Remove this Banner Ad

News Coronavirus Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gasometer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

with each solution come new problems, in the case of an accident who is culpable for example? the manufacturer, the software vendor? the owner?

I'd suggest that this problem would be sorted out after the first serious accident. Precedent set and argument sorted.


I don't have the reddit thread on hand but I recall reading a comparison on a million miles driven by humans vs by autonomous vehicles and the autonomous vehicles were safer.


So accidents will still happen, it'll be less than they do now.

I envisage subscription services for fleets of autonomous vehicles.

People will only own cars for leasure.
 
Very informative video today out of Melbourne Uni. At just over an hour long, I suspect most will decide against watching, but it brings together four experts; one who explains the modelling of "the curve" in lay terms, the head of the Doherty Institute (working on a vaccine / treatment), one of Australia's foremost economics professors, who assesses the expected economic impact and explains the mechanics of governments' stimulus packages (his Skype was playing up, though) and a historian who has worked on large scale historic disasters, including but not limited to pandemics.

 
I'd suggest that this problem would be sorted out after the first serious accident. Precedent set and argument sorted.


I don't have the reddit thread on hand but I recall reading a comparison on a million miles driven by humans vs by autonomous vehicles and the autonomous vehicles were safer.


So accidents will still happen, it'll be less than they do now.

I envisage subscription services for fleets of autonomous vehicles.

People will only own cars for leasure.
leasure and work i would say , cant see autonomous vehicles floating heavy earth-moving equipmet round, especially when they drive on and off roads that may not be on navigator databases like delivering plant to a new building site. agree as commuters on surveyed roads/routes its a lot more feasable.
 
So, your assumption that the States are overestimating numbers is wrong
I didn't say that.

I showed the CDC's own document which plainly states that the mortality 'coding' the have now put in place will, in their own words, lead to people being classed as dying from covid when covid is merely 'assumed' to be a 'contributing' factor.

You have provided zero evidence to contradict that.


View attachment 858942
Found about New Zealand, probably relevant.

The irony being that that graph is no less scientific than the primary school tier bullshit 'graphs' we are being shown on the news about the 'flatten the curve' mantra.

Most people's understanding of statistics is so utterly woeful that they will confuse cartoons featuring unlabeled axes with real science.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Very informative video today out of Melbourne Uni. At just over an hour long, I suspect most will decide against watching, but it brings together four experts; one who explains the modelling of "the curve" in lay terms, the head of the Doherty Institute (working on a vaccine / treatment), one of Australia's foremost economics professors, who assesses the expected economic impact and explains the mechanics of governments' stimulus packages (his Skype was playing up, though) and a historian who has worked on large scale historic disasters, including but not limited to pandemics.




 
I didn't say that.

I showed the CDC's own document which plainly states that the mortality 'coding' the have now put in place will, in their own words, lead to people being classed as dying from covid when covid is merely 'assumed' to be a 'contributing' factor.

You have provided zero evidence to contradict that.




The irony being that that graph is no less scientific than the primary school tier bullshit 'graphs' we are being shown on the news about the 'flatten the curve' mantra.

Most people's understanding of statistics is so utterly woeful that they will confuse cartoons featuring unlabeled axes with real science.

sorry, what exactly do you believe is the purpose of this conspiracy?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I don't think I have written about any conspiracies on this board.

The document I referred to earlier is from the CDC themselves.


Which part of this is too difficult for yourself and others to understand here?

Has the 24/7 onslaught of doom-news turned your brains to mush?

Right, so you just want to point out CDC’s method for classification?

Cool, thanks for the heads up, but I think it is pretty irrelevant in the context of a global pandemic 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom