http://www.watoday.com.au/sport/cox-in-doubt-for-hawks-clash-20090622-ctgc.html
Hmmm.
Maybe it's a good thing? He hasn't seemed quite right for a while now.
Hmmm.
Maybe it's a good thing? He hasn't seemed quite right for a while now.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Cox in doubt
- Thread starter shoe
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Ochre
Premium Platinum
coxys been in doubt every week since the derby last year
Cox's longevity has to be made a high priority. If that means we go in with an understrength ruck division this year so be it.
Thats true theres a story every second week about him being injured and in doubt. Seaby and Naita will be able to handle the ruck against Hawthorn anyway.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
kane249
Wibble
- Oct 27, 2006
- 54,797
- 76,529
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
Seaby? ugggghhh i'd rather Lynch and Naita
- Banned
- #6
This is a high risk game. Cox out, Seaby in.
We must look after Cox's long term fitness at all costs.
We must look after Cox's long term fitness at all costs.
Ochre
Premium Platinum
This is a high risk game. Cox out, Seaby in.
We must look after Cox's long term fitness at all costs.
give him the rest of the year off?
Level_Headed
Team Captain
If Cox is even slightly injured i reckon we give Seaby some time at AFL level. It has the benefit of potentially adding to Cox's longevity as well as maybe possibly adding to Seaby's trade value (if he turns in a few good performances.)
- Banned
- #9
On a serious note, no. On an equally serious note, if he is injured we should rest him. The priority should be managing his injuring over playing him to win a game. I wouldn't want to play him only to get a serious injury and miss a pre-season or somthing in 2010.
Good chance to throw Naita into the deep end too. Probably with seaby.
kane249
Wibble
- Oct 27, 2006
- 54,797
- 76,529
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
The only trade Seaby's in danger of next year is getting traded from West Perth to another WAFL club, he's as good as finished at AFL level
- Banned
- #13
Get the referals ready, call the surgeons, the heavy armour is coming!
- Sep 21, 2004
- 44,119
- 35,555
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Norwood & Liverpool.
Seaby would smash Hawthorns rucks.
They have no one.
Taylor, Renouf, Campbell??? who???
Seabs and NicNat and give Coxy a week off - even though it means my DreamTeam dies
They have no one.
Taylor, Renouf, Campbell??? who???
Seabs and NicNat and give Coxy a week off - even though it means my DreamTeam dies
Exactly
The last thing we want is him playing on with a foot / stress fracture or whatever. Just refer to Croad and Matty Eagan who kept on playing on, now they look like missing an entire season of footy.
Agree we play Seaby and NickNat.....especially Seaby.
With clubs such as Brisbane, Essendon, Crows and even the Pies having their ruck divisions stretched severely this season I can see more clubs being interested in Seaby this trade / draft period.
Playing Ryder and Brennan types as a first ruck is how you shorten the careers of these guys.
Ochre
Premium Platinum
no, its "list management"
there's a fine line!
Seaby played well last time, deserves a game.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Does this mean we'll see more of NicNat in the ruck and on ball?
Yay!
He hardly trained a couple of weeks ago (can't remember who it was against) but he still played.
Yay!
He hardly trained a couple of weeks ago (can't remember who it was against) but he still played.
swannies
Brownlow Medallist
10k Posts
Armchair Endzone Minor Comp Winner
Armchair Endzone Participant
Did we look better when Naita was in the ruck against Richmond? I happen to agree with Walls (no surprise there I know
) but we were far more dangerous when Naita was around the ball. Could this simply be a test against a weaker ruck division, or could it be the beginning of the end for Cox?
(I'm only joking if you couldn't tell).
Did we look better when Naita was in the ruck against Richmond? I happen to agree with Walls (no surprise there I know
Could this simply be a test against a weaker ruck division, or could it be the beginning of the end for Cox?
Naita rucking most of a game would be interesting...
Similar threads
