Remove this Banner Ad

Cricket Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So should yourself, your knowledge of cricket is as bad as your footy knowledge.

tenor.gif
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The gnome would prefer Agar to Holland. But Holland takes wickets, whereas Agar balls are sent to the pickets.

Siddle bowled well in T2.

Mitch 'the mug' was made vc to prevent the nong being dropped. The duffers are selected for reasons more to do with nepotism and that Oz cricket is run by a cabal of dolts.
 
Agar for Holland is a no brainer.
M Marsh is VC, no way they are dropping him.
S Marsh has enough recent runs to hold his spot.
Siddle should be left out.

So your idea is to leave out Siddle who was our best quick? I'm not a Siddle fan but he's not being dropped...and why we need yet another left arm finger spinner is beyond me. Exactly how many off spinners do we need in 1 side?

Unfortunately the Marsh duds won't be dropped.
 
So your idea is to leave out Siddle who was our best quick? I'm not a Siddle fan but he's not being dropped...and why we need yet another left arm finger spinner is beyond me. Exactly how many off spinners do we need in 1 side?

Unfortunately the Marsh duds won't be dropped.

When the opposition goes into the game to block their way to 500 in 3 days, he is just the type of bowler that they would love to face. Does nothing with the ball and bowls half rat power throw downs.

Are you Bedford's son? You come up with the same nonsensical analysis.
 
When the opposition goes into the game to block their way to 500 in 3 days, he is just the type of bowler that they would love to face. Does nothing with the ball and bowls half rat power throw downs.

Are you Bedford's son? You come up with the same nonsensical analysis.
You've insulted me one time too many ! by the way when did you become a cricket expert , I presume you didn't play that as well.
 
When the opposition goes into the game to block their way to 500 in 3 days, he is just the type of bowler that they would love to face. Does nothing with the ball and bowls half rat power throw downs.

Are you Bedford's son? You come up with the same nonsensical analysis.

If any quick deserves to be dropped after that test, it isn't Siddle. Starc bowled absolute utter trash. Line and length gets wickets over there, Abbas for Pakistan does that as well.
 
You've insulted me one time too many ! by the way when did you become a cricket expert , I presume you didn't play that as well.

I was so jelly of your fabulous reserve grade Aussie Rules career, now I'm even more jelly of your second XI cricket career.
If telling people they're posting in the wrong thread on an internet forum was a sport you might make it to the top level in something.
Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him Horatio.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If any quick deserves to be dropped after that test, it isn't Siddle. Starc bowled absolute utter trash. Line and length gets wickets over there, Abbas for Pakistan does that as well.

Yes, drop Starc and keep Siddle. :rolleyes:

Thanks Bedford Jnr.
 
Hazelwood should be fit for tests at home.


Cummins?

I think Siddle is a honest toiler has done well with his career and will bowl all day, but he is not threatening anymore, just let him bowl for Victoria
 
Cummins?

I think Siddle is a honest toiler has done well with his career and will bowl all day, but he is not threatening anymore, just let him bowl for Victoria

Given his injury history they're wisely giving him a bit more time than Hazelwood.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Some gems there , didn't Wrigglesworth come from Carlton


No idea, didnt know that much

Mick Farrell used to live over the road from me when he first got near the Tassie team, was surprised because i was like 8 and he wasnt much chop in street cricket.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Cricket Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top