- Joined
- Sep 27, 2007
- Posts
- 5,580
- Reaction score
- 1,576
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
Players have to played for a team 10 years or a set amount of games for their team to qualify for the veterans list. So unless AFL has changed the veterans rule for Gold Cost and Greater Western Sydney it will be quite some time before they have players eligible for the veterans list.
The eligibility rule does change in 2012, dropping the 30yo age limit. There has never been a "set amount of games" eligibility criteria. Players will only have to have done 10 years service to qualify. It's the quid-pro-quo for the introduction of Free Agency. After 10 years the players become free agents, but the clubs can make them veterans and only have to include 50% of their salary under the cap - thereby allowing them to make better offers.
This rule change has been announced, but does not yet appear in the version of the AFL player rules (as of September 2010). The September 2010 version doesn't mention any exemptions for GC or GWS. I doubt that any of the players they stole from the legacy clubs will ever be eligible for veteran listing, as none of them will be around in 10 years time. That's definitely true for GC - if GWS are able to grab the likes of Scully & Palmer (as is the current speculation) then these kids may well achieve veteran status with GWS.
When Port came in, they had a concession which was that if a player was over 30 and had been with the club since inception then they would qualify for veterans listing. I assume that GC and GWS will get a similar concession.






