- May 2, 2011
- 13,837
- 7,030
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, CDFC, MUFC, Redbacks
Looking like another draw at this rate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I'm not so sure. The Poms have already bowled more than 150 overs, and they're predicting 40C in Sydney tomorrow, so the visitors will be well be well and truly buggered by the time Smith declares after lunch tomorrow.Looking like another draw at this rate.
The great thing about Kerry O'Keffe is that KG Cunningham hates his guts. On that basis alone he cannot be all bad. Oh, and that frog joke...
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...p/news-story/82a926c78e84a7f5fb12666429dca922The Australian selectors have been roundly praised for masterminding the return of the Ashes. And rightly so. Picking Tim Paine and Shaun Marsh were courageous calls, minister. “Do you think that’s wise, sir?” Dad’s Army’s Sergeant Wilson might have counselled Trevor Hohns on parachuting Paine into the XI. Wise? Inspired, more like. Yesterday Paine went past Brad Haddin’s 22 dismissals for an Ashes series on home soil (set in 2013-14). He’s made handy runs at No 7 but more importantly, he’s gloved the ball beautifully. And spared the threat of the moving new ball at the top of the innings, Marsh has been Australia’s bulwark in the middle order. The selectors were pilloried at the start of the summer: now they should be praised in equal measure. Paine’s elevation is possibly the greatest Australian selection since Steve Smith made his debut in 2010.
Which brings us to a pertinent point. The selectors are riding high and can take full credit for the emphatic retention of the Ashes, such has been the impact of Paine and the elder Marsh. But they can’t take credit for the XI as a whole. Barring Mitchell Marsh and Cameron Bancroft, the whole team was first picked by the Andrew Hilditch selection panel. The James Sutherland-led regime loves to talk about new eras, injections of youth and suchlike, but the bulk of this team debuted seven years ago.
It followed Hilditch and Jamie Cox resigning — or not reapplying in Hilditch’s case — after the Argus review to allow their successors to chart their own path. However, the path has wound its way back to circa 2011. Because the sum total of Test stars unearthed since that time is … zero. David Warner perhaps qualifies as a post-Hilditch pick, given he was handed his Test cap in the first team selected by John Inverarity’s panel in 2011. But Warner had been in the one-day and T20 XI for almost two years before that. The old, often maligned, panel is also responsible for elevating the youngest player in the current XI, Pat Cummins. Mitchell Starc, James Pattinson (then both 20) and Josh Hazlewood (19) played one-dayers during the Hilditch years but all three were on the cusp of Test careers. Perhaps the old panel’s greatest success — other than picking the captain of course — is Nathan Lyon, catapulted into the Test side on the recommendation of Kim Hughes and Darren Berry. So the previous panel is responsible for Australia’s greatest offspinner and its best batsman since Bradman.
It’s not that the various panels under Inverarity, Rod Marsh and now Trevor Hohns haven’t reached for the sky.Their faith in Mitchell Marsh was repaid in Perth before the batsman disbursed a bonus dividend in Melbourne.
They speculated with Ashton Agar. They dabbled with Alex Doolan. They gambled on Joe Burns. And last summer they introduced Matt Renshaw, Peter Handscomb and Nic Maddinson for the third Test against South Africa. When Australia won that match, all the talk was about a new golden era.But all three are gone, and the selectors’ latest batting pick, Cameron Bancroft, appears headed for the same fate.........
Could this game be all over tonight?!?
Good story in the Oz yesterday about how the Andrew Hilditch led selection panel picked a whole lot of kids in 2009-2011 for both Tests and ODI's when we were struggling against England, India and South Africa at Test cricket and ODI's, but beating or drawing with everyone else, the selectors were bagged CA commissions the Argus report which recommends big changes and Hilditch decides not to reapply for chairman of selectors job.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...p/news-story/82a926c78e84a7f5fb12666429dca922
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...p/news-story/82a926c78e84a7f5fb12666429dca922
View attachment 449466
It's an interesting one, Hilditch was a pretty terrible communicator and made a meal of public relations during his time in the role but unquestionably oversaw some very talented and now successful cricketers introduction to test cricket. Some of the selections he presided over and attempted to justify were Jackie Chan WTF level, but it's a bloody tough role and it's one of those jobs where everyone thinks they can do better!
Andrew Hilditch is Bobby Simpson's son in law and part of the cricket establishment whereas a couple of his fellow selectors were not.
You are right. I thought I could do better at the start of this series and would not have picked Shaun Marsh, Tim Paine or Mitchell Marsh. These guys have all met the challenge and proved me wrong. All power to the selectors this time around. About the only thing they got wrong was picking Jackson Bird who bowls fast and straight, a little too straight.
UpdatedRoot has gone to hospital with dehydration, & isn’t out in the middle. Hope he pulls through.
Edit: he’s arrived back at the ground.