Crows @ the Brownlow

[tribey]

You accused people of bitching and being petty and tell them to get over it which is clearly having a go at them. That's quite clear, so to say people don't comprehend what you are saying is ridiculous.

People were bitching and being petty - as I have always maintained, it's a two-way street. And yes, there is distinct trouble with comprehension around here as you obviously took what I said as some sort of one-way slight on AFC fans, and others believed I was defending the actions of those who attended the function at PAFC while having a crack at espoir!

Bizarre.

Tredrea had no reason to refer to the Crows yet he chose to do so in the limited time available. It was a poor statement in the context of when it wa asked and worth commenting on. If you comment on someone being petty does that make you petty? Don't think so.

Commenting on the actual statement is fine. It's the predictable name-calling during and afterwards which made everything just as petty if not moreso than the overall behaviour exhibited on the night (gee, have I not already explained this? Comprehension indeed).

Goers comments were infalmatory and designed to taunt Crows supporters.

Of course they were, and if the shoe was on the other foot, I wouldn't have expected anything less from a die-hard Port-hating Crows man. Again, commenting on them is fine, but were the veiled inferences to pedophilia and his homosexuality needed? Mmmm. Designed to taunt indeed.

Do you agree with them? ( a question only - I know you didn't say you did before you accuse me of misunderstanding you).

I thought his comments and views regarding the AFC were over the top, but having said that, they are no different to the view of the AFC shared by the majority of PAFC fans.

 

[Fred Phillis]

Well, if that is the case then I stand corrected. Unbelieveable. Who is the journo btw and where was that reported?

wasn't reported, was contained in email from journo mate

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Your club has made it when you get other clubs supporters basing their usernames on your club.

Seems like you're a little obsessed there mate.

I am...I love you guys. By the way, aren't you on the wrong board mate. Not another quite day over PAFC way???

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

That's how.

Cliched maybe, but hypocritical, I don't think so..

 

[RooDog]

I am...I love you guys. By the way, aren't you on the wrong board mate. Not another quite day over PAFC way???

dude chill out and go and read what i wrote about tredreas comments on the previous page i think thats a fair point of view from a crows supporter

 

[sog35]

Yeah, I think a fair few are already in Melbourne.

And there's no such thing as the wrong board. I have a feeling you can contribute anywhere you like as long as you respect the opposition supporters. Now I don't think I've played the man yet.

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Of course I saw the article. Yes it was strong in its pro-PAFC and anti-AFC sentiment, but that's to be expected if the author thinks that way. I'm sure if you decided to write such an opinion piece you'd be absolutely glowing in your assessment of Port and their chances in the Grand Final?

As I said, it's a TWO WAY STREET. Get over it!

You're being ever so precious - and rather hypocritical. It's OK to bag/hate a football club/player as long as its not on TV? Give me a break.

Hypocritical, "people in glass houses..................".

 

[tribey]

Hypocritical, "people in glass houses..................".

Honest question, do you know the correct definition of the word?

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

dude chill out and go and read what i wrote about tredreas comments on the previous page i think thats a fair point of view from a crows supporter

mate I am chilling out...I can't see the harm in abit of gentle ribbing between rivals.....

 

[sog35]

mate I am chilling out...I can't see the harm in abit of gentle ribbing between rivals.....

Unless it is at a Brownlow medal count or in the media?

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Yeah, I think a fair few are already in Melbourne.

And there's no such thing as the wrong board. I have a feeling you can contribute anywhere you like as long as you respect the opposition supporters. Now I don't think I've played the man yet.

No that's fair enough. But i'm sure if I went onto the Port Board and displayed my biased comments ( which I couldn't help, as I am Crows biased and proud of it) I would get a few coments in return. I would be disappointed if i didn't.

Your biased, i'm biased, we are all biased...

 

[sog35]

I've come over here to display the Port point of view on the matter. I don't really see the need to get into name calling etc which I'm glad it hasn't turned into.

You could expect to get slagged back on the Port Board if you were talking crap but on the whole there's a pretty reasonable bunch over there.

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Honest question, do you know the correct definition of the word?

Example - The PAFC bagging the Crows in the media, me saying it's wrong and then going to the media myself and doing exactly the same thing. I would say though there is a difference between bagging in the media and bagging on the AFC board, abit less of an audience I would have thought?? I would also hazzard a guess that my profile would be abit less than the PAFC's.

I'll wait until the PAFC supporters leave the board and then you miraculously become a Crows supporter again before we continue this discussion.

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Unless it is at a Brownlow medal count or in the media?

You think what you like my friend. IMO it was yet another cheap shot from the PAFC...

 

[RooDog]

I've come over here to display the Port point of view on the matter. I don't really see the need to get into name calling etc which I'm glad it hasn't turned into.

You could expect to get slagged back on the Port Board if you were talking crap but on the whole there's a pretty reasonable bunch over there.

yeah we aint all that bad

but seriously its just because you were mature about it and didnt partake in any name calling or slagging yourself you just showed us a view from another perspective!!

 

[sog35]

You think what you like my friend. IMO it was yet another cheap shot from the PAFC...

You don't honestly think this is some sort of PAFC conspiracy surely?

 

[RooDog]

You don't honestly think this is some sort of PAFC conspiracy surely?

it wouldnt suprise if he did

the name is enough to show how he feels about them....

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

You don't honestly think this is some sort of PAFC conspiracy surely?

I don't it may well be................

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

You don't honestly think this is some sort of PAFC conspiracy surely?

Anyway, like i said earlier, good luck in the GF, let's hope it's a good game with Brisbane winning by a point...

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

it wouldnt suprise if he did

the name is enough to show how he feels about them....

Get your hand of it mate....I hope I haven't upset you with my aggressive behaviour towards our accross town rivals. I bet you sit at the footy and clap nervously so not to cause a scene or upset the opposition supporters.

 

[RooDog]

Get your hand of it mate....I hope I haven't upset you with my aggressive behaviour towards our accross town rivals. I bet you sit at the footy and clap nervously so not to cause a scene or upset the opposition supporters.

actually i sit in the members and yell and scream, i dont particulary like port too much and i boo them at the games but on here its a bit different mate thats all!!

 

[sog35]

Anyway, like i said earlier, good luck in the GF, let's hope it's a good game with Brisbane winning by a point...

Now that's something I'll definately have to agree to disagree with.

Hope your worst nightmare comes true

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

actually i sit in the members and yell and scream, i dont particulary like port too much and i boo them at the games but on here its a bit different mate thats all!!

Why should it be different???? I don't see the difference. Surely, we can take the P out of each other as long as it doesn't get personal or crude. I am amazed what certain members of the PAFC board ( not the guys we have been arguing with today ) get away with on this board. I would expect to be shot down in flames if I posted similar comments on the PAFC board.

 

[sog35]

Honestly it depends on the mod. We've had a fair bit of ******** come our way and that probably reduces our tolerance to level slightly below normal football supporters.

I haven't seen a whole lot of crap on this board from Port supporters though. Maybe I'm not looking hard enough?

 

[RooDog]

Why should it be different???? I don't see the difference. Surely, we can take the P out of each other as long as it doesn't get personal or crude. I am amazed what certain members of the PAFC board ( not the guys we have been arguing with today ) get away with on this board. I would expect to be shot down in flames if I posted similar comments on the PAFC board.

oh i will have a go at the guys that come on here and just bag us.. but blokes like sog i dont have a problem with because they come on here and make a fair and valid point! im with you on bagging that dude that all the port supporters think is Tredrea his a ********er and comes on here just to incite us, also though ive learnt if you pretend not to care they go away