Ochre
Premium Platinum
there goes my respect for you
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Cox in doubt
- Thread starter shoe
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
there goes my respect for you
Snooperclyde
Club Legend
Yes you would but we can't worry about hurting players feelings.
If we play Seaby then we are down to 17 players on the ground, except when the ball is bounced.
I suspect this may have been an issue for Coxy for a couple of weeks. There was something suspicious with Cockie not being elevated strait away and maybe Will Sullivan might get promoted. If you overlook his last game (in the wet) then he has been playing well. If that happens then Cockie is the one to feel sorry for.
What directive? It's funny that people entertain the idea Seaby is not good enough for us but would be good enough elsewhere.cat21 said:
Big slow ruckmen are on the way out.
I'd be surprised if Sullivan gets a run, based on his form so far this season. Sure, last week was wet so it was hard for him, but prior to that, he was playing OK WAFL footy. Prior to last week, he was only just starting to get a few marks around the ground and had been beaten on several occassions by opposition ruckmen.
If it is wet this weekend, I wouldn't be surprised to see us go in without a second ruckman and use NN as no.1 ruck and have Lynch as the back up.
If it is wet this weekend, I wouldn't be surprised to see us go in without a second ruckman and use NN as no.1 ruck and have Lynch as the back up.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Might be without Hunter, Embley and Cox this weekend.
In goes Butler, Seaby and Houlihan for those guys I rekon.
In goes Butler, Seaby and Houlihan for those guys I rekon.
- May 26, 2006
- 4,486
- 561
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- WCW, Patriots, Knicks
Bring Seaby in.
Cant expect Naita to spend the amount of time in the ruck as Cox does, still need to ease him in. Lynch really needs to stay up forward where he is needed to give some structure. This seems like the perfect chance to give Seabs another shot
Cant expect Naita to spend the amount of time in the ruck as Cox does, still need to ease him in. Lynch really needs to stay up forward where he is needed to give some structure. This seems like the perfect chance to give Seabs another shot
Seaby would smash Hawthorns rucks.
They have no one.
Taylor, Renouf, Campbell??? who???
Seabs and NicNat and give Coxy a week off - even though it means my DreamTeam dies
Campbell has had to play back al year due to not having KPP...
Between Cambo and Tails last year they were 4th in hit-outs to advantage in the league....so don't talk rubbish about Seaby...you know he can't play..hence his long career playing at WAFL level....
Nick Nat and Q-stick would be your best option
I disagree Seaby + Nat is a better option.
Also.. the amount of quotes on your own board about how poor your ruck division is this year ... its astonishing that you would come here to defend them.
Also.. the amount of quotes on your own board about how poor your ruck division is this year ... its astonishing that you would come here to defend them.
- Banned
- #35
Against Simon Taylor??. Just throw Cockie in there and let Taylor ruck against himself. He would still lose. That bloke makes Kepler Bradley look like Usain Bolt
How do you fix a sore Cox?
At AMI
What do you call a Cox in doubt?
Erectile Dysfunction
How do you fix a sore Cox?
At AMI
What do you call a Cox in doubt?
Erectile Dysfunction
- Apr 28, 2008
- 13,711
- 10,354
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Arsenal Kilmarnock
Yeah, give him a miss against the dee's as well, or as long as is needed.
Seaby has shown in the past he can stand up when without Cox. Just 50/50 duties with Naita between ruck/forward. Both occasionally dangerous in attack.
Lynch is a back-up if the partnership is no good, ie. if we need a change to win in the last quarter.
Seaby has shown in the past he can stand up when without Cox. Just 50/50 duties with Naita between ruck/forward. Both occasionally dangerous in attack.
Lynch is a back-up if the partnership is no good, ie. if we need a change to win in the last quarter.
correct
this year, and again I reiterate...for those hard of hearing , Campbell has been playing at FB or CHB all year, he is our No.1 ruckmen from last year...hence the problem this year in the ruck so far, if Gilham plays this weekend...Campbell will go into the ruck and the structure from when we last played will be totally different...
thats quite funny Embers
His tap work isn't too bad, it is more of his decision making if he gets the footy which hurts...
Taylor vs Seaby = Shake hands and call it a draw
thats quite funny Embers
His tap work isn't too bad, it is more of his decision making if he gets the footy which hurts...
Taylor vs Seaby = Shake hands and call it a draw
Would rather see McGlynn v Lecras in the ruck!
- Banned
- #40
thats quite funny Embers
His tap work isn't too bad, it is more of his decision making if he gets the footy which hurts...
Taylor vs Seaby = Shake hands and call it a draw
His tap work is deplorable. Sewell and Mitchell just make it look half decent. If he was rucking for us he would look like a even bigger goose then he already does. Words cant explain how bad I think he is.
Taylor vs Leigh Brown = Shake hands and call it a Leigh Brown unanimous point decision victory
Im sorry hes just that bad. I almost refuse to go to the game as a protest. If he gets paid to go to the game than so should I.
Strider83
Senior List
Buy Nicnat as backup.
jeezus that is scathing...though consistant ...trust me I think you did a good job of explaining how bad you think he is....
If he is that bad, then he obviously rates up there with Dizzy O'Connell
larrikin
Moderator
- Moderator
- #43
Article on Naitanui being ready to take the lead role
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,25678988-5018851,00.html
Talks a bit about Seaby still being a required player too
Fletcher fans will love this last bit
EDIT - Shit just realised I'm supposed to be his sponsor
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,25678988-5018851,00.html
Talks a bit about Seaby still being a required player too
Fletcher fans will love this last bit
EDIT - Shit just realised I'm supposed to be his sponsor
At the beginning of the year, Woosha said Fletcher has an "important role" to play in the team. He's now no longer required.
I'd be worried if I were Seaby, given he has a "valuable role" in the team.
I'd be worried if I were Seaby, given he has a "valuable role" in the team.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Alphanumeric
Premiership Player
Playing Seaby might add something to his trade value.
- Banned
- #47
Mark Seaby is past his use by date.
Its like drinking milk thats gone off and you continue drinking it, cause theres nothing else to drink.
Would you still drink it. NO you wouldn't even consider it.
So why is Seaby still being mention here, we don't need milk that bad.
Lets just put Lynch and Nic nat in the ruck.
Geez theres allot of harshness for Seaby here.
I feel sorry for the guy really, I hope that he pulls finger out gets some posessions, wins the tap count and kicks a few goals because I would like to see him at another club next year (if thats what he wants) and the way he is going now no-one is going to want him.
I feel sorry for the guy really, I hope that he pulls finger out gets some posessions, wins the tap count and kicks a few goals because I would like to see him at another club next year (if thats what he wants) and the way he is going now no-one is going to want him.
Similar threads
