Blue Arrow
Club Legend
- Feb 22, 2019
- 1,415
- 1,474
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- The Renegades, Vics
I have zero knowledge about rugby but I suspect NZ would have most in a combined team too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Latham
Warner
Labuschagne
Williamson
Smith
Watling
Cummins
Jamieson
Hazlewood
Wagner
Lyon
Fitting 6 of the best fast bowlers in the world is a very hard task, Southee and Boult can take any of those guys place but Cummins
IMO Australia and NZ probably have 6 of the best 10 fast bowlers in the world in test cricket. Others being Rabada, Bumrah, Anderson, Broad
Well done to the Kiwi's on winning the inaugural WTC.
Which brings me what would be the best combined side at the moment ? Surely the Kiwi's would feature heavily.
Warner
Latham (NZ)
Williamson (NZ)
Smith
Taylor (NZ)
Labuschagne
Watling (NZ)
Cummins
Wagner (NZ)
Southee (NZ)/ Hazlewood
Boult (NZ)
Conway & Pucovski just not enough games at the top level to consider.
How could I NOT include Jamieson !!
No allround option in Green or DeGrandhomme
And no Lyon.
I'm going to throw my hat into the ring & suggest that out of the current crop Watling, Williamson, Taylor & Boult are all locks for NZ's ATG team.
Latham not too far away, but not sure if he dislodges former openers such as Sutcliffe & Turner.
Southee & Wagner (as well as Jamieson in a few years) are also knocking on the door, but can't see any reason to pick them ahead of Hadlee, Bond or even Jack Cowie just yet.
NZ ATG XI
Glenn Turner
Bert Sutcliffe
Kane Williamson*
Martin Crowe
Ross Taylor
John Reid
BJ Watling+
Daniel Vettori
Richard Hadlee
Trent Boult
Shane Bond
12th: Chris Cairns
good team. i'd probably have Hazelwood ahead of Boult and Conway ahead of Warner on current form. Sure his test career is just getting started, but he's scored a hell of lot of runs in International white ball cricket.I think Warner is such a great hand eye batsmen, but hes just not picking the ball up as quick as he's got older and he's struggled for a while now.
he was a great player dont get me wrong, but scores before and after that were few and far between.it was only 8 tests ago Warner made 335*
Broad took 69 wickets @ 20.08 during the WTC. Roach 39 @ 27.07. Broad was poor during India away but he didn't really bowl alot due to how spin friendly the conditions were. I'd still have him in front of Roach.This is very biased but I’d take broad or Wagner out and bring Roach in. Broad has had a better career than roach obviously but isn’t currently as good
Broad took 69 wickets @ 20.08 during the WTC. Roach 39 @ 27.07. Broad was poor during India away but he didn't really bowl alot due to how spin friendly the conditions were. I'd still have him in front of Roach.
Nor I. But who to pick tho in those conditions? HowStat will have the answer.If you were playing the game in NZ or England, I wouldn't pick him
Warner
Latham
Smith
Williamson (c)
Labuschagne
Taylor/Nicholls
Paine
Cummins
Hazelwood
Boult
Lyon.
Southee 12th.
I understand he's just retired, but BJ Watling is a lot better than Tim Paine. Think it's OK to include BJ in these hypothetical teams still. I'd have Blundell ahead of Paine, who is very average as both a keeper and batsman at international level.Warner
Latham
Smith
Williamson (c)
Labuschagne
Taylor/Nicholls
Paine
Cummins
Hazelwood
Boult
Lyon.
Southee 12th.
Reckon that side 'd give the Poms a nice little spanking both home and away.
I have 5 Black Caps.. so do you.sh*t... Ur a patriot
Better at what discipline.. batting.. well his records suggests that. You can knock his batting , captaincy, but sorry, Tim Paine is one of the best keepers of the modern era. I always want the best keeper in my team.but BJ Watling is a lot better than Tim Paine.
His batting record "suggests" he's better does it?Better at what discipline.. batting.. well his records suggests that. You can knock his batting , captaincy, but sorry, Tim Paine is one of the best keepers of the modern era. I always want the best keeper in my team.
My post said "record suggests he is a better batsman" than Paine. So no need to drag out their stats. Yes Paine did drop some sitters in the summer.. he is past his best. CA picked him in 2010 to debut as they considered him our best keeper. And he was. Was chosen to return as skipper in 2018 due to his people skills and his keeping skills.His batting record "suggests" he's better does it?
sorry BG but Watling is a very very good keeper. You just never notice him but not much gets past him.Better at what discipline.. batting.. well his records suggests that. You can knock his batting , captaincy, but sorry, Tim Paine is one of the best keepers of the modern era. I always want the best keeper in my team.
Probably. Not seen a lot of Watling. Want Paine behind the stumps to my predominately Aussie attack..sorry BG but Watling is a very very good keeper. You just never notice him but not much gets past him.
Fair enoughProbably. Not seen a lot of Watling. Want Paine behind the stumps to my predominately Aussie attack..
Paine's captaincy skills are debatable anyway. Personally I think he is another nail in the coffin of having a keeper as captain.sorry BG but Watling is a very very good keeper. You just never notice him but not much gets past him.
He'd get the nod for me ahead of Paine. I like Paine but his batting average, no of centuries etc dont do justice to the batting talent he has
Williamson would be Captain too, so don't need Paines captaincy skills either
None of this is a good argument for selecting Paine ahead of Watling in this hypothetical team.My post said "record suggests he is a better batsman" than Paine. So no need to drag out their stats. Yes Paine did drop some sitters in the summer.. he is past his best. CA picked him in 2010 to debut as they considered him our best keeper. And he was. Was chosen to return as skipper in 2018 due to his people skills and his keeping skills.
Fair enough
I'll stick with the guy who averages 5 runs more with the bat and keeps as well if not better
Plus nothing in your attack that makes keeping difficult with Starc out. Cummins and Hazelwood hardly bowl a bad ball and lately Lyon bowls too much at the stumps and doesn't have an arm ball let alone a Doosra, so only threatens one side of the bat
I have 5 Black Caps.. so do you.
Not only lately.. always. Lyon may have mounted a strong career but I wonder had CA had someone better at the time of his debut whether he'd have played even 38 matches.. as, imo, a better offie in Rowdy Mallet was given.Fair enough
I'll stick with the guy who averages 5 runs more with the bat and keeps as well if not better
Plus nothing in your attack that makes keeping difficult with Starc out. Cummins and Hazelwood hardly bowl a bad ball and lately Lyon bowls too much at the stumps and doesn't have an arm ball let alone a Doosra, so only threatens one side of the bat
Then we're gonna have to agree to disagree.None of this is a good argument for selecting Paine ahead of Watling in this hypothetical team.
I'm not arguing any of your other selections.