don’t you know?
I know he has received no medical advice to not take the vaccine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
don’t you know?
* whether
** That’s a new speed record for going the disingenuous strawman
What about the FDA..something about needing 55 years to present the data on the Pfizer vaccine..hmm
whats the problem with the points raised in the article - why not address that instead of attacking the organisation reporting this. If it is 55 years they are wanting to hold out on that is outrageous and can only fuel the fire of those questioning whyAh yes that bastion of unbias reporting mediaite...
whats the problem with the points raised in the article - why not address that instead of attacking the organisation reporting this. If it is 55 years they are wanting to hold out on that is outrageous and can only fuel the fire of those questioning why
Petitioner asks for something ridiculous and claims 'coverup' when denied."The FDA office that would need to do the work has ten employees, including two trainees, and is currently processing about 400 FOIA requests. It also says the process is time-consuming as each page must be reviewed "line-by-line" and some information exempt from FOIA would need to be redacted.
The FDA said the standard would be to release 500 pages per month on a rolling basis — 6,000 pages per year. Divide 329,000 by 6,000 and the result is 54.83 years.
At that pace, the request wouldn't be fully answered until 2076.
"Courts do not waiver from the standard 500 page per month processing rate even when a FOIA request would take years to process," the FDA said.
um yep..surePetitioner asks for something ridiculous and claims 'coverup' when denied.
I know he has received no medical advice to not take the vaccine.
He’s a fit adult, under the age of 60, without serious co-morbidities; that puts his risk at near zero.
there is no “medical advice”, not even where you get yours from, that says he is at any meaningful risk.
it’s his decision. The consequences are his to bear.
What a nut. The numerous players collapsing around the world post vaccination are from heat exhaustion.
Yeah I was being sarcastic. Some athletes are having their careers ruined with heart damage from the vaccine. AFL should have never mandated it. I'm glad we had a board with some integrity standing up for our players.my sister, who didn’t finish year 9 and was a meth addict for 5 years, tells me it’s the vax
i can’t wait til the World Cup is played in Qatar and there’s a spate of vax reactions, not due to the heat
Yep, I'd be interested to know how he got on the members ballot though
Somehow an uneventful, normal preseason turns into drama
fu** off Takos
No he doesn't, he said he wanted to get one.He also had a medical exemption which was rejected by the club.
Read that again. He had a medical exemption. And the Crows rejected it. Because they’re so pro-science, you see.
”Trust the experts” which happen to be all the people on the Crows board of directors and not Takos’ cardiologist, apparently?
Somehow an uneventful, normal preseason turns into drama
fu** off Takos
That's true!I feel like this doesn't even register on the scale of Adelaide preseason drama.
No he doesn't, he said he wanted to get one.
He's an idiot.