- Joined
- Oct 4, 2004
- Posts
- 4,713
- Reaction score
- 557
- Location
- Somewhere not suspicious
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Sweet.
47, 63 and 79 it is.
I see what you did there.
I should be saying higher.
Or not relying on Adelaide supporters to understand me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Sweet.
47, 63 and 79 it is.
That is why I would be amazed if we end up trading with The Crows, the supporters have the club running scared and that is why they dont trade players, I can not recall any player trades of note for many years from the Crows.
You're hardly talking about 'good' players there, you've got a guy rated as one of the best young mids in the comp, a guy who is one of the best young forwards in the comp (with immense potential), a guy who is rated as one of the best KPPs in the comp (in his first full year of AFL footy), a guy who came second in the Rising Star, a guy who kicked 43 goals on a HFF in 16 games (and doesn't want to leave), a guy who is already spoken about as a potential Club Captain, and a kid who has come from basketball, dominated the SANFL, and now looks like he'll be a gun in the AFL.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Too late, no takesiez backsiez!I see what you did there.
I should be saying higher.
Or not relying on Adelaide supporters to understand me.
... we aren't desperate for them, and I can't see us giving away our best young players to get them.

Adelaide unproven players have massive potential... but Carlton provem (and still very young) and in Jacobs situation... improving out of side... they are only good... what don't you understand???Thank you for proving my point
Do you have any idea what a decent first ruck costs? Especially one that young?
You think you have all these stars but they've mostly done nothing and shown very little.
You just lost your stars (McLeod, Edwards, Goodwin) that's why you need guys like Walker and Jacobs and you will have to give up quality to get them.
Yeah this is what I'm realising. Adelaide players will be traded on potential (Didak went from averaging 10 disposals per game in 2003 to AA in 2010 so all Crows young players will do the same) while Jacobs sits behind Kreuzer and Warnock so he's just a backup.Adelaide unproven players have massive potential... but Carlton provem (and still very young) and in Jacobs situation... improving out of side... they are only good... what don't you understand???
Thank you for proving my point![]()
Do you have any idea what a decent first ruck costs? Especially one that young?

Again, assuming he wants to leave, then I'd think you'll get slightly under value, where as if he was ok there, but we were desperate to pry him out, we'd have to overpay.and unless you've been living under a rock, pick 14 is closer to pick 22 in this draft........oh hang on![]()
King_Elvis is more King_Pelvis
"Goddess"

When is trade week? I can't take too much more of this.
Probably similar to what you paid for Warnock. Though Warnock has a much higher roof and is obviously considered a better ruck by Carlton people.Do you have any idea what a decent first ruck costs? Especially one that young?
How does the stuff you bolded prove your point?
Dangerfield isn't considered one of the best young mids in the comp?
Davis isn't considered one of the best young KPPs in the comp?
Sloane hasn't been mentioned repeatedly by Adelaide Coaching and Playing Staff as a potential Club Captain?
Cameron Wood for #14 - overpaid; bust.
Mummy for #28 - good trade, has come on massively this year.
What're the other comparable trades?
I think Jacobs is worth #20-#25 in normal circumstances; with his desire to leave, we could possibly get him a little cheaper.
Disagree with that rating?
How does the stuff you bolded prove your point?
Dangerfield isn't considered one of the best young mids in the comp?
Davis isn't considered one of the best young KPPs in the comp?
Sloane hasn't been mentioned repeatedly by Adelaide Coaching and Playing Staff as a potential Club Captain?
Cameron Wood for #14 - overpaid; bust.
Mummy for #28 - good trade, has come on massively this year.
What're the other comparable trades?
I think Jacobs is worth #20-#25 in normal circumstances; with his desire to leave, we could possibly get him a little cheaper.
Disagree with that rating?
You are desperate to pry him out, you have no AFL standard ruckmen.Again, assuming he wants to leave, then I'd think you'll get slightly under value, where as if he was ok there, but we were desperate to pry him out, we'd have to overpay.
In normal circumstances your pick 14 would be worth 22
They picked up a bunch of 17 year olds last year that would've been in the top bunch of players from this years draft.I understand that this is a compromised draft because of GC but where does the value of 22 from 14 come from?
They picked up a bunch of 17 year olds last year that would've been in the top bunch of players from this years draft.
And Jacobs has proven to be an AFL standard ruckman in how many career games?!You are desperate to pry him out, you have no AFL standard ruckmen.
