News Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread III - L6ckdown

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
If this is true then I'm getting concerned that the more vocal lobby groups (parents who don't want to WFH and have their child home too and hospo) are getting all the bones thrown to them.

The idea that hundreds of kids from different families can all sit in a classroom together, but friends of mine who booked a little stay in a cabin in the dandenongs are too high risk, is pretty on the nose. If they're that concerned that they need to restrict movement, I think they need to treat it as such across the board rather than making some pretty high risk exceptions.

Doesn't affect my life too much either way.

At a guess I would say 3 to 4 million people live with a 25km radius of my home. That restriction makes no sense whatsoever.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not many people want the AZ, it’s more than hesitancy
The only reason I'd prefer the Pfizer is the 12 weeks between the AZ jabs compared to 3 or 4 weeks with Pfizer.

I went AZ.
 
How you feeling today? We all got the 1st AZ jab about 8 weeks ago at work. Most people were ok, I was a bit tired the next day but that was it. It paled in comparison to the effect contracting Covid19 had on one of my mates! My follow-up jab is in 3 weeks, few people here who have had it said there was no effect.
Still zero effects 3 days on.
 
At a guess I would say 3 to 4 million people live with a 25km radius of my home. That restriction makes no sense whatsoever.
It’s to keep metro people out of regional Victoria unless they have a good reason to travel.
 
It’s to keep metro people out of regional Victoria unless they have a good reason to travel.

I know what it's for but it still doesn't make any sense. Even the objective only barely passes the sniff test. It's alright for 5 million people in Melbourne metro to circulate among each other but a few hundred thousand going out of town for the long weekend would a disaster? It's bollocks.
 
"Sex on premises, brothels and sexually explicit venues: Open to a maximum of 100 people per venue, no more than 50 people indoors. Density quotient of 1 person per 4sqm applies" How does that work, just asking :)
 
2 people could be on the edge of their 4m2 and make it work....but mathematically it makes a threesome difficult .
"Sex on premises, brothels and sexually explicit venues: Open to a maximum of 100 people per venue, no more than 50 people indoors. Density quotient of 1 person per 4sqm applies" How does that work, just asking :)

On Pixel 4a using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

"Sex on premises, brothels and sexually explicit venues: Open to a maximum of 100 people per venue, no more than 50 people indoors. Density quotient of 1 person per 4sqm applies" How does that work, just asking :)



As Paul Newman once said;
" why go out and buy hamburgers when you can have steak at home " ?
 
As Paul Newman once said;
" why go out and buy hamburgers when you can have steak at home " ?

Or "why go out and get hot & spicy when you can have that plus the whole shebang at home"?

1623221228414.png
 
Idiots testing positive after going on a road trip through NSW and QLD for a week and a half, with symptoms since Wednesday, aren't going to help the inter state borders to open again.

Confirmed to be the result of another breach from Victorian hotel quarantine. That's one breach for roughly every 40 positive cases in Vic Hotel quarantine. One in 120 for NSW.
 
Idiots testing positive after going on a road trip through NSW and QLD for a week and a half, with symptoms since Wednesday, aren't going to help the inter state borders to open again.
They sound like a couple of Bright Sparks. :stern look
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top