Opinion Could MDB become our Priddis?

Remove this Banner Ad

He solely carried your midfield last year, however this year guys like Shuey, Gaff and Yeo have lifted and will take votes from him, especially Gaff. Wellingham has gone to a half back flank so he doesn't stink up your midfield anymore, whilst Chris Masten is still a waste of a pick 3.
Kennedy'll take some too. It's a midfielders medal unless your forward's kicking a bag.
 
Some of the commentary on this thread is unbelievable, have you even seen em both play without blinkers on?

Priddis is a genius apart from the obvious kicking. MDB doesnt have 1/10th the skillset that Priddis has at the coalface. If we are tapping to him 20% of the time we are in barney rubble...
 
Freo's mids are too biased towards winning the contest, and not that fast. De Boer feeding Barlow or Mundy doesn't really give you that much spread from the contest.

Agreed, although our midfield appears much more effective with him in there.

Possibly something to do with freeing players like Mundy and Hill to purer receiving roles?

Our opposition seem to think we have a weakness in ground ball gets. The weather certainly hasn't helped but that might be what MDB is being swung through for.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Agreed, although our midfield appears much more effective with him in there.

Possibly something to do with freeing players like Mundy and Hill to purer receiving roles?

Our opposition seem to think we have a weakness in ground ball gets. The weather certainly hasn't helped but that might be what MDB is being swung through for.
Really? They'd think wrong. Freo's midfield overwhelmingly wins the clearances.
 
Masten is good but needs consistency, jury is out on pick 3 still. Wellingham has been very good in defence this year. Other than that I agree.

Masten is an athlete, and a very good one since he was teen.

The problem is that he still doesn't realise that you need to work on your footy skills and can't just rely on your run. The pick 3 will potentially ruin him, as he bought into the crap he is a star since 1st year.
 
Weller and Blakely I don't think will be ready in 2015.
Agree. Although that's a brave opinion to voice around here at the moment. Brace for impact... :eek:

Steer clear of the preview/selection threads with that one, you'll never make it out of there alive! :$
 
Agree. Although that's a brave opinion to voice around here at the moment. Brace for impact... :eek:

Steer clear of the preview/selection threads with that one, you'll never make it out of there alive! :$

Ha ha. Bit like that. People seem to forget the step from WAFL to AFL is massive, and exponentially more for players that might apply their trade in the midfield. The pace of the game in all aspects and the physicality, let alone the mental toughness required, massive jump.

Having said that, with a full pre-season, depending on circumstances. I wouldn't write either off having a game or two in 2016. I would hope we'd get a sneak peak at them at some point. But as regulars, not likely.
 
Ha ha. Bit like that. People seem to forget the step from WAFL to AFL is massive, and exponentially more for players that might apply their trade in the midfield. The pace of the game in all aspects and the physicality, let alone the mental toughness required, massive jump.

Having said that, with a full pre-season, depending on circumstances. I wouldn't write either off having a game or two in 2016. I would hope we'd get a sneak peak at them at some point. But as regulars, not likely.
Agreed. I'm all for re-assessing bringing them in come 2016 with another pre-season under their belt, but as you've said and I've argued til my fingers are sore, they are not ready yet and a full on flag tilt isn't the time to blood youth for the sake of it.

Thought MDB was solid on the weekend. Will have trouble keeping his spot next year I'd say, same with Subes.
 
Last edited:
Our game is built on inside grunt and physicality. When we get lured into an outside game (Richmond) we aren't quite as good. Our outside midfielders get shown up. We added Sheridan to the mix to try and right that weakness, I think he's played 2 good games for the year. Last week and round 1. Hopefully he continues to grow.

Our advantage lies in our size around the ball, DeBoer has attributes consistent with our known advantage. He's big, tough and lays a world of pain against the opposition. He lacks finesse and gives away the odd free kick.

The benefit of having him in the team is he continues to press our advantage when our stars are resting (Fyfe, Mundy, Barlow). Opposition midfielders don't get respite from a tough inside game when The big 3 are elsewhere. Given footy is a weight of numbers game, what he brings to the table is worth having. His centre clearance work in the last quarter against Brisbane was enough to convince me.
 
Really? They'd think wrong. Freo's midfield overwhelmingly wins the clearances.
We win the clearances when we win the taps. Lost the clearances on the weekend. We tend to be good in structured situations where we have the Sandilands advantage but around the ground we still struggle to win our own ball back sometimes. Not all the time mind you just sometimes.
 
We win the clearances when we win the taps. Lost the clearances on the weekend. We tend to be good in structured situations where we have the Sandilands advantage but around the ground we still struggle to win our own ball back sometimes. Not all the time mind you just sometimes.
Sort of contradicts your initial point. The weekend was De Boer's first full game in the middle.
 
Taberner went off fairly early and other times De Boer has been subbed on he hasn't gone into the middle. Three clearances is the most De Boer has won for the year.

Freo not only wins the clearances overwhelmingly but has the best clearance midfielder in the game. People saying the midfield needs a Priddis type of player are forgetting it has the best clearance winner in the league. Why would you take Fyfe out of there and replace him with a less effective player?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Sort of contradicts your initial point. The weekend was De Boer's first full game in the middle.

de Boer had about half a game actually and still managed to snare 11 possessions. He's way underrated IMO and the pity is he has such limited opportunity with being sub most weeks.
 
de Boer had about half a game actually and still managed to snare 11 possessions. He's way underrated IMO and the pity is he has such limited opportunity with being sub most weeks.

And off my vague memory only went into the middle (centre bounces in particular) in the last quarter. He was integral, though not exclusively so of course, to us dominating those early stages of the last 1/4 I thought.
 
Agree. Although that's a brave opinion to voice around here at the moment. Brace for impact... :eek:

Steer clear of the preview/selection threads with that one, you'll never make it out of there alive! :$

Blakely is going to be the answer for that extractor position. Right now MdB is doing it when he comes on but IMO MickyB is being wasted, not playing it.
Mick immediately getting clearances when in the centre bounce in the last qtr against Brisbane.
 
Blakely is going to be the answer for that extractor position. Right now MdB is doing it when he comes on but IMO MickyB is being wasted, not playing it.
Mick immediately getting clearances when in the centre bounce in the last qtr against Brisbane.
Yeah I agree. Although not this year. Still too many handballs to kicks, means he is winning it but not getting enough separation once he has it. This will come with another pre-season and with a year in the system under his belt, he should be able to make the step up to senior level.

Don't understand why Barlow is being played as a high half forward at the expense of MDB in there, needs to be switched back IMO. Belongs at the clearances, hence his lowered output over the season. At his best in and under in the middle, extracting and handing off to Fyfe, Mundy, Hill et al.
 
I was reasonably impressed with MDB once he was substituted into the contest.We all know he's an incredibly tough,fearless footballer which is a pretty good pre-requisite playing the extractor( Priddis) role.
We all know his kicking is his glaring weakness, but if MDB just plays that tough inside gig his kicking deficiency is some what diluted.

I could see Fyfe being able to spend a bit more time resting forward if MDB played more of the extracting role.

Personally,I'd rather have MDB given a full game over Suban.

Thoughts.

He just needs to learn the art of quick handballing, one thing i can say is he will put his body on the line for sure and can be great defensive work against opposition attacking midfielders but if his role is to get the ball he needs quick handballs which he is not yet 100% mastered.
 
Taberner went off fairly early and other times De Boer has been subbed on he hasn't gone into the middle. Three clearances is the most De Boer has won for the year.

Freo not only wins the clearances overwhelmingly but has the best clearance midfielder in the game. People saying the midfield needs a Priddis type of player are forgetting it has the best clearance winner in the league. Why would you take Fyfe out of there and replace him with a less effective player?
The problem is the ball goes forward and nobody other than Walters can kick a goal at the moment, so it rebounds and goes back the other way. If another mid, who may not be as effective as Fyfe but who can still extract the ball enough to get it forward as much or more than the opposition, to Fyfe who can pluck balls out of the sky and isn't too bad in front of the sticks, then in terms of team balance, the latter is a better option than the former.
 
de Boer had about half a game actually and still managed to snare 11 possessions. He's way underrated IMO and the pity is he has such limited opportunity with being sub most weeks.

He also had 5 clangers in his 11 possessions and a disposal efficiency of 45.5%. This continues to be a massive knock on MDB. I thought he panic hack kicked a few times when he was in space after a handball receive. Certainly can't question his effort but................ it seems to me that we know what we're going to get. Suban has moved ahead of him because of his kicking. His inside game and ability to get to the contest has certainly improved this year. I hope Sutcliffe comes back in or we give Tendai another crack.
 
He also had 5 clangers in his 11 possessions and a disposal efficiency of 45.5%. This continues to be a massive knock on MDB. I thought he panic hack kicked a few times when he was in space after a handball receive. Certainly can't question his effort but................ it seems to me that we know what we're going to get. Suban has moved ahead of him because of his kicking. His inside game and ability to get to the contest has certainly improved this year. I hope Sutcliffe comes back in or we give Tendai another crack.

Fyfe had DE of 33% on the weekend. Ball was also greasy, assume the boys were under wet weather football directions to get the ball moving forward.
 
Sort of contradicts your initial point. The weekend was De Boer's first full game in the middle.
I don't think so. The OP was about how De Boer looks best in the centre and it was my view that we played our best football against Brisbane when De Boer was in there.

I'm just thinking what it was about throwing a limited but solid extractor in to the middle that freed up our ball movement and clearance work in the last. Was it just Brisbane fatigue or did our mids not play particularly well to that point? Fyfe can't take it on the move every bounce, so we need other options. Maybe there is something that De Boer does well that frees up some of our other players etc.
 
Just checked stats and I was wrong - 41% time on ground. Also 6 tackles. So reasonable to assume his stats would've at least doubled if full game. Freo kicked seven goals in final quarter due in no small part IMHO to de Boer's clearance work in middle.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top