Sixpence
Brownlow Medallist
Long before the Hawks you say?you do realise the crows had the swooping crow logo from 1991-2009? long before the hawks "swooping" logo...
View attachment 2160136
From the 70s ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Long before the Hawks you say?you do realise the crows had the swooping crow logo from 1991-2009? long before the hawks "swooping" logo...
View attachment 2160136
I like the old logo, but the new one is good too. Subtle change in branding with 'Crows' dropped from the logo
That's not swooping, and the angle is different.
First thing I thought was that looks like a sharp edged version of the Hawks logo, those that think you must be legally blind to notice the similarities must be legally blind.Nothing? It's the exact same ****ing design. A bird swooping downward with talons out. Takes some mental gymnastics not to see that.
ouch that one almost sent me legally blindyou do realise the crows had the swooping crow logo from 1991-2009? long before the hawks "swooping" logo...
View attachment 2160136
Imagine getting this salty over a suggestion your new logo looks a lot like one of our old ones.Imagine trying to make the point about birds swooping as if it's unique to the hawk.
How many actions do you think birds have?
Its a side profile of the head, wings spread, a swooping action or a shit design. They are the three bird designs used across codes in the world.
Bring back bullying.
Imagine getting this salty over a suggestion your new logo looks a lot like one of our old ones.
It was a Crows fan that suggested they had a swooping logo first. They clearly didn't. Why is it so hard for you guys to accept that?
I also don't see Magpies, Eagles and Swans copying our designs.
The only thing that is embarrassing is your little tantrum. All I did was point out that the 2 logos look similar and you're losing your shit.Calling out stupidity isn't getting salty. Stop expecting the world to cater to people's right to have an opinion. You can have it, it doesn't mean you can't be ridiculed for it. Dont turn it around on the person who won't tolerate a fool.
Which post was it that suggested we came up with a swooping logo first in the world? I see one that states we had a swooping logo earlier than the one you tried to make a ridiculous point with. Can't see it mention we invented it.
Noone has copied your design. Its not your design. Hawthorn didn't invent the concept of a bird swooping. Would you like to go and claim Philadelphia Eagles of 1948 copied Hawthorns design of 1970s?
Embarrassing. Utterly Embarrassing.
The only thing that is embarrassing is your little tantrum. All I did was point out that the 2 logos look similar and you're losing your shit.
Get it together.
Marketing these days is mostly hot chicks with useless degrees who care more about their sneaker and baggy pants and tightness of their slicked back bun than actually, yknow, working.Bet some marketing w***er charged a fortune for that too
You're right. This was clearly the inspiration instead:You are really trying to play the 'youre upset' card? Desperate.
If you think those two logos look similar then you must have a wild time walking through the bush commenting on how similar one tree looks to the next.
It's a swooping bird. There ends the resemblance.
The same level of resemblance was held by Adelaide, Hawthorn and West Coast via them being side profile shots of bird heads.
Amazing stuff.
You're right.
Uncanny!
Marketing these days is mostly hot chicks with useless degrees who care more about their sneaker and baggy pants and tightness of their slicked back bun than actually, yknow, working.
Would've got her boyfriend to say a few names like Andrew Jarman and she's like, totally a girl boss so knows heaps of good terminology (that's not even a big word for Elisa) to totally explain its origins! yeaaasss
Eh? You realize I'm taking the piss out the design right? You're as slow as these crows folk.
Would have thought the Raygun post made it obvious, but it appears I need to explain it to you.