of their favourite dickhead politicians like Dictator Dan.
It doesn't do your case any benefit to use terms like Dictator Dan. There's evidence from other states that the premiers would've acted in largely the same way in the same situation.

The sidelining of opposition leaders and parliaments as a whole as been one of the worst bits of this saga. Challenge to policy inevitably results in better policies; groupthink without dissenting voices does the opposite.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Word is that the Australian government is about to launch an advertising campaign encouraging people to get the COVID Vax. $24 million dollars. It's gonna be everywhere and in everyone's face. Brace yourselves.
great

I really dont want to get this vaccination.

Im going to be torn if my work force us to do it
 
View attachment 1041072

More bullshit disinformation coming straight from the CDC.
Not only bullshite, absolutely heart breaking.
It’s when this sort of rubbish doesn’t wake people up I find most demoralising.
How can parents not see through the propaganda when it’s as blatant as this.
The agenda to dehumanise, de-socialise, divide and conquer couldn’t be clearer.
Makes my blood boil.
 
View attachment 1041381

This is a perfect example of how easy it's been for the msm to cause so much fear of something that's not even deadly.
They didn't mention that for most people, the death rate is 99.997%.

People that are at a higher risk, would have the same or worse risk from flu or colds and can be protected by increasing deficient Vit D levels, which help build up T Cells for immunity or protective HCQ, IVM, and Zn. Then there's the promising research showing UV light killing airborne virus and being tested in Australia in aged care.

But the fear pr0n is pedaled, and they are not being honest with the vaccine information which is seeing a very high serious adverse effect and death rate being reported in medical journals and some media. The death rates reported in BMJ in Norway is matching the incredibly high death rates reported in US in aged care facilities after vaccination, that had never had a COVID death.

Maybe it's that pesky "death by co-incidence" again?

 
great

I really dont want to get this vaccination.

Im going to be torn if my work force us to do it

My logic is, if it was 'safe' for the last 12 months to go into work without a vaccination, why force everyone. You'll still be able to get covid, spread covid, so we'll still be socially distancing and wearing masks.
 
I'll delete this link if it stuffs up the page like the last one did a few weeks ago

 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'll expand further on my last post and say, by logic (doesn't count for much), but if you are currently allowed to do something (and at capacity), you shouldn't then be required to get the vaccine.
Ie, if youre working and are busier than prior to covid (physically in a workplace), it was then deemed safe to work, so vaccination shouldnt be compulsory.
If you can currently train in a gym, a vaccination shouldnt be leverage to force you out.
Ditto interstate flights. If it's currently safe, then no vaccination shouldnt make a difference.

International flights has been affected, so should you WANT to fly, then unfortunately youre had by the balls...
 
HSBC has threatened to shut down the bank accounts of customers who refuse to wear a face mask in its UK branches.

Jackie Uhi, head of branch network, HSBC UK said that the company 'reserves the right to withdraw' the accounts of any customer who won't wear a face mask.

Next it will be, Vaccine's required to continue banking with us.

Unbelievable hysteria over nothing serious, A manufactured crisis the masses have bought into so easily.
 
Word is that the Australian government is about to launch an advertising campaign encouraging people to get the COVID Vax. $24 million dollars. It's gonna be everywhere and in everyone's face. Brace yourselves.
A pandemic so devastating and a vaccine so safe and effective it needs govt marketing to remind us all, over and over and over and over and over...
 
Last edited:
you get free oxygen in Mexico if you have CV 19

not everyone dies not everyone goes to hospital

 
Word is that the Australian government is about to launch an advertising campaign encouraging people to get the COVID Vax. $24 million dollars. It's gonna be everywhere and in everyone's face. Brace yourselves.
Aimed at woman aged 30 to 39! Was flicking through the channels to find the cricket this morning, and saw (think it was Ch 10) Dr Andrew Rochford discussing this ad campaign. Host (Sarah Harris?) said "Why are they targeting women in that age group? It's my age group and I'll be first in line."

He answered that it could be because the vaccine could cause infertility in women. She looked stunned and there was an awkward silence, then he carried on and said it could also be that women are decision makers in the household and influence others getting the vaccine or some other rubbish.
1610791635333.png

Then I searched for Dr Yeadon's and Dr Wolfgang Wodarg's submission to the European Medical Agency (EMA) and found at least 10 entries saying this was debunked and Dr Yeadon is not Pfizer's head of research.

Dr Yeadon never claimed to be Pfizer's head of research, but is an ex-Pfizer Vice President of Respiratory medicine. He's also BSc biochem tox, PhD respiratory pharmacol, 32y new meds research. 2012 founded biotech Ziarco, sold to Novartis 2017. Dr Wodarg is a lung specialist and former head of the German public health department.

Part of the petition was asked that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, because they haven't been already excluded. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

1. to eliminate whether antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, occurs. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.

2. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.


Pfizer started mice experiments with pregnancy but when their report came out in December, deliberately did not report on them and said they were "ongoing". From Feb and March? How long does it take a mouse to get pregnant or give birth. SO it's possible but "unknown", as the UK warning states, if the mRNA vaccine can cause infertility, and it would comprehensive animal studies at the very least but these have not happened.

Very interesting is again without animal studies, they have started human studies on men to see whether the vaccine causes sterility in males. According to Dr Bruce Y. Lee in Forbes "There has been evidence that the acute viral infection can lead to orchitis, or inflammation of the testicles. The presence of ACE2 receptors in the testicles may mean that the coronavirus has a proclivity to set up shop in the scrotal sac."

3. The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.

4. The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top