Gralin
Super Moderator
- Moderator
- #3,351
Ok first of all what is wrong with outlining the plan in advance.I feel like we've already gone through this.
You're upset with him for not outlining the next steps without them actually being ready to be taken, just like he did not do today, which is the very reason he's been reluctant to commit to them before time. I can understand why he won't commit to the steps ahead of time, when so many people are already prepared to do as they please.
Today I read people complaining that we are under the 5 case average, when he's said for weeks that it's not just pure numbers, but the stories behind those numbers. We can't have unknown cases in large numbers, and this Preston outbreak puts that at risk.
Anyone that was paying attention to the Preston outbreak should have been well aware that any announcement of a rollback of restrictions was going to hinge on how quickly they could define and act on the cases in that region of Melbourne.
I don't mean dates times etc but the actual plan
What's wrong with giving people some clarity about what they are actually working towards and what they can expect to be allowed.
They actually said today that if we were already open they wouldn't close down for this outbreak so why isn't it safe to talk about what's coming?
Also why is it not ok to be upset about where we are at? Why does being upset automatically make points invalid?
He can be a s**t communicator and still be taking the right course of action. One issue doesn't impact the other.
How he goes about it matters, whether he's seen as trustworthy matters. Whether he and his government can communicate the plan matters.