- Sep 27, 2012
- 28,095
- 55,431
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers Tottenham Hotspur
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Especially when it doesn't seem to make any difference - quarantine, lockdowns continue for everyone. Fully vaccinated people can't see their relatives/babies in hospital.Let’s just get this straight, we have to have a vaccine, that was rushed, isn’t really proven and has been linked to cases of blood clots, heart attacks etc, in order to “get our lives back”. Does this not seem insane to people??
But again, the big concern for me has always been how are things going to look once all of the cards have fallen because imo, we certainly are not going back to any semblance of 'normal'. For better or worse, it's a new, evolving world now. History says it will be the latter.
CP3 in the NBA has been vaccinated yet tested positive and has to isolate, missing important playoff games. Why TF are we getting vaccinated again? Seems to achieve absolutely nothing other than scoring wokie pointsEspecially when it doesn't seem to make any difference - quarantine, lockdowns continue for everyone. Fully vaccinated people can't see their relatives/babies in hospital.
LOL. Bit late for this!because the longer it takes, the harder it's going to be to take our liberties back.
We have no chance of seeing what it's going to look like until most of us have had the vaccine. Sooner the better imo because the longer it takes, the harder it's going to be to take our liberties back.
Posts this logical about covid can get you banned, be careful...Ok, I understand your reasoning and that is certainly the carrot being dangled from on high if we want out of this, but consider the actual statistically verifiable, scientifically endorsed and approved data. We're talking an avg mortality age which is higher than the avg life expectancy age. Do you think that that info is significant? Is it not unreasonable to take that in to account when making a decision on whether or not to roll up the sleeve? I think a lot of people have done exactly that(and other factors eg expedited trials) so it's going to be a hard sell reaching the magic %, imo.
As I said earlier, I'm not worried about anything untoward going on with the vaccines, but for the life of me I cannot work out why we don't just vaccinate the vulnerable and give everyone else the option. As for the polio/smallpox line that gets trotted out regularly, I am betting dollars to doughnuts that the average mortality age for both was a hell of a lot lower than the average life expectancy age. Does this mean I don't care about the elderly? Not at all, but we need to look at this holistically, taking in to account all factors(impacts of lockdowns etc).
The reality is that this virus - while still serious for a very small minority - is nowhere near as bad as we first thought. For most it's quite benign and not an issue. In the UK, COVID is not even on their most deadly virus list! It's not viewed as high risk(or was last time I checked).
A question for you - if the messaging was not "the only way out of this is for everyone to get vaccinated", would you still have got your vaccination? Put another way - are you worried about the virus itself or 'doing the rightie/taking one for the team'? Remembering the actual statistics about who is getting sick and perishing(not case numbers which are frankly farcical given the amount of asymptomatic/mild confirmed cases and the horribly not fit for purpose PCR tests).
I read the post you directed me to, and we are on the same page except for this. Right fromthe start we were told the vaccine was safe, any talk of adverse reactions was censored, and the reports were written off as a coincidence. Lots of "there is no evidence to link these to the vaccine". When they couldn't be ignored any longer they became "extremely rare". The media now has had to drop the "extremely" from it, they are just "rare" now. How long before it becomes "uncommon", and after that Fauci is going to be on tv telling everyone that the risks were known from the start.In my opinion, from all of the data that has been accumulated thus far, it's clear that the risk of any sort of adverse reaction from the vaccines is infinitesimally small.
High altitude is a risk factor for blood clots. Perhaps the adverse effects of the vaccine are being magnified by other factors like altitude and sitting still for a long time.What’s going on with the 4 dead BA pilots?
And now UA pilots don’t have to take the vaccine anymore.
Ok, I understand your reasoning and that is certainly the carrot being dangled from on high if we want out of this, but consider the actual statistically verifiable, scientifically endorsed and approved data. We're talking an avg mortality age which is higher than the avg life expectancy age. Do you think that that info is significant? Is it not unreasonable to take that in to account when making a decision on whether or not to roll up the sleeve? I think a lot of people have done exactly that(and other factors eg expedited trials) so it's going to be a hard sell reaching the magic %, imo.
As I said earlier, I'm not worried about anything untoward going on with the vaccines, but for the life of me I cannot work out why we don't just vaccinate the vulnerable and give everyone else the option. As for the polio/smallpox line that gets trotted out regularly, I am betting dollars to doughnuts that the average mortality age for both was a hell of a lot lower than the average life expectancy age. Does this mean I don't care about the elderly? Not at all, but we need to look at this holistically, taking in to account all factors(impacts of lockdowns etc).
The reality is that this virus - while still serious for a very small minority - is nowhere near as bad as we first thought. For most it's quite benign and not an issue. In the UK, COVID is not even on their most deadly virus list! It's not viewed as high risk(or was last time I checked).
A question for you - if the messaging was not "the only way out of this is for everyone to get vaccinated", would you still have got your vaccination? Put another way - are you worried about the virus itself or 'doing the rightie/taking one for the team'? Remembering the actual statistics about who is getting sick and perishing(not case numbers which are frankly farcical given the amount of asymptomatic/mild confirmed cases and the horribly not fit for purpose PCR tests).
High altitude is a risk factor for blood clots. Perhaps the adverse effects of the vaccine are being magnified by other factors like altitude and sitting still for a long time.
Altitude creates inflammation, higher radiation levels also have an impact. I covered this in studies in Amsterdam revolving around athletes and inflammatory reactions covering the disadvantages of air travel and ways to decrease the impact.High altitude is a risk factor for blood clots. Perhaps the adverse effects of the vaccine are being magnified by other factors like altitude and sitting still for a long time.
It would be interesting to see in depth analysis of adverse effects and all surrounding risk factors like the pill. It would help people make an informed choice. I won't hold my breath for it ever happening though.The pill for young women also increases risk of blood clots, that could have factored in with the deaths of some after the vaccine
I don't think I'm smarter than the doctors I've spoken to about this virus or my specialist either.
I reckon a few of our friends that have been posting here regularly that believe the official covid narrative are in this pro vaccine musical.
Alberta just announced that all Covid restrictions will be gone on 1 July. State of emergency lifted. No limits on weddings, funerals, sports etc. No advisories against non-essential travel. Calgary Stampede and other events set to go ahead.
Alberta had more cases today with 150 then Victoria has had all year in 120 so nice for you but not a reality we can live in
You seem to be suggesting Australia can do it differently to everybody else over the world and get away with it? I don't think we can. We can't even get the other states to relax a bit at the borders.
Yeh, I would have got the shot firstly because while I'm quite fit I'm immuno compromised and secondly, I have elderly relatives that if I can protect I will. In my seasonal work, I'm mingling with a lot of people. I've also had the REAL flu, if this virus is worse than that and I'm pretty sure it can be I'd rather not do it again if I can avoid it.
I'm not convinced there's as many asymptomatic or 'not sick!' people out there as claimed either. We've all felt like crapp and carried on as usual, some more likely to because nobody enjoys getting sticks shoved up their noses and having to do two weeks iso/quarantine. A lot of these asymptomatics are being caught up in mandatory testing as contacts and they're going to be a bit defensive when they test positive "Oh, but I felt great! I haven't even had a headache. I'm so shocked to be testing positive!"
We've seen quite a few prominent people catch it and it hit them hard, with the best treatment us plebs can't access it still flattened them. Peter Dutton disappeared for well over a month and when he did come back, he was trying hard to make it look like he wasn't still struggling for air.
I don't think I'm smarter than the doctors I've spoken to about this virus or my specialist either. Personally, I couldn't care less who gets the shot and who doesn't and if and when I decide I really can't do another Melbourne winter in rolling lockdowns, I can be out of here in under two hours.
Nothing is going to change in the way this thing is managed.