I think you're making a connection between what the marketing and comms department put out on social media, that probably takes a small amount of player time/attention around footy related stuff, and what the players/staff are doing within the footy department regarding training, reviews, drafting, development, selection, on-field tactics etc. I just don't see evidence of this connection. Or that it's different for us versus other clubs which are more or less successful, or players of other clubs who probably post similar content (whether it's related to any social causes or just them having fun).I look at whats been put in front of me from the clubs social media, players social media and then look at performances the players are putting I can say the focus should be more football performance oriented.
Clearly I’m not saying this is the entire problem, I believe it’s a part of the problem of the final product we are putting out.
If you think it’s not then that’s ok we can disagree.
I think there can be an argument about us having lost the "Bloods culture" of accountability (on field, at selection and within coaching ranks) and ruthlessness (in terms of fitness, physicality) etc, but I just don't see evidence of this same connection that others do.
Now, I would like some more frank language from the club about performances, on and off field, less corporate speak when discussing this i.e. pointing out our "successes" last year, and less fluffy posts when it's tone deaf due to performance (I did make a joke a while back about changing my name to Seltzers86 when there was a post about some players Seltzer business, but I don't actually think that makes a difference to performance in a way that's different to other clubs/players).




