moomba
TheBrownDog
Reluctant? LOL. They've been far more forthcoming than any other team in releasing information. The facts are there were 6 positive players and coaches out for the Arsenal game plus a significant amount of the squad in isolation and positive cases in the U23 squad. Training off for the week - this call was actually made by health authorities, not the club itself unless you also believe they are in on the conspiracy. One of the factors also was the squad travelling down to London when the club was dealing with a potential outbreak. False positives do happen. Actual positives towards the end of an infection do happen regularly which come up as a negative on PCR swaps a few days later.
Compared with Newcastle who had a grand total of 3 positive cases. No training ground closure. No management with positive cases. Apparently no explanation required for you on that one.
You could do a little more to hide your bias.
Who is talking about conspiracy?
Just saying that it's fair enough for Liverpool to be asked to explain what happened.
It has nothing to do with Newcastle, they provided the information they were required to for the league to make a decision and there is no evidence that information was wrong.
It has nothing to do with positives amongst the coaching staff either. Totally irrelevant. For the third post in a row you've accused me.of bias. This has nothing to do with me and I had nothing to do with your game being called off.
False positives do happen. I think the chances is something like 1 in a 1000 and like I said I"ve come across it a couple of times at work over the past few years (average 1k staff across 4 sites)
A number of false positives at once just isn't realistic unless there is some structural flaws with the testing process.
I think it's fair enough for the league to understand what those flaws are.