News Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread V

Remove this Banner Ad

gokangas

Premium Platinum
Jan 16, 2004
36,934
25,839
Melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Storm - Victory
My neices just tested positive and my youngest two are now showing symptoms but have so far tested negative. My oldest ones have had their first jab and were meant to have their second jab in a week. Fingers crossed it passes quickly but looks like I'll be missing this week's game.
Spreading quicker than a West Coke training session. Hope you all are ok.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

DesertRoo

Brownlow Medallist
Feb 11, 2013
11,258
21,208
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Origins of Covid.
A confidentiality agreement shows potential coronavirus vaccine candidates were transferred from Moderna to the University of North Carolina in 2019, nineteen days prior to the emergence of the alleged Covid-19 causing virus in Wuhan, China.

And now further evidence suggests the American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company that has made billions through the sale of said experimental injection, is actually responsible for creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The confidentially agreement which can be viewed here states that providers ‘Moderna’ alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) agreed to tranfer ‘mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna to recipients ‘The Universisty of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on the 12th December 2019.
Found on page 105 of the agreement

The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019.
Recipient signatories found on page 107

The agreement was also signed by two representatives of the NIAID, one of whom was Amy F. Petrik PhD, a technology transfer specialist who signed the agreement on December 12th 2019 at 8:05 am. The other signatory was Barney Graham MD PhD, an investigator for the NIAID, however this signature was not dated.
NIAID signatories found on page 107

The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Councel. Both signautres were made on December 17th 2019.
Moderna signatories found on page 108

All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of “unknown cause”.

It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the alleged resultant disease dubbed COVID-19. So why was an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate developed by Moderna being transferred to the University of North Carolina on December 12th 2019?

The same Moderna that have had an mRNA coronavirus vaccine authorised for emergency use only in both the United Kingdom and United States to allegedly combat Covid-19.

What did Moderna know that we didn’t? In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine, and to be honest, the evidence suggests there hasn’t actually been a singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity throughout 2020, 2021, or 2022 either.

Could it have something to do with the fact that Moderna may actually be responsible for creating the Covid-19 virus?

On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19.

They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.

However, research shows that Moderna did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16th for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2,as well.

So in effect, Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid-19 its infectivity to humans by patented gain of function research as early as 2013, 6 years before the Wuhan outbreak took place. Not 3 years, as reported in the Mail and virally elsewhere.

The final codon completed inserted gene sequence, ‘CTCCTCGGCGGGCA’, patented by Moderna, does not exist in natural viruses and neither does the CGG coded Furin Cleavage site CCTCGGCGGGCACGT.

But they do exist naturally in bacteria and in humans and in cows and in plants. Viruses can invade bacteria and insert their genes into the them. But bacteria cannot insert their genes into viruses. Nature has had plenty of opportunity to put them into viruses and has refused to do so.

Therefore, the only way for bacterial DNA to end up in a virus is by human intervention. So the Covid-19 virus must have been man made.

We published two previous articles on this subject in March 2022 that contain much more scientific detail on the subject at hand. You can read Part One here, and Part Two here. Part Two contains the complete method of using the BLAST database for you to fact check this for yourself.
Part One
Part Two

So there you have it. All evidence points to the fact that the Covid-19 virus is man made. And now further evidence suggests Moderna is responsible for creating the virus. Which is most likely why they were able to produce a Coronavirus vaccine candidate before Covid-19 was even known to publicly exist, and it looks like Bill Gates may have even been in on the act.

Moderna confirmed in 2016 that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had granted them $20 million to support their “initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine”.

But Moderna also reveal that the framework agreement they made with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation could bring the total funding up to $100 million for “follow-on projects” that are proposed to and approved by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation up to 2022, and the terms of this agreement stipulate that Moderna are obliged to grant the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive licenses.

A Non-Exclusive Licence grants the licensee the right to use the intellectual property, but means that the licensor remains free to exploit the same intellectual property and to allow any number of other licensees to also exploit the same intellectual property.

Therefore under the terms of the agreement made with Moderna, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have now been granted a non-exclusive license to the Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injection, and are therefore profiting from its use.
 

blackshadow

Brownlow Medallist
Sep 24, 2007
27,084
41,755
Melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Team WADA
Origins of Covid.
A confidentiality agreement shows potential coronavirus vaccine candidates were transferred from Moderna to the University of North Carolina in 2019, nineteen days prior to the emergence of the alleged Covid-19 causing virus in Wuhan, China.

And now further evidence suggests the American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company that has made billions through the sale of said experimental injection, is actually responsible for creating the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The confidentially agreement which can be viewed here states that providers ‘Moderna’ alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) agreed to tranfer ‘mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna to recipients ‘The Universisty of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on the 12th December 2019.
Found on page 105 of the agreement

The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019.
Recipient signatories found on page 107

The agreement was also signed by two representatives of the NIAID, one of whom was Amy F. Petrik PhD, a technology transfer specialist who signed the agreement on December 12th 2019 at 8:05 am. The other signatory was Barney Graham MD PhD, an investigator for the NIAID, however this signature was not dated.
NIAID signatories found on page 107

The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Councel. Both signautres were made on December 17th 2019.
Moderna signatories found on page 108

All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of “unknown cause”.

It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the alleged resultant disease dubbed COVID-19. So why was an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate developed by Moderna being transferred to the University of North Carolina on December 12th 2019?

The same Moderna that have had an mRNA coronavirus vaccine authorised for emergency use only in both the United Kingdom and United States to allegedly combat Covid-19.

What did Moderna know that we didn’t? In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine, and to be honest, the evidence suggests there hasn’t actually been a singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity throughout 2020, 2021, or 2022 either.

Could it have something to do with the fact that Moderna may actually be responsible for creating the Covid-19 virus?

On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19.

They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.

However, research shows that Moderna did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16th for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2,as well.

So in effect, Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid-19 its infectivity to humans by patented gain of function research as early as 2013, 6 years before the Wuhan outbreak took place. Not 3 years, as reported in the Mail and virally elsewhere.

The final codon completed inserted gene sequence, ‘CTCCTCGGCGGGCA’, patented by Moderna, does not exist in natural viruses and neither does the CGG coded Furin Cleavage site CCTCGGCGGGCACGT.

But they do exist naturally in bacteria and in humans and in cows and in plants. Viruses can invade bacteria and insert their genes into the them. But bacteria cannot insert their genes into viruses. Nature has had plenty of opportunity to put them into viruses and has refused to do so.

Therefore, the only way for bacterial DNA to end up in a virus is by human intervention. So the Covid-19 virus must have been man made.

We published two previous articles on this subject in March 2022 that contain much more scientific detail on the subject at hand. You can read Part One here, and Part Two here. Part Two contains the complete method of using the BLAST database for you to fact check this for yourself.
Part One
Part Two

So there you have it. All evidence points to the fact that the Covid-19 virus is man made. And now further evidence suggests Moderna is responsible for creating the virus. Which is most likely why they were able to produce a Coronavirus vaccine candidate before Covid-19 was even known to publicly exist, and it looks like Bill Gates may have even been in on the act.

Moderna confirmed in 2016 that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had granted them $20 million to support their “initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine”.

But Moderna also reveal that the framework agreement they made with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation could bring the total funding up to $100 million for “follow-on projects” that are proposed to and approved by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation up to 2022, and the terms of this agreement stipulate that Moderna are obliged to grant the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive licenses.

A Non-Exclusive Licence grants the licensee the right to use the intellectual property, but means that the licensor remains free to exploit the same intellectual property and to allow any number of other licensees to also exploit the same intellectual property.

Therefore under the terms of the agreement made with Moderna, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have now been granted a non-exclusive license to the Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injection, and are therefore profiting from its use.
Unsubstantiated rubbish.

I hope the mods remove this and thread ban you.
 

Swallow_Wood

Club Legend
Jun 11, 2015
2,678
10,538
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Unsubstantiated rubbish that’s seen Moderna lose 70% of its stock value.
This 'story' breaks in late March yet the stock price has been dropping since September and its actually risen about 30% this month.

You might find that the reason for this plummet could be that Moderna does not have a distributed profile of works, leaving it tied primarily to the development of mRNA vaccines, which are now seen as not so profitable post-pandemic.



But yeah, logic and all that. Not so important.
 

DesertRoo

Brownlow Medallist
Feb 11, 2013
11,258
21,208
AFL Club
North Melbourne
This 'story' breaks in late March yet the stock price has been dropping since September and its actually risen about 30% this month.

You might find that the reason for this plummet could be that Moderna does not have a distributed profile of works, leaving it tied primarily to the development of mRNA vaccines, which are now seen as not so profitable post-pandemic.



But yeah, logic and all that. Not so important.

Your timeline is a bit off as the story has been circulating for months; this was submitted at the start of December.

podcast that explains moderna is going to zero.
 
Last edited:

Twinkletoes

Moderator
Jan 28, 2004
40,501
70,463
Tender Touch
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
MVFC, Storm, Everton, Socceroos
I have been so lucky so far. Covid all round me - neighbours, friends, workmates - but so far, negative.

Same here………..until two days ago when Mrs Toes was feeling crap so she tested, with a positive result. That meant the rest of us had to also test of course and whammo, I too was positive.

Both kids were negative.

Mrs Toes has been sick as a dog since and I’ve been mostly fine, but for a periodic cough and slight vertigo on day one. Four jabs FTW!

We escape iso again next Tuesday.
 

blackshadow

Brownlow Medallist
Sep 24, 2007
27,084
41,755
Melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Team WADA
Same here………..until two days ago when Mrs Toes was feeling crap so she tested, with a positive result. That meant the rest of us had to also test of course and whammo, I too was positive.

Both kids were negative.

Mrs Toes has been sick as a dog since and I’ve been mostly fine, but for a periodic cough and slight vertigo on day one. Four jabs FTW!

We escape iso again next Tuesday.


I hope you and Clan Toes are ok and don't go to stir crazy in iso.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

big_e

Existential crisis management consultant
Apr 28, 2008
9,303
27,627
Back Pocket
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Wycombe Wanderers
Same here………..until two days ago when Mrs Toes was feeling crap so she tested, with a positive result. That meant the rest of us had to also test of course and whammo, I too was positive.

Both kids were negative.

Mrs Toes has been sick as a dog since and I’ve been mostly fine, but for a periodic cough and slight vertigo on day one. Four jabs FTW!

We escape iso again next Tuesday.
Bummer.

At least it gives me the opportunity to say C U Next Tuesday, Toes!
 

koshari

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 24, 2011
16,661
24,304
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Here is hoping the covid can Bob up and provide us with another win.
 

ferball

Premium Platinum
Jul 24, 2015
31,744
60,437
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Tas - you've mentioned ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement) of COVID on and off for ages now.

Have you seen this? Its a pretty interesting summary of the role of ADE in severe Covid cases, especially from early in the pandemic. It might not apply to Omicron, I'm not sure but its worth having a look at. This guy has been covering this for a couple of days now. You'll find a link to the study in one of his earlier videos on it I think.

 

Soft Downhill Skier

2008-2010 wasn't me.
Sep 21, 2004
43,526
45,527
AFL Club
GWS
lol

1649467454430.png


Big lol

1649467479849.png
 

ferball

Premium Platinum
Jul 24, 2015
31,744
60,437
AFL Club
North Melbourne


So far Jed and Ollie Wines have had heart issues. Jed from the vaccine, Wines we don't know about cos he may have had covid as well. (Or just been that rare unlucky case.) Right now that's within the range of expected bad reactions based on post vaccination data from around the world (tho way higher than the range originally suggested by drug companies and the medical authorities in Australia and the US.)

If it happens again (once or more) that will be at least three cases of heart issues in a tiny population proportionally. That will be a strong signal and only idiots or jerks pushing an agenda would ignore it.
 

ferball

Premium Platinum
Jul 24, 2015
31,744
60,437
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Idiots or jerks, champ?
One or the other.

Keep in mind I said "if it happens again". It hasn't happened yet. If it does it will be a signal - information and how people react to it will determine whether or not they are, as you said - idiots, jerks or champs. The idiocy is understandable. Otherwise rational people have the same faith in this process that religious types have in their religions. Its hard for people to give up beliefs they are emotionally attached to and nearly everyone has an emotional attachment to this situation one way or another.

Again, keep in mind I said if... WE don't know what will happen yet. Hopefully nothing and no one else has an issue.

All we really know about this is the drug companies and CDC put out inaccurate information (ie misinformation) when they published their trial results and their expected rates of side effects.

Don't fall into the trap of being partisan about this.

People on this board are calling Jed an anti vaxxer even tho he had his first dose, then had a bad reaction to it then had a different vaccine as soon as it was available. And they are doing it simply because they got brainwashed into having a partisan position about this and won't let it go.
 

Soft Downhill Skier

2008-2010 wasn't me.
Sep 21, 2004
43,526
45,527
AFL Club
GWS
One or the other.

Keep in mind I said "if it happens again". It hasn't happened yet. If it does it will be a signal - information and how people react to it will determine whether or not they are, as you said - idiots, jerks or champs. The idiocy is understandable. Otherwise rational people have the same faith in this process that religious types have in their religions. Its hard for people to give up beliefs they are emotionally attached to and nearly everyone has an emotional attachment to this situation one way or another.

Again, keep in mind I said if... WE don't know what will happen yet. Hopefully nothing and no one else has an issue.

All we really know about this is the drug companies and CDC put out inaccurate information (ie misinformation) when they published their trial results and their expected rates of side effects.

Don't fall into the trap of being partisan about this.

People on this board are calling Jed an anti vaxxer even tho he had his first dose, then had a bad reaction to it then had a different vaccine as soon as it was available. And they are doing it simply because they got brainwashed into having a partisan position about this and won't let it go.
Hunter Biden.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad